On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 02:04:11PM -0500, te...@riseup.net wrote 3.5K bytes in 90 lines about: : The graphic here seems to be the EFF graphic from the OP in this thread. : Did you mean something else? Or did you mean to say, "there's already : one story using this graphic as proof that the NSA can break Tor"?
The latter. English fail on my part. : It is true that Tor is weak against a global passive adversary, but : there's no reason, from my point of view, to include that in material : geared towards non-PET researchers. Maybe Seth could comment on why the : EFF decided it was necessary to include it? The GPA is in every paper on the topic. But only Seth has the real answer. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
