I'll post a comment on the relevant Jira as well, but it would be helpful if
people could provide a reference to some existing "server" products that
they are attempting to model Solr 5.0 after - or provide a rationale as to
why no existing server products provide a model worthy of adopting for Solr.
I mean, are we trying too reinvent the wheel here, or what?!
Note: This is the Solr USER list, which isn't the best forum for development
discussions.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Hatcher
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2014 10:25 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Disappearance of post.jar from the new tutorial
Indeed! It’s always been a goal/dream of mine to have the
tutorial/quickstart be more “integrated” like that.
I’ve got some ideas/techniques in the works to make this smooth and clean.
Coming soon (mid/late December as my plate empties for Xmas time), but by
all means feel free to start posting JIRAs/patches on where you’d like it to
go and we’ll sync up. Thanks, Alexandre!
Erik
On Nov 29, 2014, at 8:25 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Could be nice to have the tutorial then as a runnable Solr core. With
tutorial text, perhaps, showing up as an admin-extra or some such.
Would that be of interest?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 29 November 2014 at 19:53, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com> wrote:
You can still do the same thing with the solr-core JAR (note the
CLASSPATH in the tutorial).
I didn't want the new tutorial to rely on example/exampledocs directory,
and to be able to run from the root directory.
The embedded tutorial does need to be removed, or cloned. Removing it
seems best to avoid duplication. But it's also nice to have it built in
and versioned. Suggestions and patches welcome.
Erik
On Nov 29, 2014, at 19:27, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
But before you could take that jar to another machine or whatever.
Plus, it run on Windows (I am reading SOLR-6435). Maybe it's opposite
and this single class does not need to be in the solr-core's jar? Or
the price of duplication is not that big. At least until we build a
full-blown client.
And - like I mentioned in the SOLR-6077 (found it after the email),
how does this impact the tutorial we ship with Solr. Or, are we
deleting that as well?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
On 29 November 2014 at 19:15, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I removed reference to it as the same class is in solr-core's JAR.
The idea is to hide the details behind bin/post and before end of year
(before 5.0 release at least) to get that taken care of.
Maybe post.jar can go away completely, but with bin/post the internal
details won't matter.
Erik
On Nov 29, 2014, at 17:07, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
Anybody knows why the new online tutorial no longer mentions post.jar
: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/quickstart.html
Instead the command line offered is:
java -Dauto -Drecursive org.apache.solr.util.SimplePostTool docs/
The post.jar is still there in both 4.10.2 and - so far - in 5.
Color me very confused.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and
@solrstart
Solr popularizers community:
https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
