On Wed, 7 Apr 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Whitelists that are address based are more insecure.  It is not cheating at
> all. The purpose of the DYNALIST feature in SORBS and others to detect large
> bulk-spammers that hail form dynamic IPs that can't be easily shut-down.
> Email from SquirrelMail is just not the case - it is a single user sending a
> single user email. The fact that it came from a web-site is irrelevant. It
> is like saying it is cheating to use your ISPs SMTP server - you should run
> one yourself so that your home machine's PC's IP address appears.

My understanding of the DYNABLOCK list is that it has been created to
target those DSL/cable modem users who are running their own email
servers.  It has been found that these are often misconfigured or open
relays.  These systems are the source for a large amount of grief (ie spam
or network problems).

DYNABLOCK is supported by many ISP's since running servers on their
networks is often against their end user agreement.  It is the ISP who
takes the flames when people complain about garbage orginating from their
ip blocks.  Guess who's other users complain when the network is messed
up.  Also, it is not unknown for some residential DSL/cable modem users to
offer email service for a fee in direct competition to their ISP.

The SpamAssassin rules are not supposed to be triggered if mail is relayed
through the ISP's mail server...just if it is sent directly to the
internet.

-- 
Gerry

"The lyfe so short, the craft so long to learne"  Chaucer


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
--
squirrelmail-users mailing list
List Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List Archives:  http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=2995
List Info: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/squirrelmail-users

Reply via email to