On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 12:03:42PM -0500, Vladimir Támara Patiño wrote:
> Thanks to Stefan and Martin for encouragment, I will find time to apply
> in current following your suggestions, but I cannot so soon. Sorry
> for mangling of previous, if someone wants to try before, I'm
> sending again bu
Hi!
Noone reads this, so noone noticed, but it's just weird.
--
Martin Pelikan
Index: sync.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/dhcpd/sync.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -p -r1.10 sync.c
--- sync.c 23 Dec 2010 17:38:04 -
Anyone want to OK and commit?
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 05:19:18PM -0500, David Hill wrote:
>O_NONBLOCK is set with F_SETFL
>
>Index: usr.sbin/faithd/tcp.c
>===
>RCS file: /cvs/src/usr.sbin/faithd/tcp.c,v
>retrieving revision 1.12
>dif
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 03:37:32PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> In dhclient.conf.5 at two places,
> text is (unnecessarily IMHO) indented
> in a way mandoc -Tlint complains about.
>
> Jan
>
> /usr/src/sbin/dhclient/dhclient.conf.5:299:6: WARNING: tab in non-literal
> context
> /usr/src/sbin/d
On 9 February 2013 16:27, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> So I think the vr(4) diff has had a reasonable amount of testing;
> any objections or ideally OKs to commit it?
>
OK
> I have also tested sis(4) on a PC Engines WRAP now; despite the
> DP83815 datasheet indicating that "Accept Long Packets"
> (
So I think the vr(4) diff has had a reasonable amount of testing;
any objections or ideally OKs to commit it?
I have also tested sis(4) on a PC Engines WRAP now; despite the
DP83815 datasheet indicating that "Accept Long Packets"
(SIS_RXCFG_RX_JABBER) should permit frames up to 2046 it seems
somet
