ud index?
It would be great to have a "standalone DIH" that runs as a separate server
and then sends standard Solr update requests to a Solr cluster.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lee Chunki
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 8:55 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
could use.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Heisey
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 11:42 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: external indexer for Solr Cloud
On 9/1/2014 7:19 AM, Jack Krupansky wrote:
It would be great to have a "standalone DIH&
en you can simply
query:
php_skill:[5 TO *] AND ruby_skill:[2 TO *]
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: amid
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 12:24 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Indexing & search list of Key/Value pairs
Hi,
I'm using solr and trying to
evelopment:[10 TO *]
That would match somebody with "Agile Methodology" or "Agile Development"
AND 10 or more years of "Software Development".
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: amid
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2014 12:50 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apa
e sure to
keep your listing up to date, including regional availability and any
specialties.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: elisabeth benoit
Sent: Wednesday, September 3, 2014 4:02 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: looking for a solr/search expert in Paris
Hello,
he highest
relevance.
The similarity vector is created during item processing and indicates the most
important terms or concepts in the item and the corresponding weight.”
See:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff521597(v=office.14).aspx
-- Jack Krupansky
From: "Jürgen Wagn
the same source text in multiple fields, one for each
language. You can then do a dismax query on that set of fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ilia Sretenskii
Sent: Friday, September 5, 2014 10:06 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to implement
Sounds like a great future to add to Solr, especially if it would facilitate
more automatic relevancy enhancement. LucidWorks Search has a feature called
"unsupervised feedback" that does that but something like a docvector might
make it a more realistic default.
-- Jack
Payload really don't have first class support in Solr. It's a solid feature
of Lucene, but never expressed well in Solr. Any thoughts or proposals are
welcome!
(Hmmm... I wonder what the good folks at Heliosearch have up their sleeves
in this area?!)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origin
Out of curiosity, what would be an example query for your application that
would depend on sentence tokenization, as opposed to simple term
tokenization? I mean, there are no sentence-based query operators in the
Solr query parsers.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Sandeep
re very sensitive to
short queries. Keep in mind that auto-detection for indexing full documents
is a different problem that auto-detection for very short queries.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ilia Sretenskii
Sent: Sunday, September 7, 2014 10:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucen
It is mostly a matter of how you expect to query that data - do you need
different queries for different sources, or do you have a common conceptual
model that covers all sources with a common set of queries?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vineet yadav
Sent: Tuesday
ng the term "exact match" ONLY for string field
queries, and that don't use wildcard, fuzzy, or range queries. And maybe
also keyword tokenizer text fields that don't have any filters, which might
as well be string fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From:
You can use an update request processor to filter the input for large
values. You could write a script with the stateless script processor which
ignores or trims large input values.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Gross
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 7:58 AM
full wiki
page as a string field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 8:39 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: Solr Exceptions -- "immense terms"
May not need a script for that:
http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lu
>Waiting for a positive response!
-1
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Rakesh Varna
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 10:18 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Mongo DB Users
Remove
Regards,
Rakesh Varna
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Ed Smiley wr
Do a to a numeric field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: How to summarize a String Field ?
You cannot do this as far as I know, it must be a numeric field
(float
You simply download it yourself and give yourself a demo!!
http://lucidworks.com/product/fusion/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Egense
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 2:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ANN] Lucidworks Fusion 1.0.0
Hi Grant
Or simply enclosed the full term in quotes:
q=path:"my path"
Which is more properly encoded as:
q=path:%22my+path%22
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: query
You set the defaults on the "search handler", not the "search component".
See solrconfig.xml:
explicit
10
text
...
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11
The wildcard query is “constant score” to make it faster, so unfortunately that
means there is no score differentiation between the wildcard matches.
You can simple add the wildcard prefix as a separate query term and boost it:
q=text:carre* text:carre^1.5
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Pigeyre
I am not aware of any such feature! That doesn't mean it doesn't exist, but
I don't recall seeing it in the Solr source code.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 1:31 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apa
And how is the schema field declared. Seems like it's a TrieDoubleField,
which should be a simple floating point value. You should be using the
spatial field types.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 12:20 PM
To: solr
And you can also check out the tutorials in any of the Solr books, including
my Solr Deep Dive e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Mikhail Khludnev
Sent
pf and ps merely control boosting of documents, not selection of documents.
mm controls selection of documents.
So, hopefully at least doc3 is returned before doc2.
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 5:39 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: multiple
That's called phrase query - selecting documents based on the order of the
terms. Just enclose the terms in quotes.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 2:41 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: multiple terms ord
You can perform boolean operations using parentheses. So you can OR a
sequence of sub-queries, and each sub-query can be an AND of the desired
search term and the constraining values for other fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Shamik Bandopadhyay
Sent: Monday
The special characters (colon) are treated as term delimiters for text
field. How do you really intend to query this "string". You could make it
simply a "string" field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: J'roo
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 20
nts that contain all three of
the terms rather than any of the three terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: shamik
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 5:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Boost Query (bq) syntax/usage
Hi,
I'm little confused with the right
The "+" signs in the parsed boost query indicated the terms were ANDed
together, but maybe you can use the q.op and mm parameters to change the
default operator (I forget!).
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: shamik
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:19 PM
To:
dismax and then specify edismax for bq using the localParam notation.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:19 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Boost Query (bq) syntax/usage
The "+" signs in the parsed b
token gets analyzed into - that's what your wildcard prefix must
match. Sometimes (usually!) you will be surprised.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Wayne W
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 7:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Wildcard search makes no sense!
Unless you consider yourself to be a "Solr expert", it would be best to
implement such query translation in an application layer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: sagarprasad
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 3:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Adding
ata into Solr and then simply directly
search the data within Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Wednesday, October 1, 2014 9:35 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr + Federated Search Question
Hi,
Federation is possible. Solr has distribut
That's a reasonable description for Solr/Lucene scoring, but use the latest
release:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_10_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/TFIDFSimilarity.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: mdemarco123
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 6:06
Yes, either term can be used to confuse people equally well!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alejandro Calbazana
Sent: Thursday, October 2, 2014 3:28 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: Re: Solr + Federated Search Question
Thanks Ahmet. Yay! New
What exactly do you think that filter query is doing? Explain it in plain
English.
My guess is that it eliminates all your document matches.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: PeterKerk
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
max can be used to apply a boost
to all un-fielded terms for a field, you otherwise need to apply any boost
on a term, not a field.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: PeterKerk
Sent: Saturday, October 4, 2014 10:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Flexible search
have separate clusters
for larger groups of customers, maybe with a smaller cluster with a
collection that maps the customer ID to a Solr cluster, and then the
application layer can direct requests to the Solr cluster that owns that
customer.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
ot; term, so it
requried the string term to match, which won't happen since only the full
string is indexed.
Generally, you need to escape all special characters in a query. Then
hopefully your string field will match.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Hubold
Sen
tch on the string field, but a
tokenized phrase match on the text field, and support partial matches on the
text field as a phrase of contiguous terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Hubold
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 12:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
S
aking white space as white
space here.
And update the Lucene Javadoc contract to be more explicit.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 10:16 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; solr-user
Subject: RE: WhitespaceTokenizer to con
again, so the hyphen gets
quoted, and then analyzed to nothing for text fields but is still a string
for string fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Lanke,Aniruddha
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: eDisMax parser an
Definitely sounds like a bug! File a Jira. Thanks for reporting this. What
release of Solr?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Pawel Rog
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 3:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Edismax parser and boosts
Hi,
I use edismax query with
The LucidWorks product has builtin crawler support so you could crawl one or
more web sites.
http://lucidworks.com/product/fusion/
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Vishal Sharma
Sent: Tuesday, October 7, 2014 2:08 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Best way to
The similarity class is only invoked at query time, so it doesn't
participate in indexing.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 6:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: does one need to reindex when changing simil
Sounds reasonable. File a Jira!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jamie Johnson
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 11:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: DateMathParser question
I have found that DateMathParser is extremely useful in providing nice
labels back to
detail.
See:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Sunday, October 12, 2014 7:40 PM
To: solr-user
Subject: What happens if you don't
epend on the analyzer to "tokenize" the quoted
string into individual terms, which the numeric field types would not do.
I'm too lazy to check to see what Lucene classes call the
getPositionIncrementGap method and what they do with its return value.
-- Jack Krupansky
-
Simply escape it with a backslash or enclose the term in quotes.
Sure, it would be nice to be able to configure various operators to be
disabled, but that's not fesible with query parser designed around static
grammars and infleexible tools such as JFlex.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Ori
different.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Markus Jelsma
Sent: Monday, October 13, 2014 5:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: does one need to reindex when changing similarity class
Yes, if the replacing similarity has a different implementation on norms,
It would be nice to have a logging option to log updates vs. inserts, to
help make it more obvious what is happening. And maybe even a way for a Solr
update request to get back a summary of how many documents were inserted,
updated, and deleted.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message
in their new
Fusion product is unclear - I couldn't find any reference in the doc.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Lewis
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 1:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How should one search on all fields? *:XX does not work
Hi,
As always, you need to first examine how you intend to query the fields before
you dive into data modeling. In this case, is there any particular reason that
you need the individual terms as separate values, as opposed to simply using a
tokenized text field?
-- Jack Krupansky
From: Tomer Levi
No, but it is a reasonable request, as a global default, a
collection-specific default, a request-specific default, and on an
individual fuzzy term.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: elisabeth benoit
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 6:07 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
ng parallel systems with an atomic
swap/redirection is probably simplest, while for larger clusters an
incremental rolling update with thorough testing on a pre-production test
cluster is the way to go.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Faisal Mansoor
Sent: Saturday, November 1
urther, the "crash" would more likely have occurred on your "dev" cluster
first, well before even making it to your pre-production test system.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Will Martin
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 6:37 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apac
Yeah, that behavior is consistent with what I documented in my e-book for
Solr. The dot is kept only if between two digits or two letters.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Jorge Luis BetancourtGonzález
Sent: Sunday, November 2, 2014 4:34 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Updating+Parts+of+Documents
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Tomer Levi
Sent: Monday, November 3, 2014 4:19 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: RE: Ignoring Duplicates in Multivalue Field
Hi Ahmet,
When I add the RunU
Think of Solr/SolrCloud itself as a SAN - smart networked machines that
intensely manage local storage. Have two levels of "SAN" is
counterproductive.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Gili Nachum
Sent: Tuesday, November 4, 2014 4:57 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.
ipt update processor.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Kirsch
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 6:12 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Best way to map holidays to corresponding date
Hey,
maybe someone already faced the situation and could give me a hi
Document x doesn't exist - in terms of visibility - until the commit, so the
delete will no-op since a query of Lucene will not "see" the uncommitted new
document.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Matteo Grolla
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:47 A
.
(Disclosure: I am a contractor for DataStax. I'm their "Domain Expert for
Search/Solr".)
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: andrey prokopenko
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 8:52 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: on regards to Solr and NoSQL storages integra
Could you clarify exactly what you are trying to do, like with an example? I
mean, how exactly are you determining what fields are "unwanted"? Are you
simply asking whether fields can be deleted from the index (and schema)?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: yriv
Agreed, but I think it would be great if Lucene and Solr provided an API to
delete a single field for the entire index. We could file a Jira, but can
Lucene accommodate it? Maybe we'll just have to wait for Elasticsearch to
implement this feature!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Me
Are you using the synonyms for both indexing and query? It sounds like you
want to use these synonyms only at query time. Otherwise, "10" in the index
becomes "2010" in the index.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automoti
es can occur at full speed, with indexing in a background
thread, maximizing ingestion performance.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: andrey prokopenko
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2014 5:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: on regards to Solr and NoSQL storages int
Try writing a few examples. Try christmas, easter, and memorial day.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Anurag Sharma
Sent: Sunday, November 9, 2014 12:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Best way to map holidays to corresponding date
Not sure this is the
Please post some examples of titles and queries that you expect should
match. How "partial" can the title be? How "full" does it need to be? When
there are multiple partial matches how are you expecting them to be ranked?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From:
You could implement a custom highlighter for that field. Otherwise, you are
requesting a feature that does not exist in Solr today. The fl parameter
specifies fields to return, not portions of fields.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: kumar
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014
static field rather than dynamic field, although the
latter should work anyway.
Please file a Jira to request that Solr give a user-sensible error, not a
Lucene-level error. I mean, the Solr user has no ability to directly invoke
the "createFields" method.
And now... let&#
egments or rewriting
them.
The constant score should normally be 1.0. If it is not, maybe you have
query boost terms, and they are using the df of the boost terms.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 4:50 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.o
Your query has a space in it after the colon, which is not valid. Could you
post the actual, full query request, as well as the full query response?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Thomas L. Redman
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2014 2:45 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
of adopting for Solr.
I mean, are we trying too reinvent the wheel here, or what?!
Note: This is the Solr USER list, which isn't the best forum for development
discussions.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 10
In particular, if they are image-intensive, all the images go away. And the
formatting as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Ahmet Arslan
Sent: Monday, December 1, 2014 6:02 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Large fields storage
Hi Avi,
I assume your
to providing us with more specific requirements. My guess, from your
mention of LDAP, is that the field would contain only a name, but... that's
me guessing when you need to be specific. Once this distinction is cleared
up, we can then focus on solutions that work either for arbitrary text or
combined with the NGramFilterFactory and lower
case filter, but only use the ngram filter at index time.
See:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_10_2/analyzers-common/org/apache/lucene/analysis/ngram/NGramFilterFactory.html
But be aware that use of the ngram filter dramatically increases the index
If possible, please post your field type for others to see the final
solution. Thanks!
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dinesh Babu
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 9:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; Ahmet Arslan
Subject: RE: How to stop Solr tokenising search
boost as do less-precise phrases.
But it does need to be optional since it has an added cost at query time.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Sokolov
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2014 8:43 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: different fields for user-supplied
My Solr Deep Dive e-book has full details and lots of examples for CSV
indexing:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Alexandre Rafalovitch
Sent: Tuesday, December
thing, but the real problem
is further upstream and hasn't been fully expressed. My model is to give you
a lot of examples and you can decide for yourself which best exemplifies
what you are trying to do. And to give more detail on the features of Solr.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Origina
ther it is Tomcat or Solr that gives the error, the main point is that
the raw circumflex shouldn't be sent to either.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Dec 24, 2014 at 4:32 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> OK, then I don't think it's a Solr problem. I think 5 of your Tomcats are
> con
/solr/Exporting+Result+Sets
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 3:58 AM, Sandy Ding wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I've recently set up a solr cluster and found that "export" returns
> different results from "select".
> And I confirmed that the "expor
are no longer I/O bound. If compute bound,
shard more heavily until the query latency becomes acceptable.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 1:02 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Thanks for your suggestions Erick.
>
> This may be one of those situations where you really have to
&g
You can also use group.query or group.func to group documents matching a
query or unique values of a function query. For the latter you could
implement an NLP algorithm.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Meraj A. Khan wrote:
> Thanks Aman, the thing is the bookName fi
.
-- Jack Krupansky
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> When you say 2B docs on a single Solr instance, are you talking only one
> shard?
> Because if you are, you're very close to the absolute upper limit of a
> shard, internally
> the doc
term and the multi-term phrase, while the query analyzer would NOT
do the split on case, so that the query could be a unitary term (possibly
with mixed case, but that would not split the term) or could be a two-word
phrase.
-- Jack Krupansky
-- Jack Krupansky
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 5:12 PM
e absolute precision. Sometimes
you just want to know whether "something" exists matching the pattern, or
"generally" what the values look like.
I think it would be worth a Jira.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 6:16 AM, Modassar Ather
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
a proof of
concept implementation to validate whether the sweet spot for your
particular data, data model, and application access patterns may be well
above or even below that.
Yes, indeed, sing praises for heroes, but don't kill yourself and drag down
others trying to be one yourself.
--
Right, that's what I meant by WDF not being "magic" - you can configure it
to match any three out of four use cases as you choose, but there is no
choice that matches all of the use cases.
To be clear, this is not a "bug" in WDF, but simply a limitation.
-- Jack Krupan
I do have a more thorough discussion of WDF in my Solr Deep Dive e-book:
http://www.lulu.com/us/en/shop/jack-krupansky/solr-4x-deep-dive-early-access-release-7/ebook/product-21203548.html
You're not "wrong" about anything here... you just need to accept that WDF
is not magic a
You would have to do your own build since the patch has not been committed.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Rajesh wrote:
> Mikhail,
>
> How can I get a nightly build with fix for SOLR-5147 included. I've
> searched and found that nightly build will not be
R-839
-- Jack Krupansky
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 4:08 AM, Leonid Bolshinsky
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Are we always limited by the query parser syntax when passing a query
> string to Solr?
> What about the query elements which are not supported by the syntax?
> For example, BooleanQuery.setM
First, see if you can get your requirements to align to the de-dupe feature
that Solr already has:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/De-Duplication
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Amit Jha wrote:
> I am trying to find out duplicate records based on dista
ere.
So the race is on between when Lucene will relax the 2G limit and when
hardware gets fast enough that 2G documents can be indexed within a small
number of hours.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Toke Eskildsen
wrote:
> Erick Erickson [erickerick...@gmail.com] wrote:
&
t I agree that it would be highly desirable to push that 100 million
number up to 350 million or even 500 million ASAP since the pain of
unnecessarily sharding is unnecessarily excessive.
I wonder what changes will have to occur in Lucene, or... what evolution in
commodity hardware will be necessary t
You need to escape the space in your query (using backslash or quotes
around the term) - the query parser doesn't parse based on the
analyzer/tokenizer for each field.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Sankalp Gupta
wrote:
> Hi
> I come across this weird behaviour i
queries are expressed and the results being returned.
-- Jack Krupansky
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:39 AM, klunwebale wrote:
> hello
>
> i want to create a vertical search engine like trovit.com.
>
> I have installed solr and solarium.
>
> What else to i need can you recomme
cores/tenants.
Will tenants be directly accessing Solr, or will you provide them with a
REST API for an application layer that intermediates access to Solr?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Bram Van Dam wrote:
> One possibility is to have separate core for each tenant domain.
&
number of CPU cores?
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Nishanth S wrote:
> Thanks Shawn and Walter.Yes those are 12,000 writes/second.Reads for the
> moment would be in the 1000 reads/second. Guess finding out the right
> number of shards would be my starting point.
&
801 - 900 of 2693 matches
Mail list logo
