Good to know! Thanks for googling for me!
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-11-20 19:26 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl :
> > https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/
> commit/debian/extra/pam.d/systemd-user?id=b3238e9604fa61c7ec45a2d0acc1f8
> b40728cd87
> >
>
2017-11-20 19:26 GMT+01:00 Michael Biebl :
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/debian/extra/pam.d/systemd-user?id=b3238e9604fa61c7ec45a2d0acc1f8b40728cd87
>
> This might be relevant to you.
>
> See how the pam config contains pam_limits
This was a result of
https://bugs
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/commit/debian/extra/pam.d/systemd-user?id=b3238e9604fa61c7ec45a2d0acc1f8b40728cd87
This might be relevant to you.
See how the pam config contains pam_limits
2017-11-20 18:49 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mo, 20.11.17 09:47, Jeff Solomo
On Mo, 20.11.17 09:47, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote:
> I guess the answer is "no." :)
>
> This is Ubuntu 16.04. On CentOS7.3, pam_limits is part of systemd-user
> through system-auth
>
> Here is /etc/pam.d/systemd-user from my Ubuntu system:
>
> # This file is part of systemd.
>
I have checked the snippets. "common-account" only deal with account
settings. "common-session-interactive" does not include a pam_limits entry.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mo, 20.11.17 09:47, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote:
>
> > I guess the answ
I guess the answer is "no." :)
This is Ubuntu 16.04. On CentOS7.3, pam_limits is part of systemd-user
through system-auth
Here is /etc/pam.d/systemd-user from my Ubuntu system:
# This file is part of systemd.
#
# Used by systemd --user instances.
@include common-account
session required pam_s
Lennart,
Your explanation sounds great but it's just not what I'm seeing.
My [email protected] has "PAMName=systemd-user" in the [Service] section.
I have setup limits for the user in /etc/security/limits.d/foo.conf.
I have no other limit overrides in any other systemd file.
Whether I reboot or "s
On Mo, 20.11.17 09:20, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote:
> Lennart,
>
> Your explanation sounds great but it's just not what I'm seeing.
>
> My [email protected] has "PAMName=systemd-user" in the [Service] section.
>
> I have setup limits for the user in /etc/security/limits.d/foo.conf.
On Mo, 20.11.17 08:32, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote:
> I am using lingering and I have issued "systemctl restart user@" and
> then seen the instance restart with a new PID. So I think I am restarting
> the user instance.
>
> When Limit* directives are applied in "[email protected]" or
I am using lingering and I have issued "systemctl restart user@" and
then seen the instance restart with a new PID. So I think I am restarting
the user instance.
When Limit* directives are applied in "[email protected]" or in
"/etc/systemd/system/[email protected]/whatever.conf" I see that they are
resp
On So, 19.11.17 16:57, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote:
> > I didn't think that systemd paid one bit of attention to the settings
> >> controlled by pam_limits?
> >>
> >
> > The user@ instance runs user-controlled processes, much like cron would,
> > so its service unit has PAM enabled
> I didn't think that systemd paid one bit of attention to the settings
>> controlled by pam_limits?
>>
>
> The user@ instance runs user-controlled processes, much like cron would,
> so its service unit has PAM enabled as well.
>
When I change pam_limits for a user via a file /etc/security/limits.
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017, 02:27 Jeff Solomon wrote:
> Understood.
>
> I didn't think that systemd paid one bit of attention to the settings
> controlled by pam_limits?
>
The user@ instance runs user-controlled processes, much like cron would, so
its service unit has PAM enabled as well.
> I'm only
Understood.
I didn't think that systemd paid one bit of attention to the settings
controlled by pam_limits?
I'm only interested in a user instance that is lingering and operates
outside of a session.
My goal is that the child processes of the user instance will have limits
that I set. If I under
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017, 22:01 Jeff Solomon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Two questions.
>
> I want to raise the "number of files" limits for the user instance.
>
> First, I set DefaultLimitNOFILE to something higher than the global system
> default in /etc/systemd/user.conf and I rebooted.
>
> Then I confirmed
Hi,
Two questions.
I want to raise the "number of files" limits for the user instance.
First, I set DefaultLimitNOFILE to something higher than the global system
default in /etc/systemd/user.conf and I rebooted.
Then I confirmed that the setting has taken effect:
"systemctl --user show" showed
16 matches
Mail list logo
