Thanks for your response, Erick. Do you think it is possible to corrupt an index merely with HTTP requests? I've been using the aforementioned m/s setup for years now and have never seen a master failure.
I'm trying to think of scenarios where this setup (1 master, 4 slaves) might have a total outage. The master runs on a h/a cluster. Regards, Johannes -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2014 15:54 An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Replication of a corrupt master index No. The master is the master and will always stay the master unless you change it. This is one of the reasons I really like to keep the original source around in case I every have this problem. Best, Erick On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Charra, Johannes <johannes.charrahorstm...@haufe-lexware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > If I have a master/slave setup and the master index gets corrupted, will the > slaves realize they should not replicate from the master anymore, since the > master does not have a newer index version? > > I'm using Solr version 4.2.1. > > Regards, > Johannes > >
