Jan,

Thanks for the response,

I though of using it, but it will be suboptimal to do this in the scenario
I have. I guess I have to explain the scenario better, let me try it again:-

1. I have importance based buckets in the system, this is implemented using
a variable named bucket_count having integer values 0,1,2,3, and I have to
show results in order of bucket_count i.e. results from 0th bucket at top,
then results from 1st bucket and so on. That is done by doing a asc sort on
this variable.
2. Now *within these buckets* I need to ensure that 1st listing of every
advertiser comes at top, then 2nd listing from every advertiser and so on.

Now if I go with the grouping on advertiserId and and use the group.offset,
then probably I also need to do additive filtering on bucket_count. To
explain it better pseudo algorithm will be like

1. query solr with group.offset 0 and bucket count 0
2. if results more than zero in step1 then increase group offset and follow
step 1 again
3. else increase bucket count with group offset zero and start from step 1.

With this logic in the worst case I need to query solr (number of
importance buckets)*(max number of listings by an advertiser). Which could
be very high number of solr queries for a single user query. Please suggest
if I can do this with more optimal way. I am also open to do modifications
in solr/lucene code if needed.

Regards,
BC Rathore


On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 4:09 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> How about trying grouping with paging?
> First you do
> group=true&group.field=advertiserId&group.limit=1&group.offset=0&group.main=true&sort=something&group.sort=how-much-paid
> desc
>
> That gives you one listing per advertiser, sorted the way you like.
> Then to grab the next batch of ads, you go group.offset=1 etc etc.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> On 26. apr. 2012, at 08:10, solr user wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are planning to move the search of one of our listing based portal to
> > solr/lucene search server from sphinx search server. But we are facing a
> > challenge is porting customized sorting being used in our portal. We only
> > have last 60 days of data live.The algorithm is as follows:-
> >
> >   1.  Put all listings into 54 buckets – (Date bucket for 60 days)  i.e.
> >   buckets of 7day, 1 day, 1 day……
> >   2.  For each date bucket we make 2 buckets –(Paid / free bucket)
> >   3.  For each paid / free bucket cycle the advertisers on uniqueness
> basis
> >
> >                  i.e. inside a bucket the ordering should be 1st listing
> > of each advertiser, 2nd listing of each advertiser and so on
> >                  in other words within a *sub-bucket* second listing of
> an
> > advertiser will be displayed only after first listing of all advertiser
> has
> > been displayed.
> >
> > For taking care of point 1 and 2 we have created a field named
> bucket_index
> > at the time of indexing the data and get the results sorted by this
> index,
> > but we are not able to find a way to create a sort field at index time or
> > think of a sort function for the point no 3.  Please suggest if there is
> a
> > way to do so in solr.
> >
> > Tia,
> >
> > BC Rathore
>
>

Reply via email to