bq: Is it better to put the solr on dedicated machine? Yes, absolutely. Solr _likes_ memory, and on a machine with lots of other processes you'll keep running into this problem.
FWIW, I've seen between 10M and 300M docs fit into 16G for the JVM. But see Uwe's excellent blog on MMapDirectory and not over-allocating memory to the JVM here: http://blog.thetaphi.de/2012/07/use-lucenes-mmapdirectory-on-64bit.html Also see: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceProblems and http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPerformanceFactors Best, Erick On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:02 AM, melb <melaggo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes performance degraded over the time, I can raise the memory but I can't > do it every time and the volume will keep growing > Is it better to put the solr on dedicated machine? > Is there any thing else that can be done to the solr instance for example > deviding the collection? > > rgds, > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Slow-queries-tp4172032p4172039.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
