Isn't that GROUP BY ColumnX, count(1) type of thing? I'd think "group by" would be a good label.
Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch ----- Original Message ---- From: "Norskog, Lance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:38:37 PM Subject: RE: Facets - What's a better term for non technical people? In SQL terms they are: 'select unique'. Except on only one field. -----Original Message----- From: Charles Hornberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 9:49 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Facets - What's a better term for non technical people? FAST calls them "navigators" (which I think is a terrible term - YMMV of course :-)) I tend to think that "filters" -- or perhaps "dynamic filters" -- captures the essential function. On Dec 11, 2007 2:38 AM, "DAVIGNON Andre - CETE NP/DIODé/PANDOC" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > So, has anyone got a good example of the language they might use > > over, say, a set of radio buttons and fields on a web form, to > > indicate that selecting one or more of these would return facets. 'Show grouping by' > > or 'List the sets that the results fall into' or something similar. > > Here's what i found some time : > http://www.searchtools.com/info/faceted-metadata.html > > It has been quite useful to me. > > André Davignon > >
