I recently was attempting to upgrade from Solr 4.8.1 to Solr 5.4.1 but had
to abort due to average response times degraded from a baseline volume
performance test. The affected queries involved faceting (both enum method
and default) and grouping. There is a critical bug
https://issues.apache.org
6.n3.nabble.com/Indexing-a-File-attached-to-a-document-tp4276334.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Does anyone know the answer to this?
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Solr User wrote:
> I recently was attempting to upgrade from Solr 4.8.1 to Solr 5.4.1 but had
> to abort due to average response times degraded from a baseline volume
> performance test. The affected queries involved
pse/Expand can meet your applications
> needs rather Grouping. It allows you to specify using a top level
> FieldCache if performance is a blocker without it.
>
>
>
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 10:42 AM, Solr User wrote:
.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ON
> >> facet API and eliminating the use of enum meets your performance needs.
> >>
> >> With the CollapsingQParserPlugin top_fc is definitely faster during
> >> queries. The tradeoff is slower warming times and increased memory usage
> >> if
> &g
t; This can be interesting.
> if you proceed with your investigations and discover what changed in the
> deletion approach, I would be more than happy to help!
>
> Cheers
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Solr User wrote:
>
> > Thanks again for your work
olr 4, the snapshot is restored since Solr 4 will not
load with a Solr 5 index. Testing Solr 4 after reverting yields the same
results as the previous Solr 4 test.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-09-27 at 15:08 -0500, Solr User wrote:
> > Further tes
I plan to re-test this in a separate environment that I have more control
over and will share the results when I can.
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Solr User wrote:
> Certainly. And I would of course welcome anyone else to test this for
> themselves especially with facet.method=uif
5251
On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Solr User wrote:
> I plan to re-test this in a separate environment that I have more control
> over and will share the results when I can.
>
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Solr User wrote:
>
>> Certainly. And I would of course welco
This is mostly just an FYI regarding future work on issues like SOLR-8792.
I wanted admin update but world read on ZK since I do not have anything
sensitive from a read perspective in the Solr data and did not want to
force all SolrCloud clients to implement authentication just for read. So,
I ex
For those interested, I ended up bundling the customized ACL provider with
the solr.war. I could not stomach looking at the stack trace in the logs.
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Solr User wrote:
> This is mostly just an FYI regarding future work on issues like SOLR-8792.
>
> I wan
$I = 100;
my $N = $S*$I + $I;
my $i;
print "\n";
for($i=$S*$I; $i<$N; $i++) {
print "SP${i}cat
hard drive ${i}\n";
}
print "\n";
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 2:14 AM, Rick Leir wrote:
> Can you reproduce this error? What are the steps you take to rep
Is it possible to setup Solr security to allow anonymous query (/select
etc.) but restricted access to other permissions as described in
https://lucidworks.com/2015/08/17/securing-solr-basic-auth-permission-rules/
?
ole":"allgen"}]
> } }
>
>
> ...and then assign the "allgen" role to all users
>
> This allows a select without a login & password, but requires a login &
> password for anything else (including the front page of the GUI)
>
> -
Not sure if it helps beyond the steps to reproduce that I supplied above,
but I also see that "Omit Term Frequencies & Positions" is still set on the
field according to the LukeRequestHandler:
ITS--OF--
On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Solr User wrote:
> Sorry for
I am pleased to report that we are in Production on Solr 5.5.3 with
comparable performance to Solr 4.8.1 through leveraging facet.method=uif as
well as https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176. Thanks to
everyone who worked on these!
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Solr User wrote
This is in regards to changing a field type from string to
text_en_splitting, re-indexing all documents, even optimizing to give the
index a chance to merge segments and rewrite itself entirely, and then
getting this error when running a phrase query:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: field "blah" w
and the
primary searcher would then wait xxx milliseconds and return with whatever
the other shards had sent back. Is that correct?
thanks in advance
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/does-shards-tolerant-deal-with-this-scenario-tp4125300.html
Sent from the Solr
-for-fort-st-john-to-match-ft-saint-john-tp4127231.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
na/Former Fort Ord")
(note that my terms/understanding of how this works may be incorrect, hence
my request for assistance/understanding)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-do-I-get-search-for-fort-st-john-to-match-ft-saint-john-tp4127231p4127764.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
n" and "ft saint john"
and "fort st john"?
My Solr 4.6.1 instance doesn't. I am wondering if synonyms just don't work
for all/some words in a phrase
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-do-I-get-search-for-fort-st-john-to-m
hes for "ft st john" or "fort st john"
or ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-do-I-get-search-for-fort-st-john-to-match-ft-saint-john-tp4127231p4128640.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
time) and see if I can write a subword synonym plugin of some sort to
perform this type of synonyming
thanks anyhow.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-do-I-get-search-for-fort-st-john-to-match-ft-saint-john-tp4127231p4128914.html
Sent from the Solr - User
-IllegalStateException-Cannot-call-tp4087342p4107286.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
...
*:*
State:WY
any help appreciated
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-it-possible-to-consolidate-filterquery-cache-strings-tp4121005.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
note: by partitioning I mean that I have sharded the 120M docs into 9 Solr
partitions (each on a separate server)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-it-possible-to-consolidate-filterquery-cache-strings-tp4121005p4121012.html
Sent from the Solr - User
would not breaking the FQs out by state be faster for warming up the fq
caches?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-it-possible-to-consolidate-filterquery-cache-strings-tp4121005p4121030.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Are-there-any-Java-versions-we-should-avoid-with-Solr-tp4121164.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-log-files-in-Tomcat-tp4168587.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
awesome Mike. that does exactly what I want.
many thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-do-I-stop-queries-from-being-logged-in-two-different-log-files-in-Tomcat-tp4168587p4168597.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
66.n3.nabble.com/confused-about-how-to-set-a-solr-query-timeout-when-using-tomcat-tp4171363.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/confused-about-how-to-set-a-solr-query-timeout-when-using-tomcat-tp4171363p4171368.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
something, let me know
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/confused-about-how-to-set-a-solr-query-timeout-when-using-tomcat-tp4171363p4171379.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
status=0 QTime=2
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-tp4173602p4173618.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602p4173627.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
olr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602p4173831.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
\Master\solr\coreX\
1503 [main] INFO org.apache.solr.core.CoresLocator û Found 2 core
definitions
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602p4173832.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
-tp4173602p4173839.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Chris, will get the schema and solrconfig ready for uploading.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602p4173840.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
mehow; mea culpa.
Anyhow, I really appreciate the responses/help I got on this issue. many
thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602p4174118.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
multiple slave searchers
per indexer.
any thoughts on this would be appreciated
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-does-this-write-lock-does-not-exist-mean-tp4175291.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.nabble.com/Solr-4-10-2-Found-core-but-I-get-No-cores-available-in-dashboard-page-tp4173602p4175423.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
SOLR reports the term occurrence for terms over all the documents. I am
having trouble making a query that returns the term occurrence in a
specific page field called, documentPageId.
I don't know how to issue a proper SOLR query that returns a word count for
a paragraph of text such as the term "
search for word frequency for a page in a document
that has many pages. So I can report to the user that the term/word
occurred on page 1 "10" times. The user can click on the result and go
right the the page where the word/term appeared most frequently.
What do you mean an XY p
er
> document you'll be getting into some pretty low-level analysis
> of the data to accomplish this.
>
> Sorry I can't be more help.
> Erick
>
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 5:35 PM, solr user wrote:
> > See comments inline below.
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 22, 2
0 down vote favorite
share [fb] share [tw]
What is the proper query URL to limit the term frequency to just one term
in a document?
Below is an example query to search for the term frequency in a document,
but it is returning the frequency for all the terms.
[
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/
With the Solr search relevancy functions, a ParseException, unknown
function ttf in FunctionQuery.
http://localhost:8983/solr/select/?fl=score,documentPageId&defType=func&q=ttf(contents,amplifiers)
where contents is a field name, and amplifiers is text in the field name.
Just curious why I get a
uble
quotes in the strdist function), but no success.
Any ideas?? Is there a better way to accomplish this sorting??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/can-t-use-strdist-as-functionquery-tp1023390p1023390.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hose that dont).
Appreciate any help or advice someone can offer on this
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/can-t-use-strdist-as-functionquery-tp1023390p1032200.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I change the third argument, etc.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/can-t-use-strdist-as-functionquery-tp1023390p1032231.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ctionquery-tp1023390p1057056.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
/can-t-use-strdist-as-functionquery-tp1023390p1058059.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ch-1.5-dev/' message.
Any help would be great
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-update-solr-to-older-1-5-builds-instead-of-to-trunk-tp1113863p1113863.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
pain
Is there any way to get a set of builds with versions prior to 3.x??
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-update-solr-to-older-1-5-builds-instead-of-to-trunk-tp1113863p1114353.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
no, once upgraded I wouldnt need to have an older solr read the indexes.
misunderstood the note.
thx
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/how-to-update-solr-to-older-1-5-builds-instead-of-to-trunk-tp1113863p1115694.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
I did apply the SOLR-1297-2.patch supplied by Koji Sekiguchi but
it didn't seem to help.
I am using solr 903398 2010-01-26 20:21:09Z.
Any suggestions appreciated.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-in-sorting-by-Function-tp1118235p1118235.html
small typo in last email: second sum should have been hsin, but I notice
that the problem also occurs when I leave it as sum
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-in-sorting-by-Function-tp1118235p1118260.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list
ng-by-Function-tp1118235p1120017.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
issue resolve. problem was that solr.war was silently not being overwritten
by new version.
will try to spend more time debugging before posting.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/possible-bug-in-sorting-by-Function-tp1118235p1121349.html
Sent from the Solr
Retry-INFO-messages-tp1453417p1453417.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
boosting on a specific field like
title?
Thanks,
Solr User
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:26 AM, wrote:
> Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
> solr-user@lucene.apache.org mailing list.
>
> I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
> at solr-use
boosting on a specific field like
title?
Thanks,
Solr User
as the first item in the results.
Adding boost attribute to the title field and Index time boosting did not
change the search results. I tried Query time boosting also as mentioned
below but no luck
/select?q=Each+Little+Bird+That+Sings&title^9&fl=score
Any help to fix this issue would be r
the searchFields field not in any other fields.
I request you all to clarify if anything wrong with my schema.xml. The
schema.xml is at the bottom of this email.
I am not able to get the boosting working on the title field. Please help me
here too.
Thanks,
Solr User
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 5:11
searchFields field and what do I need to specify
in the defaultSearchField tag?
searchFields is one of the field names that we provided.
Thanks,
Solr User
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> >
> select/?q=built+to+last&defType=dismax&qf=searchFields^0.2+ti
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-a-way-to-prevent-abusing-rows-parameter-tp4021467.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/is-there-a-way-to-prevent-abusing-rows-parameter-tp4021467p4021892.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.1-2012-11-03_18-05-49 1405392 - hudson - 2012-11-03 18:06:50
(aka apache-solr-4.1-2012-11-03_18-05-49)
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/upgrading-from-4-0-to-4-1-causes-CorruptIndexException-checksum-mismatch-in-segments-file-tp4021913.html
Sent from the So
would help me
with the conversion?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/spatial-searches-and-geo-json-data-tp4026140.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Does anyone have a blog, wiki with detailed step by step instructions on
setting up SOLRCloud on multiple JBOSS instances?
Thanks in advance,
Hi,
We are planning to move the search of one of our listing based portal to
solr/lucene search server from sphinx search server. But we are facing a
challenge is porting customized sorting being used in our portal. We only
have last 60 days of data live.The algorithm is as follows:-
1. Put a
ab the next batch of ads, you go group.offset=1 etc etc.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> On 26. apr. 2012, at 08:10, solr user wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are plannin
Hi,
Any suggestions,
Am I trying to do too much with solr? Is there any other search engine,
which should be used here?
I am looking into solr codebase and planning to modify QueryComponent. Will
this be the right approach?
Regards,
Shivam
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:48 AM, solr user wrote
ndler and trying to understand what
changes we need to make to SolrConfig.xml. I understood what changes need to
be made to schema.xml in a different thread on this forum.
Thanks,
Solr User
Ahmet,
Thanks for the reply and it was very helpful.
The query that I used before changing to dismax was:
/solr/tradecore/spell/?q=curious&wt=json&rows=9&facet=true&facet.limit=-1&facet.mincount=1&facet.field=author&facet.field=pubyear&facet.field=format&facet.field=series&facet.field=season&fac
facet data not returning and what mistake I did with the
schema?
Thanks,
Solr User
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:42 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
>
>
> Wow you facet on many fields :
>
> author,pubyear,format,series,season,imprint,category,award,age,reading,grade,price
>
> The fields y
Hi Ahmet,
The below is my previous configuration which use to work correctly.
textSpell
default
searchFields
/solr/qa/tradedata/spellchecker
true
We use to search only in one field which is "searchFields" but with
implementing dismax we are searching in different fields like
titl
like:
Did you mean: moon, mo, mooing, moonen, soon, mood, moose, moore,
spoon, moons?
and also the search results for the first suggestion moon.
Thanks,
Solr User
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> > The below is my previous configuration which use to work
> &g
.
What configuration changes I need to make so that special characters like
hypen (-), period (.) are ignored while indexing? or any other suggestions?
Thanks,
Solr User
Hi Eric,
I use solr version 1.4.0 and below is my schema.xml
It creates 3 tokens j r r tolkien works fine but not jrr tolkien.
I will read about PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory and try it. Please let me
know if I need to do anything differently.
Thanks,
Solr User
On Mon
1991"^2.0 | category:"pubyear 1991" | title:"pubyear 1991"^9.0 |
isbn10:"pubyear 1991" | season:"pubyear 1991" | imprint:"pubyear 1991" |
subtitle:"pubyear 1991"^3.0 | isbn13:"pubyear 1991") (series:2011 |
desc:2011 | bisacsub:2011 | award:2011 | format:2011 | shortdesc:2011 |
pubyear:2011 | author:2011^2.0 | category:2011 | title:2011^9.0 |
isbn10:2011 | season:2011 | imprint:2011 | subtitle:2011^3.0 |
isbn13:2011))~1) ()
DisMaxQParser
Basically we are trying to pass the query string along with a facet field
and the range. Is there any syntax issue? Please help this is urgent as I
got stuck.
Thanks,
Solr user
uot;not work"? What, exactly, fails to do what you
> expect?
>
> But the first question I have is "did you reindex after changing your
> schema?".
>
> And have you checked your index to verify that there values in the fields
> you
> changed?
>
> Be
was getting only 16 results
instead of 8000 results.
How to get all the search results using dismax? Do I need to configure
anything to make * (asterisk) work?
Thanks,
Solr User
that query syntax be *:* ?
>
> Regards,
> -- Savvas.
>
> On 6 December 2010 16:10, Solr User wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > First off thanks to the group for guiding me to move from default search
> > handler to dismax.
> >
> > I have a question related to getti
:
> On 12/13/2010 9:59 AM, Solr User wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I tried *:* using dismax and I get no results.
>>
>> Is there a way that I can get all the search results using dismax?
>>
>
> For dismax, use q= or simply leave the q parameter off the URL ent
sorry, never did find a solution to that.
if you do happen to figure it out, pls post a reply to this thread. thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/what-would-cause-large-numbers-of-executeWithRetry-INFO-messages-tp1453417p2281087.html
Sent from the Solr
not using Solr J.
Thanks,
Solr User
terms component with dismax? or Do I need to
call terms component directly to get auto suggestions?
Thank you so much in advance.
Regards,
Solr User
Hi All,
Please help me in implementing TermsComponent in my current Solr solution.
Regards,
Solr User
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Solr User wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using Solr 1.4.0 and dismax as request handler.I have the following in
> my solrconfig.xml in the dismax req
ntext:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-s-re-lucene-spatial-toolkit-aka-LSP-aka-spatial4j-tp3997757.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
cene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-s-re-lucene-spatial-toolkit-aka-LSP-aka-spatial4j-tp3997757p4000268.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
sage in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/question-s-re-lucene-spatial-toolkit-aka-LSP-aka-spatial4j-tp3997757p4000286.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
4057232 45.18986823069059, -93.26592485308495 45.18931973506328))'
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Intersects-spatial-query-returns-polygons-it-shouldn-t-tp4008646.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:
http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p26600956.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ique to do this?
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p26611715.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ckets. Filter queries are very fast in Solr 1.4 and this would limit
> your range query execution to documents which match the buckets.
>
Thank you for this suggestion. I will look into this.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p2663615
otential issues I found such as getting
product facets instead of customer facets, or having very large numbers of
ANDs and ORs, and so forth.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/question-about-schemas-tp26600956p26679922.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
