Hi,
I'm looking on some tips on how to create a new document schema and
add it to solr core at runtime. The use case that I'm trying to solve
is:
1. Using a custom configuration tool, user creates a solr schema
2. The schema is added (uploaded) to a solr instance (on a remote machine).
3. Documen
Hi,
Can anyone guide me as to how one can go on to implement a user defined
field types in solr? I could not find anything on the solr-wiki. Help of any
kind would be appreciated.
Regards,
Rishabh
Whilst many of the people on this list (myself included) have a pretty
good grasp of what is meant by the term facet, this is not clear to
people who approach the system from a more fresh point of view.
So, has anyone got a good example of the language they might use over,
say, a set of radio bu
On 11/12/2007, at 8:32 PM, Benjamin O'Steen wrote:
So, has anyone got a good example of the language they might use over,
say, a set of radio buttons and fields on a web form, to indicate that
selecting one or more of these would return facets. 'Show grouping by'
or 'List the sets that the result
Hi,
> So, has anyone got a good example of the language they might use over,
> say, a set of radio buttons and fields on a web form, to indicate that
> selecting one or more of these would return facets. 'Show grouping by'
> or 'List the sets that the results fall into' or something similar.
Here
That's what I was after.
As always, thanks for the quick response.
Tracy
On Dec 11, 2007, at 12:18 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Dec 10, 2007 11:22 PM, climbingrose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think there is a event listener interface for hooking into Solr
events
such as post commit, post opt
Hello all,
The titles of our docs have the form "ABC0001231-This is an important
doc.pdf". I would like to be able to
search for 'important', or '1231', or 'ABC000*', or 'This is an
important doc' in the title field. I looked a the NGramTokenizer and
tried to use it.
In the index it doesn't
I have successfully configured two parallel Solr webapps , however I
see that all data gets stored in one folder of my Tomcat installation,
namely C:\Tomcat\solr\data\index.
How can I configure that each Solr webapp shall store the data in the
folders I assigned at , where
already the Solr
I actually have a patch for solr config parser which allows you to use
context environment variables in the solrconfig.xml
I generally use it for development when I'm working with multiple
instances and different data dirs. I'll add it to jira today if you
want it.
P
Jörg Kiegeland wrote:
I
I actually have a patch for solr config parser which allows you to
use context environment variables in the solrconfig.xml
I generally use it for development when I'm working with multiple
instances and different data dirs. I'll add it to jira today if you
want it.
That would be nice.
Howeve
FAST calls them "navigators" (which I think is a terrible term - YMMV
of course :-))
I tend to think that "filters" -- or perhaps "dynamic filters" --
captures the essential function.
On Dec 11, 2007 2:38 AM, "DAVIGNON Andre - CETE NP/DIODé/PANDOC"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > So, has a
On Dec 11, 2007 5:17 AM, Rishabh Joshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can anyone guide me as to how one can go on to implement a user defined
> field types in solr?
At a higher level, what are you trying to accomplish?
If you just want to customize analysis, just copy and modify an
existing fieldTy
I use jvm system properties for this; they seem to work well.
-Mike
On 11-Dec-07, at 7:39 AM, patrick o'leary wrote:
I actually have a patch for solr config parser which allows you to
use context environment variables in the solrconfig.xml
I generally use it for development when I'm working w
JVM properties restrict you to a single implementation within a jvm.
For instance if you want multiple instances of solr running with the
same schema, with different data
dir's in the one app server. You'll have to have several copies of
solrconfig and schema.xml.
By using context environment
: However I cannot believe that one cannot configure this by someconfiguration
: file by now - what if only one index needs to be backuped and the other index
is the option you are looking forthe in solrconfig.xml ?
-Hoss
Hi all,
I've got a pattern in a document (call it "xy") that I want to turn
into two tokens - "xy" and "y".
One approach I could use is PatternTokenizer to extract "xy", and
then a custom filter that returns "xy" and then "y" on the next call
(caches the next result).
Or I could extend Pat
: I actually have a patch for solr config parser which allows you to use
: context environment variables in the solrconfig.xml
: I generally use it for development when I'm working with multiple
: instances and different data dirs. I'll add it to jira today if you
: want it.
yes please! ... Solr
On 11-Dec-07, at 11:51 AM, Ken Krugler wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a pattern in a document (call it "xy") that I want to turn
into two tokens - "xy" and "y".
One approach I could use is PatternTokenizer to extract "xy", and
then a custom filter that returns "xy" and then "y" on the next
cal
Martin,
Look into MultiCore (new stuff, some info on the Wiki) or into running multiple
Solrs inside a single JVM. We just did this with Jetty 6.1.6 for a client and
it works beautifully. This is also documented on the Wiki.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
-
Brian,
This is not really a job for n-grams. It sounds like you'll want to write a
custom Tokenizer that has knowledge about this particular pattern, knows how to
split input like the one in your example, and produce multiple tokens out of
it. For the natural language part you can probably ge
Keeping track of 1000+ indices is actually not that hard. I've implemented
Simpy - http://simpy.com - in a way that keeps each member's index (or indices
- some users have multiple indices) separate. I can't give out the total
number of Simpy users, but I can tell you it is weeell beyo
I asked a question similar to this back in
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200709.mbox/[EMAIL
PROTECTED] and didn't really find anyone who was doing this. What I wound up
doing was adding a variable to the context.xml file called contextRelativeHome:
solr/contextRel
You're right, I'm wrong. I certainly am willing to defer to someone
who's been there before .
On Dec 11, 2007 4:44 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Keeping track of 1000+ indices is actually not that hard. I've
> implemented Simpy - http://simpy.com - in a way that keeps each me
Maybe I'm confused. Can't you use the brand-spanking new MultiCore stuff for
this, or JNDI, as I just mentioned in the "Re: Solr, Multiple processes
running" thread?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: patrick o'leary <[EMAIL PRO
How much data are we talking about here? Because it seems *much* simpler
to just index a field with each document indicating the user and then just
AND that user's ID in with your query.
Or think about facets (although I admit I don't know enough about facets
to weigh in on its merits, it's just b
I think it all depends, what do you want out of Solr or FAST?
Thanks!
Matthew Runo
Software Developer
702.943.7833
On Dec 11, 2007, at 2:09 PM, William Silva wrote:
Hi,
How is the best way to compare SOLR and FAST Search ?
Thanks,
William.
Has anyone used Solr in a Flex application?
Any code snipplets to share?
Thank you.
Jennifer
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-and-Flex-tp14284703p14284703.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example.
What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ?
I would like a matrix comparing both.
Thanks,
William.
On Dec 11, 2007 8:15 PM, Matthew Runo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it all depends, what do you want out of Solr or FAST?
>
>
Stability and better Support (at great cost obviously)
On Dec 11, 2007 10:20 PM, William Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Why use FAST and not use SOLR ? For example.
> What will FAST offer that will justify the investment ?
> I would like a matrix comparing both.
> Thanks,
> William.
>
>
Since they all use the same schema, can you add a client ID to each document
when it is indexed? Filter by "clientid:4" and you get a subset of the
index.
wunder
On 12/11/07 1:01 PM, "Owens, Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> The system we're moving from (dtSearch) allows
On 10-Dec-07, at 12:50 PM, Doug T wrote:
I have been using parallelmultisearches on multi-CPU machines, and
seen
sizable benefit over a single large index (even if all of the
fragments are
on 1 disk). Is there a way to quickly enable this on a solr
server? Or do
I need to go into the so
Depends, if you are looking for a small sized index (gigabytes rather
than dozens or hundreds of gigabytes or terabytes) with relatively
simple requirements (a few facets, simple tokenization, English only
linguistics, etc.) Solr is likely to be appropriate for most cases.
FAST however give
Could you please elaborate on what you mean by ingestion pipeline and
horizontal scalability? I apologize if this is a stupid question
everyone else on the forum is familiar with.
Thanks,
Ravi
On Dec 12, 2007 1:09 AM, Nuno Leitao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Depends, if you are looking for a sma
FAST uses two pipelines - an ingestion pipeline (for document feeding)
and a query pipeline which are fully programmable (i.e., you can
customize it fully). At ingestion time you typically prepare documents
for indexing (tokenize, character normalize, lemmatize, clean up text,
perform ent
FAST is a little less flexible (no dynamic fields) and not programmable
at the Lucene level.
We recently switched from FAST to Solr because of cost reasons. They
did not know how to license us; they are used to, say, IBM running FAST
on hundreds of servers. We are a startup with very specific ne
"category counts"
On 11-Dec-07, at 6:38 PM, Norskog, Lance wrote:
In SQL terms they are: 'select unique'. Except on only one field.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Hornberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re
In SQL terms they are: 'select unique'. Except on only one field.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Hornberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:49 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Facets - What's a better term for non technical people?
FAST call
Just to comment on that last part:
"There are FAST deployments out there which run on dozens, in some
cases hundreds of nodes serving multiple terabyte size indexes and
achieving hundreds of queries per seconds."
There are also a lot of Lucene or Solr deployments with similar setups - I've
wo
Isn't that GROUP BY ColumnX, count(1) type of thing?
I'd think "group by" would be a good label.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
From: "Norskog, Lance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 20
39 matches
Mail list logo
