On Mon, Nov 20, 2017, 02:27 Jeff Solomon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Understood. > > I didn't think that systemd paid one bit of attention to the settings > controlled by pam_limits? > The user@ instance runs user-controlled processes, much like cron would, so its service unit has PAM enabled as well. > I'm only interested in a user instance that is lingering and operates > outside of a session. > They always run outside of a session, even if the start was triggered by session creation. > > My goal is that the child processes of the user instance will have limits > that I set. If I understand correctly, if those limits are to be higher > than the system's hard limits, then the user instance itself must have > those higher limits set on it, yes? > Yes, since it's a regular user process with the same user privileges as those child processes. -- Mantas Mikulėnas <[email protected]> Sent from my phone
_______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
