First, when changing the topic of the thread, please start a new thread. This
is called "thread hijacking" and makes it difficult to find threads later.

Collection aliasing does not do _anything_ about adding/deleting/whatever.
It's just a way to do exactly what you want. Your clients point to
mycollection.

You use the CREATEALIAS command to point mycollection to mycollection_1.
Thereafter you can do anything you want to mycollection_1 using either name.

That is, you can address mycollection_1 explicitly. You can use mycollection. It
doesn't matter.

Then you can create mycollection_2. So far you can _only_ address mycollection_2
explicitly. You then use the CREATEALIAS to point mycollection at
mycollection_2.
At that point, anybody using mycollection will start working with
mycollection_2.

Meanywhile, mycollection_1 is still addressable (presumably by the back end) by
addressing it explicitly rather than through an alias. It has _not_ been changed
in any way by creating the new alias.

Best,
Erick

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com> wrote:
> Hi Erick
>
> Thank you for pointing out the sort behaviour of numbers in a string field.
> I did not think of that. Will use float.
>
> Would like to know how would you guys handle the usage of collection alias
> in my case.
> I have a 'product' collectionand Icreate a new collection'product_tmp' for
> this field type change and index into it. I create an alias 'product' on
> this new 'product_tmp' collection.
> IfI were to index to or delete documents from the 'product' collection, SOLR
> will index on and delete from 'product_tmp' collection, am I right?
> That means the 'product' collection cannot be usedanymore?
> Even if I were to create an alias 'product_old' on 'product'
> collection;issue a delete all documents or index on 'product_old', SOLR will
> delete or index on 'product_tmp' collection instead?
>
> My intention is to avoid having to updatethe clients serversto point to
> 'product_tmp' collection.
>
>
> On 5/31/2016 10:57 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>>
>> bq: Should I change the field type to "float" or "string"?
>>
>> I'd go with float. Let's assume you want to sort by
>> this field. 1000000000.00 sorts before 9.0 if you
>> just use Strings. Plus floats are generally much more
>> compact.
>>
>> bq: do I need to delete all documents in the index and do a full indexing
>>
>> That's the way I'd do it. You can always index to a _new_ collection
>> (assuming SolrCloud) and use collection aliasing to switch your
>> search all at once
>>
>> Best,
>> Erick
>>
>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Derek Poh <d...@globalsources.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am using solr 4.10.4.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5/29/2016 3:52 PM, Derek Poh wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I have a field that is of "int" type currentlyand it's values are whole
>>>> numbers.
>>>>
>>>> <field name="P_SupplierNeedinessIdx" type="int" indexed="true"
>>>> stored="true" multiValued="false"/>
>>>>
>>>> Due tochange inbusiness requirement, this field will need to take in
>>>> decimal numbers as well.
>>>> This fieldis sorted onand filter by range (field:[ 1 to *]).
>>>>
>>>> Should I change the field type to "float" or "string"?
>>>> For the change to take effect, do I need to delete all documents in the
>>>> index and do a full indexing? Or I can just do a full indexing without
>>>> theneed to delete all documents first?
>>>>
>>>> Derek
>>>>
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>>> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
>>>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have
>>>> received this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and
>>>> delete this e-mail (including any attachments) from your computer, and
>>>> you
>>>> must not use, disclose to anyone else or copy this e-mail (including any
>>>> attachments), whether in whole or in part.
>>>> This e-mail and any reply to it may be monitored for security, legal,
>>>> regulatory compliance and/or other appropriate reasons.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
>>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have
>>> received this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and
>>> delete this e-mail (including any attachments) from your computer, and
>>> you
>>> must not use, disclose to anyone else or copy this e-mail (including any
>>> attachments), whether in whole or in part.
>>> This e-mail and any reply to it may be monitored for security, legal,
>>> regulatory compliance and/or other appropriate reasons.
>>
>>
>
>
> ----------------------
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have
> received this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and
> delete this e-mail (including any attachments) from your computer, and you
> must not use, disclose to anyone else or copy this e-mail (including any
> attachments), whether in whole or in part.
> This e-mail and any reply to it may be monitored for security, legal,
> regulatory compliance and/or other appropriate reasons.

Reply via email to