You might want to try to install the more recent Debian revision 1.5.1-5 from
here:
http://packages.debian.org/sid/bibus
There is a link to the .deb package at the bottom of the page.
Hope, this helps...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
obody cared to get it
into Ubuntu. If you like, you can give it a try. For your convenience,
I attached the relevant diffs between bibus 1.4.3.2-3 and 1.4.3.2-5.
Unfortunately, I cannot assist you in this, as I am not familiar with
the Ubuntu procedures.
Good luck
Sorry for the delay, but now finally a new Debian version of bibus was
uploaded to Debian unstable some hours ago. I created a sync-request bug
here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384345.
Thanks for reporting this bug!
Best Regards,
Jan
--
Recommend only writer instead of all of openoffice
ht
; urgency=low
[ Jan Beyer ]
* debian/control:
- bibus recommends no longer openoffice.org, but only openoffice.org-writer
(LP: #382448).
- bibus-doc-en now depends on w3m instead of lynx, which has a lower
priority.
[ Charles Plessy ]
* debian/control:
- Allow Jan to
Fix commited to Debian Science SVN, where the Debian packaging is done.
** Changed in: bibus (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Recommend only writer instead of all of openoffice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382448
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
** Changed in: bibus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: bibus (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jan Beyer (beathovn)
--
Recommend only writer instead of all of openoffice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382448
You received this bug notification because you
schrieb feranick am 29.03.2009 10:27 Uhr:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: gwyddion
>
> A new upstream release of Gwyddion is available (v. 2.14).
Debian packaging work is finished in SVN repository since some time and
waiting for upload to Debian unstable (will happen, as soon as s
On 02/10/2009 10:21 AM, feranick wrote :
> Thanks for your effort Jan. Please notify here with a note when 2.13 is
> available on Debian sid in a final form, so that it can be sync.
This night gwyddion 2.13-1 got uploaded to Debian unstable.
Best Regards,
Jan
--
New upstream release available: G
Hi Joseph,
I'm the guy who takes care of gwyddion in Debian. I finished packaging
2.13-1 yesterday evening, it's sitting in Debian-Med's SVN and waiting for a
sponsor. This version is going to feature gwyddion's Python scripting
interface pygwy, finally.
On 02/10/2009 02:53 AM, Joseph Smidt wrote
[I hope, cross-posting to several bug reports is not considered terribly bad
in this case...]
Gwyddion 2.12 was uploaded to Debian unstable a moment ago. You might want
to sync again. ;-)
Please note, that this version includes a fixed
gwyddion-thumbnailer.schemas-file in contrast to upstreams's
On 01/04/2009 10:32 PM, feranick wrote :
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: gwyddion
>
> A new upstream release of Gwyddion is available (v. 2.12).
... and going to get packaged soon, I hope... ;-)
But there have been rather big changes (thumbnailer-addition...), so it
might take som
Und es begab sich am 23.12.2008 21:58, dass Jan Beyer schrieb:
> I'm working on a Debian package of 2.11. If there are no big problems
> popping up, it should get uploaded to Debian unstable soon. You can
> watch http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gwyddion.html for news.
This morning
I'm working on a Debian package of 2.11. If there are no big problems
popping up, it should get uploaded to Debian unstable soon. You can
watch http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gwyddion.html for news.
Best Regards,
Jan
--
Update Gwyddion to version 2.11
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/310922
You
feranick wrote, On 19.07.2008 06:22:
> Any chance to backport it to Hardy? GIven the LTS nature of Hardy,
> people will stick with it for a while, so an updated version would
> definitively help.
Could somebody on an Ubuntu machine please try to do a backport?
Or request one? It should work without
On 07/16/2008 10:48 AM, feranick wrote :
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/Ubuntu-universe-sponsors
>
hm, I think, I was more looking for this one:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gwyddion/+bug/246823/+addsubscriber
--
New upstream release of gwyddion (2.10) available
https:/
On 07/16/2008 10:10 AM, Sarah Hobbs wrote :
> synced, thanks.
Great!
Many thanks, Sarah!
>
> (please subscribe ubuntu-universe-sponsors in future)
Good to know! I'll have a look how to do this.
Thanks again!
Jan
--
New upstream release of gwyddion (2.10) available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
On 07/16/2008 09:27 AM, Connor Imes wrote :
> I believe package updates are still available to be put in Intrepid, but
> it's not for us to do. A Repository Contributor or MOTU will have to
> perform the sync.
Can one ping one these persons somehow?
--
New upstream release of gwyddion (2.10) ava
On 07/16/2008 08:41 AM, feranick wrote :
> Jan,
>
> First of all, thanks for you work on packaging Gwyddion for Debian. I
You are welcome!
> don't think it should be you doing the actual sync. When Gwyddion was
> first released in Ubuntu Hardy, Ubuntu maintainer for the package did
> the actual s
On 07/15/2008 11:47 PM, Connor Imes wrote :
> Confirmed, thank you. Please sync version 2.10-1 from Debian unstable.
>
> ** Changed in: gwyddion (Ubuntu)
>Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
>Status: New => Confirmed
>
Is this something I can do? How?
Sorry - I have no idea, how such
Debian unstable packages of gwyddion 2.10 are now available.
Best Regards,
Jan
--
New upstream release of gwyddion (2.10) available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246823
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
20 matches
Mail list logo
