I believe a /snap/snapd directory should exist on a typical Ubuntu
installation - in other words, snapd itself would typically be installed
as a snap.
Can you please provide the output of running 'snap list' in a terminal?
Also have you tried installing the snapd snap and seeing if that helps?
--
I see. You will most likely want to have the 'snapd' snap package installed, so
that you would receive the latest updates to snapd (I'm not aware of the exact
policies, but the snapd deb might lag behind the snap).
Also snapd-desktop-integration is a separate package than snapd, and you will
cer
Hello,
Looking at DpkgTerminalLog.txt, I believe the failure here was when the
firefox deb helper tried to install the firefox snap, and failed when
trying to connect to the snap store. Unfortunately there may not be much
we can do here except suggest trying with a different network
connectivity s
According to seb128, upstream was working on a solution to this via
portals a while back[1], but I don't know about its current status; so
I'll try following up with them to see if they may have any updates
about it.
[1] https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/making-it-easier-to-migrate-data-from-
other-bro
Per checking with mconley from upstream, the aforementioned
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/1818237 was for addressing the use-case of
allowing a Firefox snap installation to import bookmarks from a Chromium
snap installation, and that work indeed landed in Firefox 120.
They've now opened a new bug h
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1903343
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1903343
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1903343
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1902216
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065382
Title:
Screen
There are build breakages on the ARM architectures especially on older
releases where we don't recent build toolchains. Currently builds on
older series are blocked by missing rustc 1.76 (being worked on).
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug n
Hello,
Looking at DpkgTerminalLog.txt, I believe the failure here was when the
firefox deb helper tried to install the firefox snap, and failed when
trying to connect to the snap store. Unfortunately there may not be much
we can do here except suggest trying with a different network
connectivity s
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048792
Title:
Firefox utilizing 100% of station CPU
To manage notifications about thi
Hello,
Has the problem occurred since you initially reported this a few months
ago? Especially if so, would you please consider reporting the bug on
upstream's tracker at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org as well? Thanks.
Edit: Also it'd be great if you could add the version of the Firefox
this occurr
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1878870
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878870
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878870
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hello,
Unfortunately I don't have any ideas as to why this may have happened.
Is there perhaps anything unusual about your system setup, for example
home directories in a different location than /home/youruser ? Or
perhaps unusual networking setup, like lacking IPv4 connectivity?
Also, are you a
Hello,
The terminal logs suggest that the failure was due to not being able to
install the 'firefox' and 'gnome-42-2204' snaps, but unfortunately I
don't have any ideas as to why this may have happened.
Is there perhaps anything unusual about your system setup, for example
home an unusual network
With Firefox 125 having been released already, are folks able to confirm
that it has indeed fixed this issue?
** Also affects: firefox via
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882449
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed
Hello,
Are you still able to reproduce this with latest version of Firefox? If
so, would you please open a bug report for this upstream on Mozilla's
tracker at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org ? Thanks.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notif
Hello,
Are you able to reproduce this on Ubuntu Noble (24.04), and with the
latest version of Firefox? If so, would you please also open a bug
report upstream on Mozilla's tracker at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org ?
Also, would you please double-check the system logs and also dmesg for
any potenti
Hello,
Are you still able to reproduce this in latest versions of Firefox and
Ubuntu?
Also, can you please check if you might have 'letterboxing' enabled by
any chance? This might be a side-effect of enabled letterboxing. To
check that, open 'about:config' and see if you have a
'privacy.resistFin
Hmm I see, thanks for the info, and for pointing out those upstream
bugs. I'll mark this bug as confirmed then.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Since I can't reproduce this and per jdb this has already been fixed,
I've updated the bug status accordingly. Thanks!
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello,
Is there perhaps anything unusual about your system setup, for example
home directories being located at a different/unusual location?
Would you be able to try restarting the following snapd services, in
case it may help?
sudo systemctl restart snapd.seeded.service
sudo systemctl restart
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045980
Title:
AppArmor config denies 'k' access to suggest.sq
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Rico Tzschichholz (ricotz)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044157
Title:
Firefox 120.0+build2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1~mt1 - Uni
Hello,
Would you be able to check if the issue still remains on Ubuntu 24.04,
and also with latest versions of Firefox?
Also, given that the issue affects not only firefox but seemingly other
gtk-based applications too, I think I'll mark the bug as affecting
gtk+3.0.
** Also affects: gtk+3.0 (Ub
Hello,
Are you still able to reproduce this crash with latest Firefox trunk?
FYI the packages from mozillateam PPAs are generally not officially
supported, and especially Firefox trunk/nightly issues are best reported
directly to upstream on their https://bugzilla.mozilla.org tracker.
Thanks.
--
Hello,
I realize it's pretty late now (apologies for that) but do you happen to
have the systemd journal logs from the time of this failure? Or reasons
as to why pulseaudio didn't seem to be running normally? Or steps for
reproducing this issue today with a system with up-to-date packages,
includi
Hmm, this is strange because the output suggests the firefox package was
not installed ?
At any rate, if by any chance you still have access to the system in
that state, perhaps trying restarting the following snapd services may
help:
sudo systemctl restart snapd.seeded.service
sudo systemctl res
Great, thanks for confirming! I'll close this as fixed then.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Hello,
The Firefox snap should have read access to the files in
~/.local/share/fonts that are owned by the current user, via the
'desktop' interface.
Are you still able to reproduce this issue? If so, can you ensure that
the 'snapd' snap is installed (by running 'snap list' and see it listed
ther
Successfully tested xdg-desktop-portal 1.18.4-1ubuntu2.24.04.1 from
noble-proposed using the test plan in the bug description, in a clean
and up-to-date noble amd64 VM.
Following the test plan, I first tested that the native messaging portal
works as expected before upgrading xdg-desktop-portal by
Successfully tested xdg-desktop-portal 1.14.4-1ubuntu2~22.04.2 from
jammy-proposed using the test plan in the bug description, in a clean
and up-to-date jammy amd64 VM.
Following the test plan, I first tested that the native messaging portal
works as expected before upgrading xdg-desktop-portal by
Public bug reported:
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
This was caused by:
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
This is most likely a transient problem,
please try again later.
If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command
'ubu
Public bug reported:
An unresolvable problem occurred while calculating the upgrade.
This was caused by:
* Upgrading to a pre-release version of Ubuntu
This is most likely a transient problem,
please try again later.
If none of this applies, then please report this bug using the command
'ubu
Public bug reported:
yes
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libpq-dev 9.5.19-0ubuntu0.16.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-52.56~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-52-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.19
AptOrdering:
libpq5: Install
libpq5: Con
can't even install Ubuntu 19.04 on Asus vivobook s15 s530uf. Black
screen, even the installer USB stops blinking. But I can install it
using the `safe graphics` option. But when I reboot it gets stuck at the
black screen. Frustrated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
ng my hard drive space (20+ GB) and "/boot" folder
space (only 49 MB!), but this message screen allows only one screenshot.
Thank you,
~Kam (Kamlesh B. Amin)
408.622.1935 (M)
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.220.9
ProcVersionSignature
This is 2nd of the two screenshots that I could not provide originally
with my bug report. Just in case if it helps developer to troubleshoot.
Thank you.
** Attachment added: "Total Hard disc space available"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1674346/+attac
** Attachment added: "Only few MB recognized by system for boot folder"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1674346/+attachment/4840967/+files/boot%20folder%20space%20mystery.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Hi Brian,
The command you gave me increased /boot size to few MB (90.5 to be exact).
But the upgrade got stuck again with similar error of higher MB#!
Please refer to attached image.
Would I be better off reformatting my C:\ drive and install new Ubuntu
from USB? My laptop is fairly old with a 40
Public bug reported:
```bash lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS
Release:16.04
```
```bash apt-cache policy steam
steam:
Installé : (aucun)
Candidat : 1:1.0.0.48-1ubuntu3
Table de version :
1:1.0.0.48-1ubuntu3 500
500 http://tn.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu x
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
i unable to install ubuntu 10.10 in my acer netbook.
** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
Public bug reported:
auditd seems to ignore rules on /proc set in /etc/audit/rules.d/
cat /etc/audit/rules.d/10-test.rules
-w /proc -p wa -k test_proc
auditctl -l
No rules
distro = jammy
auditd version = 1:3.0.7-1build1
Workarounds:
1- use auditctl to either define audit rules or read the r
Public bug reported:
auditd seems to ignore rules on /proc set in /etc/audit/rules.d/
cat /etc/audit/rules.d/10-test.rules
-w /proc -p wa -k test_proc
auditctl -l
No rules
distro = jammy
auditd version = 1:3.0.7-1build1
Workarounds:
1- use auditctl to either define audit rules or read the r
Public bug reported:
auditd seems to ignore rules on /proc set in /etc/audit/rules.d/
cat /etc/audit/rules.d/10-test.rules
-w /proc -p wa -k test_proc
auditctl -l
No rules
distro = jammy
auditd version = 1:3.0.7-1build1
Workarounds:
1- use auditctl to either define audit rules or read the r
Public bug reported:
auditd seems to ignore rules on /proc set in /etc/audit/rules.d/
cat /etc/audit/rules.d/10-test.rules
-w /proc -p wa -k test_proc
auditctl -l
No rules
distro = jammy
auditd version = 1:3.0.7-1build1
Workarounds:
1- use auditctl to either define audit rules or read the r
Public bug reported:
auditd seems to ignore rules on /proc set in /etc/audit/rules.d/
cat /etc/audit/rules.d/10-test.rules
-w /proc -p wa -k test_proc
auditctl -l
No rules
distro = jammy
auditd version = 1:3.0.7-1build1
Workarounds:
1- use auditctl to either define audit rules or read the r
TIME_DIR=
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: grub-installer
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Al-Amin Islam Hridoy (hridoybuzz)
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug
201 - 247 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
