Try this:
http://hokiesuns.blogspot.com/2010/01/setting-up-apache-solr-in-eclipse.html
I use this today and it still works. If anything is outdated (as it's a
relatively old post) let me know.
I wrote this so ping me if you have any questions.
Thanks
Amit
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Amit A
Hi all,
I have been using Solr for years but never really stopped to wonder:
When using the dismax/edismax handler, when do you have the qf different
from the pf?
I have always set them to be the same (maybe different weights) but I was
wondering if there is a situation where you would have a fi
"when phrases aren't important in the fields".
> If you're doing a simple boolean match, adding phrase fields will add
> expense, to no good purpose etc. Phrases on numeric
> fields seems wrong.
>
> FWIW,
> Erick
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Amit
Hi all,
I have a question around boosting. I wanted to use the &boost= to write a
nested query that will boost a document based on categorical preferences.
For a movie search for example, say that a user likes drama, comedy, and
action. I could use things like
qq=&q={!boost%20b=$b%20defType=edis
Hey Chris,
Sorry for the delay and thanks for your response. This was inspired by your
talk on boosting and biasing that you presented way back when at a meetup.
I'm glad that my general approach seems to make sense.
My approach was something like:
1) Look at the categories that the user has pref
I thought about that but my concern/question was how. If I used the pow
function then I'm still boosting the bad categories by a small
amount..alternatively I could multiply by a negative number but does that
work as expected?
I haven't done much with negative boosting except for the sledgehammer
Hi Chris (and others interested in this),
Sorry for dropping off.. I got sidetracked with other work and came back to
this and finally got a V1 of this implemented.
The final process is as follows:
1) Pre-compute the global categorical num_ratings/average/std-dev (so for
Action the average rating
Chris,
Sounds good! Thanks for the tips.. I'll be glad to submit my talk to this
as I have a writeup pretty much ready to go.
Cheers
Amit
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : The initial results seem to be kinda promising... of course there are
> many
> : more optimiz
"We need to also track the size of the response (as the size in bytes of the
whole xml response tat is streamed, with stored fields and all). I was a
bit worried cause I am wondering if a searchcomponent will actually have
access to the response bytes..."
==> Can't you get this from your container
There's a whole heap of information that is missing like what you plan on
storing vs indexing and yes QPS too. My short answer is try with one server
until it falls over then start adding more.
When you say multiple-server setup do you mean multiple servers where each
server acts as a slave storin
I don't understand why this would be more performant.. seems like it'd be
more memory and resource intensive as you'd have multiple class-loaders and
multiple cache spaces for no good reason. Just have a single core with
sufficiently large caches to handle your response needs.
If you want to load
If you generate the maven pom files you can do this I think by doing mvn
-DskipTests=true.
On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 7:25 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Don't know a good way to skip compiling the tests, but there isn't
> any harm in compiling them...
>
> changing to the solr directory and just issui
At first I thought you were referring to Filters in Lucene at query time
(i.e. bitset filters) but I think you are referring to token filters at
indexing/text analysis time?
I have had success writing my own Filter as the link presents. The key is
that you should write a custom class that extends
Is it possible instead to store in your solr index a bounding box of store
location + delivery radius, do a bounding box intersection between your
user's point + radius (as a bounding box) and the shop's delivery bounding
box. If you want further precision, the frange may work assuming it's a
post-
Hossman did a presentation on something similar to this using spatial data
at a Solr meetup some months ago.
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/spatial-for-non-spatial-meetup-20130117/
May be helpful to you.
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 9:40 AM, rajh wrote:
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> Do you m
All,
I am not sure if this is overly obvious or not (it wasn't to me) but in
trying to index some international characters from XML files using the DIH,
I found that setting the encoding attribute on the dataSource element to
"UTF-8" fixed my problem.
My question is why the default isn't UTF-8
That's probably the most efficient way to do it... I believe the line you
are referring allows you to have sub-entities which , in the RDBMS, would
execute a separate query for each parent given a primary key. The downside
to this though is that for each parent you will be executing N separate
quer
just create an account (I think the
> link to
> that is in the page footer) and edit.
>
> Otis
>
> Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch
> Lucene ecosystem search :: http://search-lucene.com/
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message
> > F
I am not sure if this is the best approach to this problem but I was curious
if a single solr server could be both a master and a slave without causing
index corruption? It seems that you could setup multiple replication
handlers in the SOLR config, /replication /replication2 and have one be
master
Ugh I should have checked there first! Thanks for the reply.. that helps a
lot.
Sincerely
Amit
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Gora Mohanty wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:43:38 -0700
> Amit Nithian wrote:
>
> > I am not sure if this is the best approach to this proble
i recommend JMeter. We use that to do load testing on a search server. of
course you have to provide a reasonable set of queries as input... if you
don't have any then a reasonable estimation based on your expected traffic
should suffice. JMeter can be used for other load testing too..
Be careful
Hi all,
I am curious to know get some opinions on at what point having more CPU
cores shows diminishing returns in terms of QPS. Our index size is about 8GB
and we have 16GB of RAM on a quad core 4 x 2.4 GHz AMD Opteron 2216.
Currently I have the heap to 8GB.
We are looking to get more servers to
index in memory- better than Solr can.
>
> Lance
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am curious to know get some opinions on at what point having more CPU
> > cores shows diminishing returns in terms of QPS. Our index size
d allocate enough
>> RAM to run comfortably. Linux & Windows et. al. have their own cache
>> of disk blocks. They use very good algorithms for managing this cache.
>> Also, they do not make long garbage collection passes.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Amit Nit
I am curious about this too.. are you talking about using HBase/Cassandra as
an aux store of large data or using Cassandra to store the actual lucene
index (as in LuCandra)?
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Siju George wrote:
> Thanks a million Nick,
>
> We are currently debating whether we sho
I am trying to understand the multicore setup of Solr more and saw
that SolrCore.getCore is deprecated in favor of
CoreContainer.getCore(name). How can I get a reference to the
CoreContainer for I assume it's been created somewhere in Solr and is
it possible for one core to get access to another So
Try stopping replication and see if your query performance may
improve. I think the caches get reset each time replication occurs.
You can look at the cache performance using the admin console.. try
and see if any of the caches are constantly being missed.. this could
be due to your newSearcher/fir
Few questions about the CollapseComponent:
1) From what I can tell in either SOLR-236, SOLR-1682, this component
extends the QueryComponent which allows one to dedup when doing a
normal search. Is there a concern about performance in the worst case
that you have a bunch of docs with the same value
ving it re-parse the configuration files).
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!
Amit
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> I am trying to understand the multicore setup of Solr more and saw
> that SolrCore.getCore is deprecated in favor of
> CoreContainer.getCore(nam
I implemented the edge ngrams solution and it's an awesome one
compared to any other that I could think of because I can index more
than just text (other metadata) that can be used to *rank* the
autocomplete results eventually getting to rank by the probability of
selection which is, after all, wha
If you're going to validate the rows parameter, may as well validate the
start parameter too.. I've run into problems with start and rows with
ridiculously high values crash our servers.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 9:58 AM, solr-user wrote:
> Thanks guys. This is a problem with the front end not v
You can simplify your code by searching across cores in the SearchComponent:
1) public class YourComponent implements SolrCoreAware
--> Grab instance of CoreContainer and store (mCoreContainer =
core.getCoreDescriptor().getCoreContainer();)
2) In the process method:
* grab the core requested (SolrC
Why not create a new field that just contains the day component? Then you
can group by this field.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 12:38 PM, sdanzig wrote:
> I'm trying to create a SOLR query that groups/field collapses by date. I
> have a field in -MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss'Z' format, "datetime", and I'm
ue&group.func=**rint(div(ms(date_dt),mul(24,**
> mul(60,mul(60,1000)
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: Amit Nithian
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 10:29 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Grouping by a date field
>
Hi all,
I recently discovered the group.main=true/false parameter which really has
made life simple in terms of ensuring that the format coming out of Solr
for my clients (RoR app) is backwards compatible with the non-grouped
results which ensures no special "handle grouped results" logic.
The on
A new response attribute would be better but it also complicates the patch
in that it would require a new way to serialize DocSlices I think
(especially when group.main=true)? I was looking to set group.main=true so
that my existing clients don't have to change to parse the grouped
resultset format
ough to
simply say a full copy is needed if the slave's index version is >=
master's index version. I'll create a patch and file a bug along with a
more thorough writeup of how I got in this state.
Thanks!
Amit
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> Does Solr&#
Okay one last note... just for closure... looks like it was addressed in
solr 4.1+ (I was looking at 4.0).
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> Okay so after some debugging I found the problem. While the replication
> piece will download the index from the master serv
Have you looked at the "pf" parameter for dismax handlers? pf does I think
what you are looking for which is to boost documents with the query term
exactly matching in the various fields with some phrase slop.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 2:59 AM, Hemant Verma wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I have a use case wi
Ultimately this is dependent on what your metrics for success are. For some
places it may be just raw CTR (did my click through rate increase) but for
other places it may be a function of money (either it may be gross revenue,
profits, # items sold etc). I don't know if there is a generic answer fo
So just a hunch... but when the slave downloads the data from the master,
doesn't it do a commit to force solr to recognize the changes? In so doing,
wouldn't that increase the generation number? In theory it shouldn't matter
because the replication looks for files that are different to determine
w
Okay so then that should explain the generation difference of 1 between the
master and slave
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2013, at 1:17 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
>
> > doesn't it do a commit to force solr to recognize the changes?
>
> yes.
>
> - Mark
>
Ah yes sorry mis-understood. Another option is to use n-grams so that
"projectmanager" is a term so any query involving "project manager in india
with 2 years experience" would match higher because the query would contain
"projectmanager" as a term.
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Hemant Verma w
Okay so I think I found a solution if you are a maven user and don't
mind forcing the test codec to Lucene40 then do the following:
Add this to your pom.xml under the
"
" section
org.apache.maven.plugins
maven-surefire-plugin
2.13
-Dtests.codec=Lucene40
I
additional commit
> - if the master is 2 or more generations ahead then do _no_ commit
> OR
> - if the master is 2 or more generations ahead then do a commit but don't
> change generation and version of index
>
> Can this be true?
>
> I would say "not really&q
be added to
the next release of Solr as this is a fairly significant bug to me.
Cheers
Amit
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> So the diff in generation numbers are due to the commits I believe that
> Solr does when it has the new index files but the fact that it's
Thanks for the links... I have updated SOLR-4471 with a proposed solution
that I hope can be incorporated or amended so we can get a clean fix into
the next version so our operations and network staff will be happier with
not having gigs of data flying around the network :-)
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013
Sounds good I am trying the combination of my patch and 4413 now to see how
it works and will have to see if I can put unit tests around them as some
of what I thought may not be true with respect to the commit generation
numbers.
For your issue above in your last post, is it possible that there w
Yeah I had a similar problem. I filed and submitted this patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4310
Let me know if this is what you are looking for!
Amit
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Teun Duynstee wrote:
> Ah, I see. The docs say "Although this result format does not have as mu
This is cool! I had done something similar except changing via JConsole/JMX:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2306
We had something not as nice at Zvents but I wanted to expose these as
MBean properties so you could change them via any JMX UI like JVisualVM
Cheers!
Amit
On Mon, Feb 25
I need to write some tests which I hope to do tonight and then I think
it'll get into 4.2
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Nicholas Ding wrote:
> Thanks Amit, that's cool! So it will also be fixed on Solr 4.2, right?
>
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
I don't know a ton about SolrCloud but for our setup and my limited
understanding of it is that you start to bleed operational and
non-operational aspects together which I am not comfortable doing (i.e.
software load balancing). Also adding ZooKeeper to the mix is yet another
thing to install, setu
ng monitoring or High
> Availability/Disaster Recovery tools, then you might find the cost/benefit
> analysis changing.
>
> Personally, I think it's ironic that the memory improvements that came
> along _with_ SolrCloud make it less necessary to shard. Which means that
> traditi
without Solr Cloud, but
> there would be no redundancy.
>
> Michael Della Bitta
>
>
> Appinions
> 18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor
> New York, NY 10017-6271
>
> www.appinions.com
>
> Where Influence Isn’t a Game
>
>
We too run a ping every 5 seconds and I think the concurrent Mark/Sweep
helps to avoid the LB from taking a box out of rotation due to long pauses.
Either that or I don't see large enough pauses for my LB to take it out
(it'd have to fail 3 times in a row or 15 seconds total before it's gone).
The
Why wouldn't SolrCloud help you here? You can setup shards and replicas etc
to have redundancy b/c HDFS isn't designed to serve real time queries as
far as I understand. If you are using HDFS as a backup mechanism to me
you'd be better served having multiple slaves tethered to a master (in a
non-cl
ggested using the following
> command
>
> hadoop fs -copyFromLocal URI
>
> Ok let me try out solrcloud as I will need to make sure it works well with
> nutch too..
>
> Thanks for the help..
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:47 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
>
> > Why w
Hey all,
I don't know about you but most of the Solr URLs I issue are fairly
lengthy full of parameters on the query string and browser location
bars aren't long enough/have multi-line capabilities. I tried to find
something that does this but couldn't so I wrote a chrome extension to
help.
Pleas
;fl", "qf" or "bf".
> Would be nice if the edit box was multi-line, or perhaps adjusts to the
> size of the content
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.facebook.com/Cominvent
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
&
case I messed up github, complex
> params like the fq here:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=:&fq={!geofilt sfield=store
> pt=52.67,7.30 d=5}
>
> aren't properly handled.
>
> But I'm already using it occasionally
>
> Erick
>
> On Tue, May 1
uot;tab" to
edit the next row but it helps a bit in that problem.
Please keep submitting issues as you encounter them and I'll address
them as best as possible. I hope that this helps everyone!
Thanks!
Amit
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
> Erick
>
> Yes th
I had a similar problem so I submitted this patch:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2351
I haven't applied this to trunk in a while but my goal was to ensure
that bf parameters were passed down and respected by the MLT handler.
Let me know if this works for you or not. If there is suffic
So couple questions on this (comment first then question):
1) I guess you can't have four combinations b/c
index=false/stored=false has no meaning?
2) If you set less fields stored=true does this reduce the memory
footprint for the document cache? Or better yet, I can store more
documents in the ca
Couple questions:
1) Why are you explicitly telling solr to sort by score desc,
shouldn't it do that for you? Could this be a source of performance
problems since sorting requires the loading of the field caches?
2) Of the query parameters, q1 and q2, which one is actually doing
"text" searching on
Hello all,
I am curious to know how people are using Solr in conjunction with
other data stores when building search engines to power web sites (say
an ecommerce site). The question I have for the group is given an
architecture where the primary (transactional) data store is MySQL
(Oracle, PostGre
No worries! What version of Solr are you using? One that you
downloaded as a tarball or one that you checked out from SVN (trunk)?
I'll take a bit of time and document steps and respond.
I'll review the patch to see that it fits a general case. Question for
you with MLT, are your users doing a bla
m the xwiki objects which pull from the
> SQL database). However, it implied that we had to rewrite anything necessary
> for the rendering, hence the rendering has not re-used that many code.
>
> Paul
>
>
> Le 4 juil. 2012 à 09:54, Amit Nithian a écrit :
>
>> Hello al
Sorry I'm a bit new to the nrt stuff in solr but I'm trying to understand
the implications of frequent commits and cache rebuilding and auto warming.
What are the best practices surrounding nrt searching and caches and query
performance.
Thanks!
Amit
Thanks for the responses. I guess my specific question is if I had
something which was dependent on the mapping between lucene document ids
and some object primary key so i could pull in external data from another
data source without a constant reindex, how would this get affected by soft
and hard
I am debugging an out of memory error myself and a few suggestions:
1) Are you looking at your search logs around the time of the memory
error? In my case, I found a few bad queries requesting a ton of rows
(basically the whole index's worth which I think is an error somewhere
in our app just have
I think your thought about using the edge ngram as a field and
boosting that field in the qf/pf sections of the dismax handler sounds
reasonable. Why do you have qualms about it?
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Kiran Jayakumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to score documents with a match "earl
Sorry i'm really late to this so not sure if this is even an issue:
1) I found that there is an ant eclipse that makes it easy to setup
the eclipse .project and .classpath (I think I had done this by hand
in the tutorial)
2) Yes you can attach to a remote instance of Solr but your JVM has to
have t
Way back when I opened an issue about using XML entity includes in
Solr as a way to break up the config. I have found problems with
XInclude having multiple elements to include because the file is not
well formed. From what I have read, if you make this well formed, you
end up with a document that'
If I understand you right, replication of data has 0 downtime, it
just works and the data flows through from master to slaves. If you
want, you can configure the replication to replicate configuration
files across the cluster (although to me my deploy script does this).
I'd recommend tweaking the
This is great thanks for this post! I was curious about the same thing
and was wondering why "fl" couldn't return the "indexed"
representation of a field if that field were only indexed but not
stored. My thoughts were return something than nothing but I didn't
pay attention to the fact that gettin
The wiki should probably be updated.. maybe I'll take a stab at it.
I'll also try and update my article referenced there too.
When you checkout the project from SVN, do "ant eclipse"
Look at this bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3817) and
either run the ruby program or download the
I have wondered about this too but instead why not just set your cache
sizes large enough to house most/all of your documents and pre-warm
the caches accordingly? My bet is that a large enough document cache
may suffice but that's just a guess.
- Amit
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Kiran Jayak
If the fact that it's "original" vs "generic" is a field "is_original"
0/1 can you sort by is_original? Similarly, could you put a huge boost
on is_original in the dismax so that document matches on is_original
score higher than those that aren't original? Or is your goal to not
show generics *at a
Is there any reason why the log function shouldn't be modified to
always take 1+the number being requested to be log'ed? Reason I ask is
I am taking the log of the value output by another function which
could return 0. For testing, I modified it to return 1 which works but
would rather have the log
There's a couple ways to accomplish this from easy to hard depending
on your database schema:
1) Use DB trigger
-> I don't like triggers too much b/c to me they couple your
database layer with your application layer which leads to untestable
and sometimes unmaintainable code
-> Also it gets dif
I think one way to do this is issue another query and set a bunch of
filter queries to restrict "interesting_facet" to just those ten
values returned in the first query.
fq=interesting_facet:1 OR interesting_facet:2 etc&q=context:
Does that help?
Amit
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Finotti Sim
gram into result named list
> http://searchhub.org/dev/2012/02/10/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/
>
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Amit Nithian wrote:
>
>> We have a federated search product that issues multiple parallel
>> queries to solr cores and fetches the re
Is there a maven repository location that contains the nightly build
Maven artifacts of Solr? Are SNAPSHOT releases being generated by
Jenkins or anything so that when I re-resolve the dependencies I'd get
the latest snapshot jars?
Thanks
Amit
I think you'd want to start by looking at the rb.getQuery() in the
prepare (or process if you are trying to do post-results analysis).
This returns a Query object that would contain everything in that and
I'd then look at the Javadoc to see how to traverse it. I'm sure some
runtime type-casting may
ion from the class
> org.apache.lucene.search.Query
> I can just iterate over the terms using the method extractTerms. How can I
> extract the operators?
>
> 2012/10/4 Amit Nithian
>
>> I think you'd want to start by looking at the rb.getQuery() in the
>> prepare (or
What's preventing you from using the spell checker and take the #1
result and re-issue the query from a sub-class of the query component?
It should be reasonably fast to re-execute the query from the server
side since you are already within Solr. You can modify the response to
indicate that the new
Hi all,
I've been working with using Solr's post filters/delegate collectors
to collect some statistics about the scores of all the documents and
had a few questions with regards to this when combined with grouping
and sorting:
1) I noticed that if I don't include the "score" field as part of the
Are you looking for the sum of the scores of each document in the
result? In other words, if there were 1000 documents in the numFound
but you only of course show 10 (or 0 depending on rows parameter) you
want the sum of all the scores of 1000 documents in a separate section
of the results?
If so,
I see that when there are 0 results with the grouping enabled, the max
score is -Infinity which causes parsing problems on my client. Without
grouping enabled the max score is 0.0. Is there any particular reason
for this difference? If not, would there be any resistance to
submitting a patch that w
I am not sure if this repository
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/ works but
the modification dates seem reasonable given the timing of the
release. I suspect it'll be on maven central soon (hopefully)
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Grzegorz Sobczyk
wrote:
> Hello
>
Hi all,
I know there have been many posts about this already and I have done
my best to read through them but one lingering question remains. When
doing performance testing on a Solr instance (under normal production
like circumstances, not the ones where commits are happening more
frequently than
What about querying on the dynamic lat/long field to see if there are
documents that do not have the dynamic _latlon0 or whatever defined?
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:17 AM, darul wrote:
> I have already tried but get a nice exception because of this field type :
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in
So here is my spec for lat/long (similar to yours except I explicitly
define the sub-field names for clarity)
So then the query would be location_0_latLon:[ * TO *].
Looking at your schema, my guess would be:
location_0_coordinate:[* TO *]
location_1_coordinate:[* TO *]
Let me know if that
Hi all,
Quick question. I've been reading up on the filter query and how it's
implemented and the multiple articles I see keep referring to this
notion of leap frogging and filter query execution in parallel with
the main query. Question: Can someone point me to the code that does
this so I can be
set intersection which is
> supplied into filtered search call
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/trunk/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java#L1474
>
> You are welcome.
>
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Amit Nithian wrote:
>
>> Hi al
0 docs hence why it never went down this leap
frog approach in my debugging.
Next question though is what is the significance of this < 100? Is
this supposed to be a heuristic for determining the sparseness of the
filter bit set?
Thanks again
Amit
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Amit Nithi
On the surface this looks like you could use the minimum should match
feature of the dismax handler and alter that behavior depending on
whether or not the search is your main search or your fallback search
as you described in your (c) case.
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Uma Mahesh wrote:
> Hi
I'm not 100% sure about this but looks like update processors may help?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateRequestProcessor
It looks like you can put in custom code to execute when certain
actions happen so sounds like this is what you are looking for.
Cheers
Amit
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 8:43 AM,
Since Lucene is a library there isn't much of a support for this since
in theory the client application issuing the delete could also then do
something else upon delete. solr on the other hand being a layer (a
server layer) sitting on top of lucene, it makes sense for hooks to be
configured there.
Is the goal to have the elevation data read from somewhere else? In
other words, why don't you want the elevate.xml to exist locally?
If you want to read the data from somewhere else, could you put a
dummy elevate.xml locally and subclass the QueryElevationComponent and
override the loadElevationM
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
