Tomas Kuliavas said: >>> SquirrelMail 1.4.3cvs adds User-Agent and X-Mailer. By doing it >>> SquirrelMail risks to get +40 points in some German SA installs. >>> SquirrelMail 1.5 adds only User-Agent: header. SquirrelMail 1.4-STABLE >>> will keep both headers until SA stable version with 20_head_tests.cf >>> bugfix is released. >> >> isn't this 'cheating' spamassassin users? Surely the correct way to >> handle this is to ask the spamassassin user to 'whitelist' you by asking >> them to add the following to their user_prefs: >> whitelist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes, we are cheating. Or choosing alternative that would cause less > trouble. > > correct way is to ask to fix their SA install. One line added and two > lines modified. Whitelisting would work only for one user and > > * Some SA installs does not allow whitelisting in user's prefs. > * Some SA installs does not use user's prefs at all. > * Some SA installs are not controlled by end user. > > SA people fixed the bug in HEAD, closed entry in bugzilla and haven't > ported it to stable. I don't know SA release schedule and procedures. If > they plan to release 2.6.4, ask them to port the bugfix to 2.6.4. I am not > going to file same bug again. > > -- > Tomas > The noise you can hear is me winding my neck in ;)
-- Best Regards, Jim George Thanks for reading this email. ----------------------------------------- This email was sent using SquirrelMail. "Webmail for nuts!" http://squirrelmail.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click -- squirrelmail-users mailing list List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] List Archives: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995 List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users
