oneiric has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the oneiric task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
natty has seen the end of its life and is no longer receiving any
updates. Marking the natty task for this ticket as "Won't Fix".
** Changed in: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Migrated to bugzilla: https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569
** Bug watch added: Linaro Bug Tracking System #569
https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=569
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.38-10.46
---
linux (2.6.38-10.46) natty-proposed; urgency=low
[ Steve Conklin ]
* Release Tracking Bug
- LP: #802464
[ Upstream Kernel Changes ]
* Revert "put stricter guards on queue dead checks"
* Revert "fix oops in scs
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/lucid-proposed/linux-lts-backport-natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679
Title:
Missing proper support for Beagle XM rev B and C
To manage notificati
>From Matt's log:
[0.00] Linux version 2.6.38-10-omap (buildd@crabapple) (gcc version
4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) ) #44-Ubuntu Fri Jun 3 06:51:06 UTC 2011
(Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-omap 2.6.38.7)
...
[0.150482] OMAP3 Beagle Rev: xM C
So it's working fine on a Rev C.
Thanks for h
I just tested the kernel and it seems to be working fine for me.
Here is my dmesg dump: http://paste.ubuntu.com/621469/
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:46 PM, Matt Ownby wrote:
> I have a rev C board and am willing to test it if someone can walk me
> through it and help me recover if it goes badly :)
>
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided => Low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
I have a rev C board and am willing to test it if someone can walk me
through it and help me recover if it goes badly :)
I hang out in the #ubuntu-arm IRC channel ( Matt_O )
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Tobin Davis
<770...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote:
> Normally, as the QA guy, I would test this
Normally, as the QA guy, I would test this and report back asap.
Unfortunately, I cannot test this properly as I do not have one of the
affected boards. I will reach out to the community on IRC and see if I
can drum up volunteers.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Guys,
I won't be able to verify this in time, as another developer has the "C"
board at another location.. By now, more users on irc should have the
"C" board..
Regards,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.l
This bug is awaiting verification that the kernel in -proposed solves
the problem. Please test the kernel and update this bug with the
results. If the problem is solved, change the tag
'verification-needed-natty' to 'verification-done-natty'.
If verification is not done by one week from today, th
This bug was fixed in the package linux - 2.6.39-3.10
---
linux (2.6.39-3.10) oneiric; urgency=low
[ Colin Ian King ]
* SAUCE: S3 early resume debug via keyboard LEDs
[ Ingo Molnar ]
* ubuntu: nx-emu - i386: NX emulation
* ubuntu: nx-emu - i386: mmap randomization for exe
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679
Ti
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux-linaro-omap (Ubuntu Natty)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: u-boot-linaro (Ubuntu Natty)
Impor
Matt,
Your ID of (011) doesn't make a lot of sense, since that would be the
next logical "xM C++" aka "xM D" revision would be.. ;)
Maybe Koen knows something we don't, when he implemented the "omap3:
beagle: if rev unknown, assume xM revision C" part of the xM C
changeset...
Regards,
--
You r
Pull request: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-
team/2011-May/015591.html
SRU Justification:
Impact: Owners of Beagle xM rev C (newer ones) can't boot with current
Natty's kernel.
Fix: Detect the rev C revision and proper initialize it (like older xM).
Testcase: Boot the kernel with a B
I also noticed that mine was unidentified. When I say I have a rev C, I am
going off what the box says that my beagleboard came in. I know of no other
way to ID it.
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Ricardo Salveti
wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Robert Nelson
> wrote:
> > Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Robert Nelson wrote:
> Hi Ricardo,
>
> The kernel looks good on the "xM C"..
>
> ubuntu@omap:~$ lsusb
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0424:ec00 Standard Microsystems Corp.
> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0424:9514 Standard Microsystems Corp.
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Li
u-boot notes: (with natty headless image):
Texas Instruments X-Loader 1.5.0 (Apr 11 2011 - 09:47:05)
Beagle xM
Reading boot sector
Loading u-boot.bin from mmc
U-Boot 2011.03 (Apr 20 2011 - 07:19:53)
OMAP3630/3730-GP ES2.1, CPU-OPP2, L3-165MHz, Max CPU Clock 1 Ghz
OMAP3 Beagle board + LPDDR/NAND
Hi Ricardo,
The kernel looks good on the "xM C"..
ubuntu@omap:~$ lsusb
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 0424:ec00 Standard Microsystems Corp.
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0424:9514 Standard Microsystems Corp.
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
ubuntu@omap:~$ dmesg | grep Beagle
[
@Matt: interested that you said you had a rev C but the GPIO reported something
else, as you can see from the logs:
[0.143920] OMAP3 Beagle Rev: unknown 3, assuming xM C or newer
So it could be the case that the GPIO is not set as 010 for xM C. As I
can't find the proper hardware manuals now
I tested the patched kernel with my xM rev C and it works. Also GLES2
works too (which was previously broken for me).
My dmesg output is at:
http://paste.ubuntu.com/604270/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:33 PM, John Rigby <770...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> I have added the three kernel patches to the packaged kernel. What
> about the u-boot patches? Do we need them?
It seems that the only important part of the u-boot patches is where
it sets the default case to behave
I have added the three kernel patches to the packaged kernel. What
about the u-boot patches? Do we need them?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770679
Title:
Missing proper support for
Hi Ricardo,
Sure i'll give it a test. I have an xM B at my desk now (it actually
comes up as xM A, last i talked to Gerald, none of the xM B's are
actually "xM B's" as far as the gpio identification..) But the xM C
left yesterday with another developer, should have it back tomorrow..
Regards,
The kernel packages can be located at
http://people.canonical.com/~rsalveti/770679/
Robert, can you help testing this package for us? I believe you're one
of the few who have a Beagle xM C (and probably also B).
Tested with my xM A and worked as expected:
ubuntu@ubuntu:~$ dmesg | grep xM
[0.
For u-boot it seems we need 2 patches:
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/85303/
* http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/92334/
They were sent upstream, but not yet applied.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Robert is working to include the proper support at the kernel with
upstream, and he'll probably forward the first 5 patches at
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~beagleboard-
kernel/+junk/2.6-stable/files/head:/patches/wip_to_be_pushed/
I removed the cosmetic changes and applied just what's need to have
30 matches
Mail list logo
