Thanks, I think the NgramFitlerFactory is the good filter, I will try it
today
but what if I want to search for query :* dom host *and get the result:
*domhost*
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Start-With-and-contain-search-tp4171854p4172031.html
Sent from th
Hi All,
I have a requirement to get the list of *collection* available in Solr. we
are using solrj library.
I am able to fetch the list of cores but not getting ways to fetch the list
of collections.
Below is the sample example, that i am using to fetch the cores:
CoreAdminRequest reque
Hi,
I have a solr collection with 16 millions documents and growing daily with
1 documents
recently it is becoming slow to answer my request ( several seconds)
specially when I use multi-words query
I am running solr on a machine with 32G RAM but heavy used one
What are my options to optimize
If you performance was fine but degraded over the time it might be
easier to check / increase the memory to have better disk caching.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 02.12.14 09:27, melb wrote:
Hi,
I have a solr collection with 16 millions documents and growing daily with
1 documents
recen
Yes performance degraded over the time, I can raise the memory but I can't
do it every time and the volume will keep growing
Is it better to put the solr on dedicated machine?
Is there any thing else that can be done to the solr instance for example
deviding the collection?
rgds,
--
View this
Thanks for the clarification, I indeed mixed it with UpdateRequestHandler.
On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 11:24 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : I thought that the auto commit is per update handler because they are
> : configured within the update handler tag.
>
> is not the same thing as a that does
Hi,
If I have a master/slave setup and the master index gets corrupted, will the
slaves realize they should not replicate from the master anymore, since the
master does not have a newer index version?
I'm using Solr version 4.2.1.
Regards,
Johannes
Dear Erick,
Thanks for your thoughts, it helped me a lot. In my instances no solr logs
are appended in to catalina.out.
Now I placed the log4j.properties file. Solr logs are captured in solr.log
file with the help of it I found the reason for the issue.
I am starting tomcat with the option -Dboo
Small update,
I have managed making the Term Vector to work and I am getting all the words
of the text field.
The problem is that it doesn't work with several words combined, I can't
find the offset of the needed expression starts...
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
It's not clear what you actually mean with that space. Do you mean any
two words should try to match as if they were one? What's the
business-level description of what you are trying to do?
Also, you are not reinventing https://domainr.com/ , are you? If you
are, search around, I think they had so
Yes this is exactly what I am trying to do but with less extended database
can I do it with solr?
rgds,
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Start-With-and-contain-search-tp4171854p4172105.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Well, if all you are doing is substring searches, then Solr could be
an overkill. But if you doing a search and then want to do faceting or
additional query, then Solr is a good bet.
And yes, it can do it, you just need to really understand your input
patterns and what you want to find with them.
I think you want CloudSolrServer.getCollectionList()
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Ankit Jain wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a requirement to get the list of *collection* available in Solr. we
> are using solrj library.
>
> I am able to fetch the list of cores but not getting ways to
bq: Is it better to put the solr on dedicated machine?
Yes, absolutely. Solr _likes_ memory, and on a
machine with lots of other processes you'll keep
running into this problem.
FWIW, I've seen between 10M and 300M docs fit into
16G for the JVM. But see Uwe's excellent blog on MMapDirectory
and n
No. The master is the master and will always stay the master
unless you change it. This is one of the reasons I really like
to keep the original source around in case I every have this
problem.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Charra, Johannes
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I have a master/sla
Glad you found a solution!
Best,
Erick
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Doss wrote:
> Dear Erick,
>
> Thanks for your thoughts, it helped me a lot. In my instances no solr logs
> are appended in to catalina.out.
>
> Now I placed the log4j.properties file. Solr logs are captured in solr.log
> file
It might be a good idea to
* move SOLR to a dedicated box :-)
* load your SOLR server with 20.000.000 documents (the estimated number of
documents after three years) and do performance testing & tuning
Afterwards you have some hard facts about hardware sizing and expected
performance for the ne
Thanks for your response, Erick.
Do you think it is possible to corrupt an index merely with HTTP requests? I've
been using the aforementioned m/s setup for years now and have never seen a
master failure.
I'm trying to think of scenarios where this setup (1 master, 4 slaves) might
have a tota
Hi
Is it possible to formulate a Solr query which finds all documents which have
the same value in a particular field?
Note, I don't know what the value is, I just want to find all documents with
duplicate values.
For example, I have 5 documents:
Doc1: field Name = Peter
Doc2: field Name = Jac
Sort of… if you indexed the full value of the field (and you’re looking for
truly exact matches) as a string field type you could facet on that field with
facet.mincount=2 and the facets returned would be the ones with duplicate
values. You’d have to drill down on each of the facets returned to
Have you tried using result grouping for your query? There are some very good
examples in the wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing
Gonzalo
-Original Message-
From: Peter Kirk [mailto:p...@alpha-solutions.dk]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2014 9:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.a
Hi,
It seems that when I do a phrase search, SOLR's spellchecker would return
correctlySpelled=true if at least one term in the phrase was correctly spelled.
For example:
If I search for "soriasis treatment", SOLR returns over 8000 search results for
"treatment", correctlySpelled: true, and a sp
And if I am correct, enabling docValues will do this kind of grouping
as part of the indexing with docValues data structure (per segment).
So, all one has to do is to get it back (through faceting).
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newslett
Hi alex thnx .i was able to get the get the suggestion for thri book as "
the book of three".but when i search for threebook (three and book are now
combined)then i am not able to get the suggestn for "a book of three".how
we solve this?
On 01-Dec-2014 9:34 PM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote:
> If
Thanks!
I will take a look at this. I do have an additional question, since after a
bunch of digging I believe I am going to run into another dead end.
I want to execute the join (or rollup) query, but I want the facets to
represent the facets of all the child documents, not the resulting produ
Hi all,
I am using Solr 4.9.0 to index a DB with DIH. In the DB there is a URL
field. In the DIH Tika uses that field to fetch and parse the documents. The
URL from the field is valid and will download the document in the browser
just fine. But Tika is getting HTTP response code 400. Any ideas why
Well, how would you expect it to solve it - in non-technical terms.
What's the high level description of "book of three" matching
"threebook" and not say "threeof"? Random permutation of any two
words? It's a bit of a strange requirement so far.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts
On 2 December 2014 at 13:19, Teague James wrote:
> clob="true"
What does ClobTransformer is doing on the DownloadURL field? Is it
possible it is corrupting the value somehow?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-s
Have you considered using grouping? If I understand your requirements,
I think it does what you want.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Result+Grouping
On 12/02/2014 12:59 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
Thanks!
I will take a look at this. I do have an additional question, since after a
I would keep trying with the highlighters. Some of them, at least, have
options to provide an external text source, although you will almost
certainly have to write some java code to get this working; extend the
highlighter you choose and supply its text from an external source.
-Mike
On 12
Hi,
Thanks for the response, I have considered grouping often, but grouping does
not return the parent document, just the group id. I would still have to add
something to take the group id’s and get the parent documents.
Thanks
Darin
> On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:11 PM, Michael Sokolov
> wrote:
>
We simply index parent and child documents with the same field value,
and group on that, querying both parent and child documents. If you
boost the parent it will show up as the first result in the group. Then
you get all related documents together. in the same group.
-Mike
On 12/02/2014 02:
Solr allows create an alias for few collection via its API
Suppose I have two collection C1 & C2 and an alias C3 = C1 , C2
C1 and C2 deployed on different machines , but has a mutual ZooKeeper .
How rank is affected when searching C3 collection ?
when they has same schema ?
different schema ?
Hello Searchers,
Don't you remember any examples of indexing numbers inside of plain text.
eg. if I have a text: "foo and 10 bars" I want to find it with a query like
foo [8 TO 20] bars.
The question no.1 whether to put trie terms into the separate field or they
can reside at the same text one? No
Mikhail - I can imagine a filter that strips out everything but numbers
and then indexes those with a (separate) numeric (trie) field. But I
don't believe you can do phrase or other proximity queries across
multiple fields. As long as an or-query is good enough, I think this
problem is not to
Hello Michael,
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:15 PM, Michael Sokolov <
msoko...@safaribooksonline.com> wrote:
> Mikhail - I can imagine a filter that strips out everything but numbers
> and then indexes those with a (separate) numeric (trie) field. But I don't
> believe you can do phrase or other pro
On 12/02/2014 03:41 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
Thanks for suggestions. Do I remember correctly that you ignored last
Lucene Revolution?
I wouldn't say I ignored it, but it's true I wasn't there in DC: I'm
excited to catch up on the presentations as the videos become available,
though.
-Mike
Hi Mikhail,
Range queries allowed inside phrases with ComplexPhraseQParser, but I think
string order is used.
Also LUCENE-5205 / SOLR-5410 is meant to supersede complex phrase. It might
have that functionality too.
Ahmet
On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:43 PM, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
Hel
If nothing else, the disk underlying the index could have a bad spot...
There have been some corrupt index bugs in the past, but they always
get a super-high priority for fixing so don't hang around for long.
You can always take periodic backups. Perhaps the slickest way to do that
is to set up a
HI Alex,
I have specified following in my solrconfig.xml ::
on
true
5
2
5
true
true
5
3
wordbreak
5
I have written wordbreak
5 to break the words with
minimum length 5.then it should break my word threebook as three and book
right?corre
HI Alex,
I have specified these in the solrconfig.xml as::
on
true
5
2
5
true
true
5
3
wordbreak
5 .
The lines wordbreak
5 are for breaking the
word threebook as three and book .But then too its not searching for the
string "A book of t
Sorry, beyond my area of expertise now. Hopefully somebody else will pitch in.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr-start.com/ and @solrstart
Solr popularizers community: https://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=6713853
42 matches
Mail list logo
