Removing block-proposed-noble as update-manager and apt are both ready
to release now, having just verified update-manager/oracular.
** Tags removed: block-proposed-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in
dly
Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
Fix Committed
Bug description:
As reported on bug 2111790 gpgv-from-sq was pulled in.
Julian said to cerate a new bug for this aspect [1].
This here is that bug.
Original behavior
```
$ sudo apt upgrade
The following packages were automatica
As reported on bug 2111790 gpgv-from-sq was pulled in.
Julian said to cerate a new bug for this aspect [1].
This here is that bug.
Original behavior
```
$ sudo apt upgrade
The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer
required:
gpgv-from-sq gpgv-
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Questing)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Public bug reported:
[Impact]
The solver evaluation revealed cases where installing new packages
inadvertently removed manually installed packages from the system such as
ubuntu-minimal.
For users on the default solver, this causes two issues:
1. If the default solver fails to find a solution,
** Package changed: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109495
Title:
unattended-upgrades can (and regularly does) pau
The API now exists
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672
Title:
phased updates API and cli
I think we're making some progress on identifying issues similar to
that, it turns out that the transaction handling is somewhat broken: If
an `apt update` is cancelled, a partial transaction is committed, as we
have no way to identify if a transaction is complete or not.
The confusing issue here
** Package changed: coreutils (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to coreutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110555
Title:
Daiy questing quokka hangs with cp command
Status
** Changed in: rust-coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2110537
Title:
tzdata fails to install when using rust-c
With the change we have come up with, instead of calculating which
updates are ignored phased updates, we instead consider any update as an
ignored phased update that has the phased update field set and could not
be upgraded by apt.
This is a change in behavior in that:
1) If an upgrade is say 90
This is funky. We may need to do some interactive debugging
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2109758
Title:
software updater says there are more updates b
I first upgraded apt, libapt-pkg6.0t64 to 2.8.3.
Validation for RSA1024 remaining weak:
root@noble:~# gpg --quick-gen-key j...@debian.org rsa1024
gpg: directory '/root/.gnupg' created
gpg: keybox '/root/.gnupg/pubring.kbx' created
We need to generate a lot of random bytes. It is a good idea to
As discussed before and documented in the bug description, we are
ignoring this for verification purposes, and setting this to done. The
bug will be reopened once the update has been released to be fixed
properly in a future upload.
** Tags removed: block-proposed block-proposed-noble verification
The autopkgtests for apt/noble have passed; per the documented test plan
> To validate the APT change on noble, we must rely on the test suite as
we won't have a noble->oracular upgrade bug causing it, most likely.
I am hence setting this to verification-done-noble.
** Tags removed: verification
The autopkgtests for APT have passed on all releases, so marking the bug
as verified per the test plan (as the test suite includes the tests for
this bug).
All regressions except for update-manager/noble have been resolved by
retries. The update-manager regressions in noble are caused by the
chang
FIPS is handled by the security certification team and a separate repo,
so assigning it to them for lack of better workflow.
** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Security Certification
(canonical-security-certification)
--
You received this bug notification
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: curl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ravi Kant Sharma (ravi-sharma)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to curl in Ubuntu.
https
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2107223
Title:
mirror sync in progr
The update inadvertently disabled DSA signatures. We believed DSA
signatures (1) could not use SHA2 hashes and (2) were not trusted
anyway, but it seems that xenial, which is dual-signed with a DSA1024
bit key has a SHA512 DSA1024 signature and that is still considered
trusted.
This is causing the
This issue only occurs in a highly unusual system configuration where
1. /tmp is a separate mount point from / (before oracular, it usually is a
directory in /)
2. Said mountpoint is mounted noexec (even the tmpfs in oracular is not mounted
noexec)
Given that there is an easy workaround to set
Marking as fix released accordingly.
** Changed in: debconf (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Also affects: debconf (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: debconf (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: debcon
Doesn't seem a priority to fix, just technical debt cleanup
** Changed in: libu2f-host (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: rls-pp-wontfix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
The signed-by field in sources.list files is not (and never has been)
supported by python-apt and hence software-properties, hence I believe
it's not shown, as --list likely only shows valid sources.
Rest assured that valid sources are being shown,, for example on my
system I see:
deb [arch=am
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse resu
# Problem statement
The problem here is that
* Installed gnome-settings-daemon Depends: libcannbera-gtk3-0
* Installed libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (= 0.30-10ubuntu10) Provides:
libcanberra-gtk3-0
* Upgrade libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (= 0.30-17ubuntu2) Depends:
libcanberra-gtk3-0
i.e. we renamed libc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2105395 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395
Same issue as 2105395
--- tmp/AptSolverDump-2106340.system.txt2025-04-07 09:00:54.944631938
+0200
+++ tmp/AptSolverDump-2106340.git.txt 2025-04-07 09:00:56.858634719 +0200
@@ -1,10 +1,6 @@
Upgra
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
Actually it wasn't, this dump simply is too old and affected by other
bugs in the dumper. It seems this was the result of an `apt upgrade` but
the old version did not differentiate and rendr it the same as an `apt-
get upgrade`, in turn forbidding packages from being installed.
In any case I can
This has been fixed already over the last month.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099966
Title:
** Summary changed:
- Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
+ Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 fails
to upgrade
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
h
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2105395 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395
Evaluation shows this is the same issue as 2105395, notably, we
install fewer upgrades and it is counted as a worse result
--- tmp/AptSolverDump-2105708.system.txt2025-04-07 08:59:01.606467236
** Summary changed:
- Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
+ Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: fewer upgrades counted as
worse
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://
** Summary changed:
- Probably problem with GNOME
+ Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099966
Title:
Failure: The
You received an error report as part of running apt, which is running a
solver evaluation program right now that creates error reports if the
next solver is worse than the classic one.
** Summary changed:
- crash occurred during file transfer from back up hdd
+ Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102236
Title:
plucky/s390x does not come up after kernel update + reboot, due to
I am going to mark the tasks as won't fix as this is listed in the
release notes
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: coreutils (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Triaged
**
The level has changed:
Algorithms missing in "APT::Key::Assert-Pubkey-Algo" cause errors now,
whereas algorithms in "APT::Key::Assert-Pubkey-Algo::Next" cause
warnings.
Accordingly, the values were moved around such that
"APT::Key::Assert-Pubkey-Algo::Next" matches the old
APT::Key::Assert-Pubke
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103839
Title:
timedatectl set-timezone does not update /et
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2105395
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
It seems you accidentally typed a command into the file rather than the
shell some time ago, I suggest fixing it
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subs
For an apt task we're going to need a solver dump generated with
-o Dir::Log::Solver=/path/to/a/file.edsp
as this is not reproducible at all for me.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python-apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
The deb contains a 3.5GB file. The python-apt code reads the file into
memory into a C++ array and then creates a PyBytes object from it,
copying the data, causing 7GB of memory usage.
** Changed in: python-apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because
Setting a size limit works around this, because the go() method calls
the callback with None when the object does not fit into memory (and no
specific member was requested in the go call).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is sub
** Also affects: unattended-upgrades (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1076097
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades i
Thanks for confirming, but also I want to note that it seems you have a
misconfigured system because you should not be pulling stuff from
proposed by default. In any case the bug will close once the package
migrated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch s
Put the security levels (noble release vs unapproved vs oracular) into a
table in
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rIREl1ebAoJXyqjig5MlV1-Jae9EREcApuVMlKT1whQ/edit?tab=t.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ap
The error messages are generated by apt; and the apt includes the
process holding the lock if available since 1.9.2.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/468
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21039
Public bug reported:
APT in plucky uses a pager, so far we pass LESS=FRX, but this is not
very intuitive, so I'd like to pass SMK as well:
* S disables the bell
* M changes the prompt from ":" to "lines 1-2"
* K makes the pager exit on ctrl+c which makes it more discoverable how to exit
These fl
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/470
** Description changed:
APT in plucky uses a pager, so far we pass LESS=FRX, but this is not
very intuitive, so I'd like to pass SMK as well:
* S disables the bell
* M changes the prompt from ":" to "lines 1-2"
* K makes the
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/469
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You rece
/x8BvcpBiCJ6GQgTLuiI+J0ncMKfC1S7doeAVUh939WobcDgkUls/jK0TKa134rCyGjpNOYsC
GSBgIilX7aq01KDBBt4oi0w/kOeAdjvtU00ZcYgeC9YnotIGdPFvjaQgavB2Wua6CVRn3tvF4chh
4AEIgvUOTAY=
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2103556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103556
Oh nevermind, I was testing the wrong version of apt. This is fixed in
2.9.34, it is a duplicate of bug 2103556
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2103556
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a w
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2103556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103556
Oh shoot Andreas, I am strangely enough unable to reproduce this. If you
still experience it (you were running a dist-upgrade when it triggered
that solver regression report), can you run dist-upgrade with -
Xavier please file a separate bug, this one is solved. There can be
loads of different underlying conditions that can cause the evaluation
to fail with a worse result. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
The runtime tree structure/contents mapping is fed from a cache db which
just essentially maps package,type pairs to some data (e.g. (package,
contents ) maps to the list of files) or the packages directly. At
runtime we read the file list from each file and build the reverse map
file->packages.
T
Sorry, yes, I remember. I was using putenv() rather than setenv() for
memory safety reasons, pointless ones, and that overrides values
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags
Public bug reported:
Testing
ProblemType: AptSolver
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04
Package: apt 2.9.33+0~202503141434~ubuntu25.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.14.0-11.11-generic 6.14.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 6.14.0-11-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.32.0-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResu
An even stronger fix is included with
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/2103556
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in U
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103556
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/467
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/21035
This was just testing uploading with zstd-compressed, base64-encoded
solver dumps (which are needed to fit into errors.ubuntu.com database)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, wh
Actually tagging the coreutils one as triaged as it should refer you to
logind or support reading from there
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1080330
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080330
** Also affects: coreutils (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101101
Title:
[p-m] FTBFS in the proposed pocket
Status in bash package in Ubuntu:
Triaged
Fix in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/466
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102720
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
Thanks, this is very useful. Now that you likely did upgrade dhcpcd-base
you should not get further reports of this, but this is very useful for
me to figure that out.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse r
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102
Maybe I should print some message in apt when I generate a report for
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/evaluating-the-new-apt-solver-
in-25-04/55618
But in released versions apport doesn't prompt for bug reports but you get the
whoopsie error reports, so not sure.
--
You received this bug notif
Sorry, reading a third time, the `apt update` also succeeds entirely and
does not report any connection issue. All sources are reported as up-to-
date and correct.
The timeout message is not from APT but some post-update hook.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Alright I made a silly mistake when I patched the "don't detect manually
installed package as obsolete"; the calls were interleaved. So we see
the "libdpkg-perl Suggests bzr" *before* we see "brz" as installed and
set the flag in the solver state. Turns out I gotta loop twice; who
knew?
** Changed
Ah I think you have a hold (or pin) on brz; and the new solver now
considers "brz" as obsolete because the candidate version is not
installable anymore, and then tries to prefer to satisfiy
libdpkg-perl Suggests bzr
by installing bzr (it does not want to end up with Suggests getting
broken by upg
This was fixed in apparmor; so not fixing it in os-prober
** Changed in: os-prober (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in U
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101800
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse
/Recommends confusion
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Fix still in progress, turns out the fix I had queued actually breaks
something else (autoremove in 3.1 solver level), but perhaps 3.1
autoremove is actually broken anyway since nothing tests it :D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whi
Fix in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/459
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
APT 2.9.32 released with the fix. Frankly I think that's the only
difference vs 2.9.31ubuntu3, and turned out trivial.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100247
Tit
FInal piece in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/458/
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
It's not possible for os-prober to reliably unmount it's filesystem
mounts sadly, so hence the mount namespaces are necessary. Mounting file
systems in the global mount namespace can easily make random things try
to read them.
But also os-prober should probably use more namespaces. The grub file
s
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2088268
Title:
systemd /tmp cleaning removes files that
Should we ship the apparmor profiles in os-prober or do you want to
stash them into the big apparmor profiles package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099811
Removing the incoming tag as this is archive admin work
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libselinux in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099944
Title:
Depwait on libse
I think you can pass -o Debug::RunScripts=1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100714
Title:
apt cannot update from security repo
Status in apt package in Ubuntu
It *sounds* like your dbus is timing out, and you have packagekit
installed and it fails in
Running external script: '/usr/bin/test -e /usr/share/dbus-1/system-
services/org.freedesktop.PackageKit.service && /usr/bin/test -S
/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket && /usr/bin/gdbus call --system --dest
or
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100
** Summary changed:
- Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
+ Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: obsolete
postgresql-client-16 replaced by postgresql-client
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
I have forwarded this as a question with the IS team who operate the
servers. I'm closing the bug in apt, as server bugs are not bugs in apt.
I assume this has been resolved shortly after you reported it, as I did
not see it.
The redirect in curl seems correct, you requested /ubuntu and were
redir
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2096979 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096979
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2096979
wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk
Encryption setup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Action items:
(1) Fix the EDSP protocol handler to not consider a non-downloadable
version as downloadable. Funny trickery.
(2) I see postgresql-client-16 is manually installed.
The answer here seems to be that when we go look at dependencies to
process:
postgresql-client as postgresql-clien
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100247
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
Status
Suffice it to say, what happens on the real system is that it sees that
you have
postgresql-client-16
installed.
As that package is no longer available in the repository, it demotes it
in priority and when it sees a dependency on postgresql-client, installs
the metapackage. In this case, it seem
Do I understand this correctly? You were running a bare `apt dist-
upgrade`. It produced the result:
Upgrading google-chrome-stable:amd64 133.0.6943.126-1 133.0.6943.141-1
Upgrading gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0:amd64 1.25.50-1 1.25.90-1
Upgrading gstreamer1.0-tools:amd64 1.25.50-1 1.25.90-1
Upgrading libg
** Description changed:
[Impact]
People upgrading from noble are stuck on the no-longer-available
libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (which has been changed back to libcanberra-gtk3-0 in
oracular).
This is in turn causes them to have an unsupported package installed,
and the new apt solver is prod
** Description changed:
[Impact]
People upgrading from noble are stuck on the no-longer-available
libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (which has been changed back to libcanberra-gtk3-0 in
oracular).
This is in turn causes them to have an unsupported package installed,
and the new apt solver is prod
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libcanberra (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Also affects: libcanberra (Ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => libcanberra
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099829
Title:
libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 still around i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2099829 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099829
This does not reproduce for some reason (did you pass arguments to dist-
upgrade? My solver dump is a bit broken and dumps the solver changes
together with manually specified ones); but suffice it to say, yo
Alright I have a bug in the solver dumper, these actions were scheduled
by it.
Please run `apt install libcanberra-gtk3-0:amd64`, it seems the
replaced `libcanberra-gtk3-0t64` has inadvertently not been replaced
during a release upgrade to oracular (24.10)
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrad
1 - 100 of 1199 matches
Mail list logo
