Re: [SM-USERS] ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: SELECT ''

2004-04-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Hello, > I started seeing a really goofy problem on my FreeBSD 5.2 box. > Seemingly randomly, I'll get this message while moving or deleting > multiple messages: > > ERROR: > ERROR : Could not complete request. > Query: SELECT "" > Reason Given: Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to.

Re: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Seth Randall
Matt, I just took a look at the email you sent earlier in the week. All of the spamassassin tests that your example failed were tests on the Recieved line (hence the RCVD_IN test names). A brief (and not hugely thorough look) at the Spamassassin source doesn't turn up any tests against a IP addre

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Avery Day
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote: >> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for >> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is >> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I >> would >> lo

[SM-USERS] plugin mail_fetchmail : invalid user

2004-04-07 Thread Kenneth Ling
when I keyin the info on userid, password and server.. after press submit will display a msg call invalid user please advise tq -- regard Kenneth Ling --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial pres

[SM-USERS] Compatiblilty and Webcalendar Plugin

2004-04-07 Thread Uma Shankar
Hi, I have two issues. I am running SM 1.4.1 on a Macos 10.3.3 server. I am unable to use the compatibility plugin to use the change LDAP password. It gives a PHP error in line 50. Also I would like to use the Webcalendar Plugin with 1.4.1. If it does work, where can I download the plugin?

RE: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Gerry Doris
On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Whitelists that are address based are more insecure. It is not cheating at > all. The purpose of the DYNALIST feature in SORBS and others to detect large > bulk-spammers that hail form dynamic IPs that can't be easily shut-down. > Email from SquirrelM

Re: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Jim George
Tomas Kuliavas said: >>> SquirrelMail 1.4.3cvs adds User-Agent and X-Mailer. By doing it >>> SquirrelMail risks to get +40 points in some German SA installs. >>> SquirrelMail 1.5 adds only User-Agent: header. SquirrelMail 1.4-STABLE >>> will keep both headers until SA stable version with 20_head_t

Re: [SM-USERS] Delete Attachments ONLY

2004-04-07 Thread Graeme
Marc Groot Koerkamp said: > Daniel Watts said: >> Hi guys - can you think of a way whereby users can delete attachments >> but >> keep the email itself? This allows a greater flexibility in storage >> management for users with limited quotas. >> > > Currently that is not possible. The only way to r

Re: [SM-USERS] cookie name conflict

2004-04-07 Thread Will Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using squirrelmail ver 1.2 I am having trouble with the set cookie key name. My site uses a cooike with a name of 'key' How would I change the name value of SquirrelMails cookie name value of 'key' to another name $var like mail_key I believe that the domain field

RE: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread spandox
Whitelists that are address based are more insecure. It is not cheating at all. The purpose of the DYNALIST feature in SORBS and others to detect large bulk-spammers that hail form dynamic IPs that can't be easily shut-down. Email from SquirrelMail is just not the case - it is a single user sendin

Re: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Matt Gostick
No,It seems SquirrelMail adds the dialup IP as part of the msgid. SpamAssassin is parsing that IP from the msgid and flagging it as spam because of dialup. I posted a message about this a couple of days ago, but no-one gave a decent response. I have grep'd/awk'd through my maillog and it seems t

[SM-USERS] cookie name conflict

2004-04-07 Thread bmbol
I am using squirrelmail ver 1.2 I am having trouble with the set cookie key name. My site uses a cooike with a name of 'key' How would I change the name value of SquirrelMails cookie name value of 'key' to another name $var like mail_key thanks __ Do you Yahoo!?

[SM-USERS] Not sending

2004-04-07 Thread adrian
Hi I have squirrel 1.5.0 and am using a no NAT ADSL connection to a server in our offices. The server runs a redhat 7.2 distro called SME server. It has Apache and PHP 4.1.3. We have been using Squirrel for a couple of years with no problems until a new router and DSL at the client side stops

[SM-USERS] ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: SELECT ""

2004-04-07 Thread Brian DeRosa
Hello, I started seeing a really goofy problem on my FreeBSD 5.2 box. Seemingly randomly, I'll get this message while moving or deleting multiple messages: ERROR: ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: SELECT "" Reason Given: Mailbox does not exist, or must be subscribed to. It doesn't matt

Re: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
>> SquirrelMail 1.4.3cvs adds User-Agent and X-Mailer. By doing it >> SquirrelMail risks to get +40 points in some German SA installs. >> SquirrelMail 1.5 adds only User-Agent: header. SquirrelMail 1.4-STABLE >> will keep both headers until SA stable version with 20_head_tests.cf >> bugfix is relea

Re: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Jim George
Tomas Kuliavas said: >> Big subject line but what the heck. >> >> When I send email from SquirrelMail to friends who use spamassassin >> it gets marked as spam. > >> 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS >> [xx.xx.xx.xxx listed in dnsbl.sorbs

Re: [SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Big subject line but what the heck. > > When I send email from SquirrelMail to friends who use spamassassin > it gets marked as spam. > 2.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS RBL: SORBS: sender is listed in SORBS > [xx.xx.xx.xxx listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] > 2.5 RCVD_IN_DYNABLOC

[SM-USERS] Spamassassin, SORBS, Dynamic IPs and SquirrelMail and quick kludge fix

2004-04-07 Thread spandox
Big subject line but what the heck. When I send email from SquirrelMail to friends who use spamassassin it gets marked as spam. Example: (IPs and usernames xed out to protect my interests) Content analysis details: (5.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description --

[SM-USERS] Re: ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server.

2004-04-07 Thread Gary Taylor
> The next step is to be sure you've got Courier listening to port 993 as a > dedicated TLS port, you shouldn't get much of > anything after the Connected to.. and Escape character lines. > It reads from localhost as follows: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ telnet localhost 993 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connecte

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 07:45:09AM -0700, Avery Day wrote: > > I have looked at both cyrus and courier. The complete blackbox setup that > cyrus can do seems to be its major selling point. Also the extremely flexible ACL system (best I've seen of any IMAP server, open or proprietary). The delive

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Avery Day
> Avery Day wrote: >> postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server [...] >> We are looking at going completely >> webmail based for the MUA in our company using squirrelmail. We have >> around 35 users and only 6 gigs of email. My guess is we send and >> receive >> as a whole on

[SM-USERS] squirrelmail imap problem

2004-04-07 Thread Tim DeBoer
Hi everyone, I've been trying to get Squirrelmail running on my system, but I'm getting nowwhere with this particular error. I'm running squirrelmail on FreeBSD4.8, squirrelmail version 1.4.2 ERROR Error connecting to IMAP server: . 2 : No such file or directory I have imap enabled in inetd.conf

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Avery Day
> Quoting Avery Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > [snip] >> I will be running this server on a PE2650, raid 5, single xeon 2.4Ghz, >> with 1 gig of ram. I think this server can handle what I need it for >> easy >> enough. Does anyone see this differently? >> >> Advise is very welcome, so please don't he

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Avery Day
>> The company I work for has been running exchange 5.5. We have had >> corrupt >> databases multiple times with this exchange server. It has been decided >> that this exchange server needs to be replaced. I have setup a >> postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server and have >>

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Avery Day
> >> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote: >>> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for >>> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is >>> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I >>> woul

Re: [SM-USERS] Delete Attachments ONLY

2004-04-07 Thread Marc Groot Koerkamp
Daniel Watts said: > Hi guys - can you think of a way whereby users can delete attachments but > keep the email itself? This allows a greater flexibility in storage > management for users with limited quotas. > Currently that is not possible. The only way to remove attachments from a mail is recon

Re: [SM-USERS] utlility app for importing text Addressbook

2004-04-07 Thread Nino Novak
On Wednesday 07 April 2004 13:35, C.B. Currier wrote: > I want to convert the addressbooks that I host that are used in VER > 1.2.8 to mysql. > > Did anyone develop a utility for this ? First read this http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/AddressbookDatabase you may also tryout (and modify) thi

Re: [SM-USERS] 553 and language

2004-04-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> Additionally languages will not change I've tried with sqm 1.42 and > 1.5 http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/en_US/SupportingMultipleLanguages What OS? Does php has gettext support? Are you running php in safe mode? Have you installed locale packages for 1.5.0? There is a link to them at h

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-07 Thread p dont think
> What is the status of these tools? > > I saw that the TMDA plugin had been moved to obsolete & a reference is > made to TMDA tools but cannot find them. > > I have TMDA working great on the incoming with qmail but outgoing I have > not gotten working with SM & was hoping to find

Re: [SM-USERS] Re: ERROR : Connection dropped by imap-server.

2004-04-07 Thread Chris Hilts
> One thing that puzzles med is the message is the syslog "Apr 5 23:57:53 > old- > geezer imapd-ssl: couriertls: accept: error:140760FC:SSL > routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol" > The reason being is that SSL23 I believe the ssh port 23; so are courier > and squirrelmail having a dis

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:52:47AM -0700, p dont think wrote: > Yes, the two are fairly independent. There is a problem in that the > outgoing addresses created by the tmda-sendmail wrapper may not be > "reply-able", depending on your system setup. > > The current TMDA plugin has been deprecated

[SM-USERS] 553 and language

2004-04-07 Thread Graham Rimmington
I get this error when sending messages Requested action not taken: mailbox name not allowed Server replied: 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Sender address rejected: not logged in as owner I use squirrel mail on my own homepage no problem. But at this friends homepage I get this error, both homepages a

[SM-USERS] Delete Attachments ONLY

2004-04-07 Thread Daniel Watts
Hi guys - can you think of a way whereby users can delete attachments but keep the email itself? This allows a greater flexibility in storage management for users with limited quotas. Let me know if I'm missing something obvious - I did a quick search for "delete attachment" but found nothing (am

[SM-USERS] utlility app for importing text Addressbook

2004-04-07 Thread C.B. Currier
I want to convert the addressbooks that I host that are used in VER 1.2.8 to mysql. Did anyone develop a utility for this ? -- C.B. Currier --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel

Re: [SM-USERS] TMDA

2004-04-07 Thread C.B. Currier
What is the status of these tools? I saw that the TMDA plugin had been moved to obsolete & a reference is made to TMDA tools but cannot find them. I have TMDA working great on the incoming with qmail but outgoing I have not gotten working with SM & was hoping to find or develop some better functi

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Paul Elliott
> On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote: >> Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for >> the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is >> there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I >> would >> lov

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Tilman Schmidt
Avery Day wrote: postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server [...] We are looking at going completely webmail based for the MUA in our company using squirrelmail. We have around 35 users and only 6 gigs of email. My guess is we send and receive as a whole on average about 300 emai

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 10:44:16PM -0700, Avery Day wrote: > Does anyone think going completely webmail based using squirrelmail for > the MUA is a bad idea? Does anyone have any thoughts on this at all? Is > there anyone in this mailing list that has done this before? If so I would > love to hear

Re: [SM-USERS] Fatal error"Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in/internet/www/home/gary/squirrelmail-1.4.2/functions/imap_mailbox.ph p online 641

2004-04-07 Thread p dont think
> > I am using apache-2.0.48, IMAP-2001, PHP-4.2.2. I use mod_ssl also for the > apache. SquirrelMail version is 1.4.2. I have changed the > max_execution_time > from 30 to 120 in php.ini, but it still hangs when click on the "folder" > link. When I said hangs, I mean it is loading f

Re: [SM-USERS] Attachments get corrupted

2004-04-07 Thread p dont think
> SquirrelMail 1.4.2 > PHP 4.3.4 > UWIMAPD (IMAP4rev1 2002.325-cpanel) > Apache 1.3.29 > RedHat 7.3 > I sent some messages today with attachments, and the files arrived > unreadable, perhaps corrupted. Try deactivating all plugins. If this fixes it, you have extraneous

Re: [SM-USERS] (no subject)

2004-04-07 Thread p dont think
>Does anybody have the tar ball of the Ldap Password Change > Plug-in Vers 1.0, and 1.2? Since it is no longer available on the site Here ya go... - Paul change_ldappass.1.0-1.0.1.tar.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data change_ldappass-1.2.tar.gz Description: GNU Z

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
Quoting Avery Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [snip] > I will be running this server on a PE2650, raid 5, single xeon 2.4Ghz, > with 1 gig of ram. I think this server can handle what I need it for easy > enough. Does anyone see this differently? > > Advise is very welcome, so please don't hesitate. > E

Re: [SM-USERS] Squirrelmail as the only MUA

2004-04-07 Thread Tomas Kuliavas
> The company I work for has been running exchange 5.5. We have had corrupt > databases multiple times with this exchange server. It has been decided > that this exchange server needs to be replaced. I have setup a > postfix+procmail+dovcot-imap+spamassassin+squirrelmail server and have > migrated