If your goal is to have docs with "kate" and "winslet" in the _name_ field be scored higher, just make that explicit as name:(kate AND winslet) perhaps boosting as name:(kate AND winslet)^10 or add it as a clause q=kate AND winslet OR name:(kate AND winslet)^10 or even q=kate AND winslet OR name:(kate AND winslet)^10 OR name:"kate winslet"^20
Or use edismax to do this kind of thing for you, that's its purpose. Best, Erick On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Yangrui Guo <guoyang...@gmail.com> wrote: > I debugged the query and found the query has been translated into > _text_:Kate AND _text_:Winslet, which _text_ is the default search field. > Because my documents use parent/child relation it appeared that if there's > no exact match of Kate Winslet, solr will return all documents contains > "Kate" and "Winslet" in anywhere. However it will more sense if solr can > rank docs that have "Kate" and "Winslet" in the same field higher. Of > course I can use some NLP tricks with named entity recognition but it would > be more expensive to develop. > > On Sunday, November 1, 2015, Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net> wrote: > >> Alexandre, >> >> I guess you are talking about that post: >> >> >> http://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/06/06/query-autofiltering-extended-language-logic-search/ >> >> I think it is very often impossible to solve properly. >> >> Words such as "direction" have very many meanings and would come in >> different fields. >> In IMDB, words such as the names of persons would come in at least >> different roles; similarly, the actors' role's name is likely to match >> the family name of persons... >> >> Paul >> >> >> >> > As others indicated having intelligence to recognize the terms (e.g. >> > Kate should be in name) or some user indication to do so can make thing >> > more precise but is rarely done. >> > Alexandre Rafalovitch <mailto:arafa...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> > 1 novembre 2015 13:07 >> > Which is what I believe Ted Sullivan is working on and presented at >> > the latest Lucene/Solr Revolution. His presentation does not seem to >> > be up, but he was writing about it on: >> > http://lucidworks.com/blog/author/tedsullivan/ >> >> > Erick Erickson <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> >> > 1 novembre 2015 07:40 >> > Yeah, that's actually a tough one. You have no control over what the >> > user types, >> > you have to try to guess what they meant. >> >>
