Could you tell me more about the edismax approach? I'm new to it. Thanks a lot
On Sunday, November 1, 2015, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > If your goal is to have docs with "kate" and "winslet" > in the _name_ field be scored higher, just make that > explicit as > name:(kate AND winslet) > perhaps boosting as > name:(kate AND winslet)^10 > or add it as a clause > q=kate AND winslet OR name:(kate AND winslet)^10 > or even > q=kate AND winslet OR name:(kate AND winslet)^10 OR name:"kate winslet"^20 > > > Or use edismax to do this kind of thing for you, that's > its purpose. > > Best, > Erick > > On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Yangrui Guo <guoyang...@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > I debugged the query and found the query has been translated into > > _text_:Kate AND _text_:Winslet, which _text_ is the default search field. > > Because my documents use parent/child relation it appeared that if > there's > > no exact match of Kate Winslet, solr will return all documents contains > > "Kate" and "Winslet" in anywhere. However it will more sense if solr can > > rank docs that have "Kate" and "Winslet" in the same field higher. Of > > course I can use some NLP tricks with named entity recognition but it > would > > be more expensive to develop. > > > > On Sunday, November 1, 2015, Paul Libbrecht <p...@hoplahup.net > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> Alexandre, > >> > >> I guess you are talking about that post: > >> > >> > >> > http://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/06/06/query-autofiltering-extended-language-logic-search/ > >> > >> I think it is very often impossible to solve properly. > >> > >> Words such as "direction" have very many meanings and would come in > >> different fields. > >> In IMDB, words such as the names of persons would come in at least > >> different roles; similarly, the actors' role's name is likely to match > >> the family name of persons... > >> > >> Paul > >> > >> > >> > >> > As others indicated having intelligence to recognize the terms (e.g. > >> > Kate should be in name) or some user indication to do so can make > thing > >> > more precise but is rarely done. > >> > Alexandre Rafalovitch <mailto:arafa...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > >> > 1 novembre 2015 13:07 > >> > Which is what I believe Ted Sullivan is working on and presented at > >> > the latest Lucene/Solr Revolution. His presentation does not seem to > >> > be up, but he was writing about it on: > >> > http://lucidworks.com/blog/author/tedsullivan/ > >> > >> > Erick Erickson <mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > >> > 1 novembre 2015 07:40 > >> > Yeah, that's actually a tough one. You have no control over what the > >> > user types, > >> > you have to try to guess what they meant. > >> > >> >
