Hi Alex,
That sounds similar. I am puzzled by what I am seeing because it looks
like a major bug and I am following the docs for curl as closely as
possible, but hardly anyone else seems to have noticed it. To me it is a
show-stopper.
If I convert the docs to txt with html2text first then I
Hello,
I am very new to Solr, I want to write a simple Java program to get a core's
schema information. Like how many field and details of each field. I spent a
few time searching on internet, but cannot get much information about this. The
solrj wiki seems not updated for long time. I am using
I was always under the impression that a search component couldn't
modify the output of a previous search component. If it can, then the
highlight component could add its results to the output of the query
component, and we're done.
Upayavira (who sees the confusion on people's faces often when he
Hello Bernd,
I recently committed [subquery] document transformer which sounds pretty
much the same.
Find the details at
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Transforming+Result+Documents
It's not yet released, thus I appreciate if you take a nightly build from
https://builds.apache.or
Querying the schema can be done with the Schema API (
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Schema+API), which is
fully supported by SolrJ:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/6_0_0/solr-solrj/org/apache/solr/client/solrj/request/schema/package-summary.html
.
Liu, Ming (Ming) schrieb am Di.,
>> From the same page, extractFormat=text only applies when extractOnly
>> is true, which just shows the output from tika without indexing the document.
Y, sorry. I just looked through the source code. You're right. If you use
DIH (TikaEntityProcessor) instead of Solr Cell (ExtractingDocumen
I am using Java 8 (JDK 1.8.091) and it’s an application layer on top of
Solr 6 using SolrJ.
Here is the section of my pom.xml
org.apache.solr
solr-solrj
6.0.0
I had to manually load the driver
(“org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io.sql.DriverImpl")
to
Hi Mikhail,
I will check that out, thanks.
Regards,
Bernd
Am 31.05.2016 um 10:53 schrieb Mikhail Khludnev:
> Hello Bernd,
>
> I recently committed [subquery] document transformer which sounds pretty
> much the same.
> Find the details at
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Transf
Hi All,
I've noticed on some of my solr nodes that the disk usage is increasing
over time. After checking the output of lsof I found hundreds of
references to deleted index files being held by solr. This totaled 24GB
on a 16GB index. A restart of solr can obviously fix this but this is
not an
Thank you Mugeesh.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Mugeesh Husain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To read out this document
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Shards+and+Indexing+Data+in+SolrCloud
> for proper understanding.
>
> FYI, you are using implicit router, a document will be divided
Hi,
I have a requirement to sort records in one core/ collection based on a
field in
another core/collection.
Could some one please advise how it can be done in SOLR.
I have used !join to restrict documents in one core based on field values
in another core. Is there some way to sort like that?
Hi,
My core does not have a field say *fieldnew*.
*Case 1:-*
But in my results I would like to have *fieldnew *also and my results
should be sorted on only this new field.
*Case 2:-*
Just adding one more case further.
Suppose I have other fields also in the sort criteria and *fieldnew *is one
am
I really don't understand this. If you don't have
"fieldnew", where is the value coming from? It's
not in the index so
If you mean you're _adding_ a field after the index
already has some docs in it, then the normal
sort rules apply and you can specify sortMisingFirst/Last
to tell Solr where o
Join doesn't work like that, which is why it's referred
to as "pseudo join". There's no way that I know of
to do what you want here.
I'd strongly recommend you flatten your data at index time.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Mark Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement to so
Possibly:
SOLR-9116 or SOLR-9117? Note those two require that the core be
reloaded, so you have to be doing something a bit unusual for them to
be the problem.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Gavin Harcourt
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've noticed on some of my solr nodes that the disk usa
First, when changing the topic of the thread, please start a new thread. This
is called "thread hijacking" and makes it difficult to find threads later.
Collection aliasing does not do _anything_ about adding/deleting/whatever.
It's just a way to do exactly what you want. Your clients point to
myc
Those two bugs would make sense as we have been reloading the cores
quite frequently recently to apply new config and schema changes. I'll
keep an eye on the situation now our reload spree has ended and see if
it recurs.
Thanks,
Gavin.
On 31/05/16 16:14, Erick Erickson wrote:
Possibly:
SOLR-
Hi Mugeesh,
I was speculating whether sharding is done on:
1. index terms with each shard having the whole document space.
2. document space with each shard have num(documents/no. of shards) of the
documents divided between them.
Regards,
Sid.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:19 AM, Mugeesh Husain w
Hi,
I was speculating whether sharding is done on:
1. index terms with each shard having the whole document space.
2. document space with each shard have num(documents/no. of shards) of the
documents divided between them.
Regards,
Sid.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:27 AM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu <
Thanks for the reply Eric!
Can we write a custom sort component to achieve this?...
I am thinking of normalizing as the last option as clear separation of the
cores helps me.
Thanks!
Mark.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Join doesn't work like that, which is why it's
Both.
One shard will have roughly half the documents, and the indices built from
them; the other shard will have the other half of the documents, and the
indices built from those.
There won't be one location that contains all the documents, nor all the
indices.
-Original Message-
From
sorry Eric... I did not phrase it right ... what I meant was the field is
there in the schema, but I do not have values for it when normal indexing
happens.
When a query comes in, I want to populate value for this field in the
results based on some values passed in the query.
So what needs to be ac
We have seen the following error on four separate instances of Solr. The
result is that all or most shards go into "Down" state and do not recover
on restart of Solr.
I'm hoping one of you has some insight into what might be causing it as we
haven't been able to track down the issue or reproduce i
On 5/31/2016 10:16 AM, Mark Robinson wrote:
> sorry Eric... I did not phrase it right ... what I meant was the field is
> there in the schema, but I do not have values for it when normal indexing
> happens.
> When a query comes in, I want to populate value for this field in the
> results based on s
On 5/31/2016 9:53 AM, Siddhartha Singh Sandhu wrote:
> I was speculating whether sharding is done on: 1. index terms with
> each shard having the whole document space. 2. document space with
> each shard have num(documents/no. of shards) of the documents divided
> between them.
If the router for
Interesting developments :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176
I think we found why term Enum seems slower in recent Solr !
In our case it is likely to be related to the commit I mention in the Jira.
Have a check Joel !
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
abenede
I think we found our performance killer here :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176
Basically we were thinking to use Term Enum, but actually under the hood
Solr forces you to use FCS with single valued numeric fields.
In Solr 4 was not like that.
I checked the commit related , and it
Further investigations lead to :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9176
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
abenede...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> It has been a while I was thinking about this and yesterday I took a look
> into the code :
>
> I was wondering if
I forgot to add that this is Apache Solr 5.3.1.
There are three collections, two of which have one shard and and the other
has 3-5 shards. Approximately 200,000 documents across all collections.
Jon Drews
jondrews.com
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Jon Drews wrote:
> We have seen the follow
You mentioned that you had to use Class.foreName() for other drivers as
well. Possibly there is something in your setup that is suppressing the
driver auto loading.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Vachon, Jean-Sébastien <
jvac...@cebglobal.com> wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to install Solr 6.0.0 and have been successful with the default
installation, following the instructions provided on the Apache Solr
website. However, I do not want Solr running on port 8983, I want it to run
on port 80. I started a new Ubuntu 14.04 VM, installed open JDK 8, the
This may be no help at all, but my first thought is to wonder if anything
else is already running on port 80?
That might explain the somewhat silent "fail"...
Nicely said by the way - resisting the urge
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Teague James
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to install S
Cool, please let us know what you find out.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Gavin Harcourt
wrote:
> Those two bugs would make sense as we have been reloading the cores quite
> frequently recently to apply new config and schema changes. I'll keep an eye
> on the situation now our reload spree has
On 5/31/2016 2:02 PM, Teague James wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to install Solr 6.0.0 and have been successful with
> the default installation, following the instructions provided on the
> Apache Solr website. However, I do not want Solr running on port 8983,
> I want it to run on port 80. I started
When I try to launch Solr 6.0 in cloud mode and connect it to a specific
chroot in zookeeper that doesn't exist, I get an error in my solr.log.
That's expected, but the solr process continues to launch and succeeds.
Why wouldn't we want the start process simply to fail and exit?
There's no mechan
To have Lucene/Solr do the sorting, your value must be in the
docs at search time. Consider the clause "&sort=my_field asc".
If rows=10, then only the top 10 docs are kept. So if a doc's score
is non-zero, it's value is compared against the 10 docs in the list and
either replaces one or is discarde
On 5/31/2016 2:34 PM, jimtronic wrote:
> When I try to launch Solr 6.0 in cloud mode and connect it to a specific
> chroot in zookeeper that doesn't exist, I get an error in my solr.log.
> That's expected, but the solr process continues to launch and succeeds.
>
> Why wouldn't we want the start pro
Hello Mark,
Is it sounds like what's described at
http://blog-archive.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Mark Robinson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement to sort records in one core/ collection based on a
> field in
> another core/c
Thank you Kiran. Simple and nice. I lost a day today trying to make the
delta-import work.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-Delete-with-Full-Import-tp4040070p4279981.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
All --
I'm now attempting to use the hon_lucene_synonyms project from github.
I found the documents that were infered by the dead links on the readme in
the repository -- however, given that I'm using Solr 5.4.x, I no longer
have the need to integrate into a war file (as far as I can see).
The s
The retry logic for errors in construction of SolrZooKeeper was added in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8599 and is in 5.5.1 and 6.0. I
wonder if either that is not working as expected during startup or if
startup is following a different code path.
- Dennis
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:
Thanks Shawn. I'm leaning towards a retry as well.
So, there's no mechanism that currently exists within Solr that would allow
me to automatically retry the zookeeper connection on launch?
My options then would be:
1. Externally monitor the status of Solr (eg
/solr/admin/collections?action=CLUST
The docs are out of date for the synonym_edismax but it does work. Check
out the tests for working examples. I'll try to update it soon. I've run
the plugin on Solr 5 and 6, solrcloud and standalone. For running in
SolrCloud make sure you follow
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Addi
Many thanks Joe! I'll follow the instructions on the linked webpage.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Joe Lawson <
jlaw...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
> The docs are out of date for the synonym_edismax but it does work. Check
> out the tests for working examples. I'll try to update it soon
I’ve generally been dropping foreign plugin jars in this dir:
server/solr-webapp/webapp/WEB-INF/lib/
This is because it then gets loaded by the same classloader as Solr itself,
which can be useful if you’re, say, overriding some solr-protected-space method.
If you don’t care about the classloader
Thanks Jeff,
I believe I tried that, and it still refused to load.. But I'd sure love
it to work since the other process is a bit convoluted - although I see
it's value in a large Solr installation.
When I "locate" the jar on the linux command line I get:
/opt/solr-5.4.0/server/solr-webapp/weba
Jeff - Looking at the page, I'm unclear exactly how to set things up. I
get using the blob api and I get adding the blob/jar to the collection, but
the bit about runtimeLib=true is confusing.
Does that go on the entry in the solrconfig.xml file like this? Is
anything else required? (The bit a
: When a query comes in, I want to populate value for this field in the
: results based on some values passed in the query.
: So what needs to be accommodated in the result depends on a parameter in
: the query and I would like to sort the final results on this field also,
: which is dynamically p
I don't think it is 8812. q.op was completely ignored by edismax prior to
5.5, so it is not mm that changed.
If you do the same 5.4 query with q.op=OR I suspect it will not change the
debug query at all.
On 30 May 2016 at 21:07, Jan Høydahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This may be related to SOLR-8812, but
Sorry about that.
Thank you for your explanation. I still have some questions on using and
setting up collection alias for my current situation. I will start a new
threadon this.
On 5/31/2016 11:21 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
First, when changing the topic of the thread, please start a new thr
On 5/31/2016 3:13 PM, John Bickerstaff wrote:
> The suggestion on the readme is that I can drop the
> hon_lucene_synonyms jar file into the $SOLR_HOME directory, but this
> does not seem to be working - I'm getting class not found exceptions.
What I typically do with *all* extra jars (dataimport,
51 matches
Mail list logo
