I need to write some tests which I hope to do tonight and then I think it'll get into 4.2
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:24 AM, Nicholas Ding <nicholas...@gmail.com>wrote: > Thanks Amit, that's cool! So it will also be fixed on Solr 4.2, right? > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Amit Nithian <anith...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah I had a similar problem. I filed and submitted this patch: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4310 > > > > Let me know if this is what you are looking for! > > Amit > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Teun Duynstee <t...@duynstee.com> > wrote: > > > > > Ah, I see. The docs say "Although this result format does not have as > > much > > > information, it may be easier for existing solr clients to parse". I > > guess > > > the ngroups value could be added to this format, but apparently it > > isn't. I > > > do agree with you that to be usefull (as in possible to read for a > client > > > that doesn't know of the grouped format), the number should be that of > > the > > > groups, not of the documents. > > > > > > A quick glance in the code learns that it is indeed not calculated in > > this > > > case. But not completely trivial to fix. Could you use format=simple > > > instead? That will work with ngroups. > > > > > > Teun > > > > > > > > > 2013/2/25 Nicholas Ding <nicholas...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > Thanks Teun and Carlos, I set group.ngroups=true, but I don't have > this > > > > "ngroup" number when I was using group.main = true. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Carlos Maroto < > > > > cmar...@searchtechnologies.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Use group.ngroups, check it in the Solr wiki for FieldCollapsing > > > > > > > > > > Carlos Maroto > > > > > Search Architect at Search Technologies ( > www.searchtechnologies.com) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Nicholas Ding <nicholas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I grouped the result, and set group.main=true. I was expecting the > > > > numFound > > > > > equals to the number of groups, but actually it was not. > > > > > > > > > > How do I get the number of groups? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Nicholas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
