On Mo, 20.11.17 09:47, Jeff Solomon ([email protected]) wrote: > I guess the answer is "no." :) > > This is Ubuntu 16.04. On CentOS7.3, pam_limits is part of systemd-user > through system-auth > > Here is /etc/pam.d/systemd-user from my Ubuntu system: > > # This file is part of systemd. > # > # Used by systemd --user instances. > > @include common-account > > session required pam_selinux.so close > session required pam_selinux.so nottys open > @include common-session-noninteractive > session optional pam_systemd.so
Have you checked the snippets listed in the @include lines? Maybe they pull it in? > So on RHEL systems, it doesn't matter that is works because user instances > are officially not included and it just doesn't work on Ubuntu because > pam_limits is not used by systemd-user. > > I find it odd that two major distros differ in this behavior. PAM is a mess. Setups and syntax vary wildly between distros. It's sad. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
