I believe that very many installations of solr actually need a query
expansion such as the one you describe below with an indexing of each
textual fields in multiple forms (string, straight
(whitespace/ideaograms), stemmed, phonetic).
Thanks to edismax, I think, you would do the following expansi
Hello,
I'm using solr 4.8.1. Using edismax as the parser we got the undesirable
parsed queries and results. The following is two different cases with
strange behavior: Searching with these parameters
"mm":"2",
"df":"TotalField",
"debug":"true",
"indent":"true",
"fl":"Title",
"start":"
Which is what I believe Ted Sullivan is working on and presented at
the latest Lucene/Solr Revolution. His presentation does not seem to
be up, but he was writing about it on:
http://lucidworks.com/blog/author/tedsullivan/
Regards,
Alex.
Solr Analyzers, Tokenizers, Filters, URPs and even
Alexandre,
I guess you are talking about that post:
http://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/06/06/query-autofiltering-extended-language-logic-search/
I think it is very often impossible to solve properly.
Words such as "direction" have very many meanings and would come in
different fields.
In IMDB, wo
I debugged the query and found the query has been translated into
_text_:Kate AND _text_:Winslet, which _text_ is the default search field.
Because my documents use parent/child relation it appeared that if there's
no exact match of Kate Winslet, solr will return all documents contains
"Kate" and "
If your goal is to have docs with "kate" and "winslet"
in the _name_ field be scored higher, just make that
explicit as
name:(kate AND winslet)
perhaps boosting as
name:(kate AND winslet)^10
or add it as a clause
q=kate AND winslet OR name:(kate AND winslet)^10
or even
q=kate AND winslet OR name:(k
hi,
if i understand well.
In the configuration following:
Could you tell me more about the edismax approach? I'm new to it. Thanks a
lot
On Sunday, November 1, 2015, Erick Erickson wrote:
> If your goal is to have docs with "kate" and "winslet"
> in the _name_ field be scored higher, just make that
> explicit as
> name:(kate AND winslet)
> perhaps boos
Greetings!
I want my spell-checker to be based on a file
(/usr/share/dict/linux.words should suffice). Word-breaks features
would also be a benefit. I have previously indexed my docs for
searching with minimal alterations to the baseline Solr configuration.
My "docs" are user-typed text, t
Is segment merging information logged at level finer than INFO? I have
application setup with INFO level logging and I am indexing documents at
rate of about few hundred a min. I am using default merge policy
parameters. However I never see logs that can give me information about
segment merging.
I've just read the post and it has addressed much of my issue. It is hard
to detect phrases and disambiguate phrases but some existing approaches
seem really promising.
On Sunday, November 1, 2015, Paul Libbrecht wrote:
> Alexandre,
>
> I guess you are talking about that post:
>
>
> http://lucid
You can turn on "infoStream" from the solrconfig:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/IndexConfig+in+SolrConfig#IndexConfiginSolrConfig-OtherIndexingSettings
Tomás
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Pushkar Raste
wrote:
> Is segment merging information logged at level finer than INFO?
That's what I observed as well. Perhaps there's a way to customize
SignatureUpdateProcessorFactory to support my use case. I'll look into the
source code and figure if there's a way to do it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-on-index-time-de-duplicati
Here's my configuration in schmea.xml for the JiebaTokenizerFactory.
Could there be any problems that might be causing the English characters
issue?
Regards,
Edwin
On 29 October 2015 at 17:51, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> I would like to check, is it p
Hi,
I have a setup of 12 shard cluster started with 28gb memory each on a
single server. There are no replica. The size of index is around 90gb on
each shard. The Solr version is 5.2.1.
When I query "network se*", the memory utilization goes upto 24-26 gb and
the query takes around 3+ minutes to e
Please explain following warning
Starting log replay
tlog{file=/mnt/vol1/path/data/tlog/tlog.0060544 refcount=2}
active=false starting pos=0
Is there any harm with this error ?
16 matches
Mail list logo
