On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 6:27 PM, wrote:
> ... What I mean by taking over is, when you go on torproject.org, you see
> "Our Projects"...
note that Tor VM is not on that page. ("taking over" Tor VM would not
grant you a spot ;)
>> [virtual box device support]
> Fortunately they fixed that. Every
Does this ask for using a pre existing load balancer solution?
Can the host's firewall be configured to fan out (say round robin
or flow based) the streams (and dns) that it would normally capture
and send to a single TransPort and DNSPort... across multiple Tor's
providing same access ports?
I h
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 12:20 AM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> and...@torproject.is writes:
>
> I was concerned that the graphic should not make people think that
> _no one_ can ever associate them with their browsing when they use
> Tor. I've been taught to think of the GPA threat (and other traffi
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:15:58PM -0500, Mansour Moufid wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Paul Syverson
> wrote:
> > I'm a mere four years behind in putting my work up on the web, and
> > this one wasn't co-authored so nobody else did either. I'll try to do
> > something about that in my
Nice graphic :)
Some small details not worth including...
site.com under HTTPS really means site-IP to various observers
between user and webserver. site-IP may or may not mean site.com
in the presence of virtual hosting schemes.
At the exit and beyond, knowing a site user is using Tor could
be
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Ted Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:20 -0800, Seth David Schoen wrote:
>> I was concerned that the graphic should not make people think that
>> _no one_ can ever associate them with their browsing when they use
>> Tor. I've been taught to think of the GPA t
> > I am interested in overtaking the project TorVM.
>
> I'm not sure what
> you mean by 'taking over' the project. Besides
> having a copy of the source
> archived in svn we aren't associated with
> it.
What I mean by taking over is, when you go on torproject.org, you see "Our
Projects"... Addit
> On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 5:37 PM, wrote:
> >
> ... Nowadays VirtualBox is fully Open Source. It was not in past, but now
> it is. There is a closed source extension package for VirtualBox with stuff
> like rdp, but that is not required. We use only the Open Source edition which
> is available for
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 02:27, Ted Smith wrote:
> I'm not a full-time PET researcher, but smarter people than myself in this
> thread seem to think the GPA is
> more of a myth than a reality.
Using https://metrics.torproject.org/csv/relaycountries.csv:
$ grep 2012-03-05 relaycountries.csv | cut
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:01:36PM +0100, pro...@secure-mail.biz wrote 1.2K
> bytes in 19 lines about:
> : Please tell me the requirements for overtaking
> the project.
>
> Generally, commit code.
That's what we done. Everything is Open Source and documented.
___
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Paul Syverson wrote:
> I'm a mere four years behind in putting my work up on the web, and
> this one wasn't co-authored so nobody else did either. I'll try to do
> something about that in my copious free time this week and send a
> link.
Please do, this attack you
I am delighted that you as one of the original TorVM developers, is answering
this thread. If you are still interested in this project, you are invited to
join us.
> > My project, TorBOX [4] offers the already
> same functionality.
>
> not quite; some differences that drove the original
> Tor VM
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 16:20 -0800, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> and...@torproject.is writes:
>
> > The GPA is in every paper on the topic. But only Seth has the real
> > answer.
>
> I was concerned that the graphic should not make people think that
> _no one_ can ever associate them with their brow
and...@torproject.is writes:
> The GPA is in every paper on the topic. But only Seth has the real
> answer.
I was concerned that the graphic should not make people think that
_no one_ can ever associate them with their browsing when they use
Tor. I've been taught to think of the GPA threat (and
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 11:01 AM, wrote:
> I am interested in overtaking the project TorVM. [1] [2] [3] TorVM has been
> abandoned by it's original authors, no more development and discussions are
> going on for years.
sure.
> My project, TorBOX [4] offers the already same functionality.
not
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:04:11PM -0500, te...@riseup.net wrote 3.5K bytes in
90 lines about:
: The graphic here seems to be the EFF graphic from the OP in this thread.
: Did you mean something else? Or did you mean to say, "there's already
: one story using this graphic as proof that the NSA can
> I am interested in overtaking the project TorVM.
I'm not sure what you mean by 'taking over' the project. Besides
having a copy of the source archived in svn we aren't associated with
it.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 08:01:36PM +0100, pro...@secure-mail.biz wrote 1.2K
bytes in 19 lines about:
: Please tell me the requirements for overtaking the project.
Generally, commit code.
--
Andrew
http://tpo.is/contact
pgp 0x74ED336B
___
tor-talk mail
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 23:04, Paul Syverson wrote:
> The suggestion was that people _stop_ working on
> defeating the GPA, which is unrealistic as both too strong (global)
> and too weak (passive).
While this may be true in the theoretical sense, it doesn't mean that
one can't make correlation at
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 04:04:10PM -0500, syver...@itd.nrl.navy.mil wrote 1.5K
bytes in 33 lines about:
: Is that a typo? The suggestion was that people _stop_ working on
Yes, I meant stop. When skynet achieves consciousness, the analysis of
traffic on the Internet will be the least of our proble
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 11:31:02AM -0500, e...@riseup.net wrote 1.8K bytes in
55 lines about:
:
: I've recently started seeing pairs of in-country nodes in the network
: map. I recall reading that that for security reasons only one node in
: each country would be indicated, except when a circuit
On 03/06/2012 05:13 PM, Anne Magarey wrote:
> For the last 3 days, every time I try to start Orbot to run Tor on my
> android phone, I get the message
We can take this off list, Anne (just reply to this w/o cc'ing
tor-talk). Happy to help you out.
First, have you tried uninstalling/re-installing?
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this question. Please
tell me where to send it if it's not.
For the last 3 days, every time I try to start Orbot to run Tor on my
android phone, I get the message
Unable to start Tor: broken pipe.
How can I fix this, please?
Anne
__
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 12:22:16PM -0500, Andrew Lewman wrote:
>
> At PETS in 2009[0], Paul did a talk on 'why I'm not an entropist' and
> suggested that people need to start working on defeating a mythical
> global passive adversary. Maybe in the near future some government will
> have the capabi
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 12:22 -0500, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:22:33 -0500
> Ted Smith wrote:
> > While I like the graphic overall, I think the "NSA as a global passive
> > adversary" element is an example of the graphic being overloaded with
> > information that will confuse/sca
I am interested in overtaking the project TorVM. [1] [2] [3] TorVM has been
abandoned by it's original authors, no more development and discussions are
going on for years.
My project, TorBOX [4] offers the already same functionality. And it offers
even more. Almost all key features are ready an
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 11:22:33 -0500
Ted Smith wrote:
> While I like the graphic overall, I think the "NSA as a global passive
> adversary" element is an example of the graphic being overloaded with
> information that will confuse/scare away most people.
So far, there is one story where Eva claims
On 6 March 2012 04:55, Seth David Schoen wrote:
> https://www.eff.org/pages/tor-and-https
Excellent stuff, thank you!
In particular well done for keeping it at just the right level of
complexity and not overloading it with information that will
confuse/scare away most people.
I like the idea o
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 15:38 +, ix4...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> In particular well done for keeping it at just the right level of
> complexity and not overloading it with information that will
> confuse/scare away most people.
While I like the graphic overall, I think the "NSA as a global passive
Nice, I like it very much.
It also demonstrates the need for DNSCrypt, then "site.com" would also
disappear from a few places.
Can you release the source code for the demonstration? That would allow other
to build up on your work. Other things like DNSCrypt, distributed DNS,
alternative web of
- Forwarded message from David Reid -
From: David Reid
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 21:26:49 -0800
To: Tahoe-LAFS development
Subject: Re: [tahoe-dev] Idea for a Publish/Subscribe Message System on
Tahoe-LAFS
Reply-To: Tahoe-LAFS development
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 11:08 AM, darrob
31 matches
Mail list logo
