You're right, I'm wrong. I certainly am willing to defer to someone who's been there before <G>.
On Dec 11, 2007 4:44 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Keeping track of 1000+ indices is actually not that hard. I've > implemented Simpy - http://simpy.com - in a way that keeps each member's > index (or indices - some users have multiple indices) separate. I can't > give out the total number of Simpy users, but I can tell you it is > weeeeeeellllll beyond 1000 :) > > Otis > -- > Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Erick Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2007 4:33:45 PM > Subject: Re: Solr, Multiple processes running > > How much data are we talking about here? Because it seems *much* > simpler > to just index a field with each document indicating the user and then > just > AND that user's ID in with your query. > > Or think about facets (although I admit I don't know enough about > facets > to weigh in on its merits, it's just been mentioned a lot). > > Keeping track of 1,000+ indexes seems like a maintenance headache, but > much depends upon how much data you're talking about. > > When replying, the number of documents is almost, but not quite > totally, useless unless combined with the number of fields you're > storing per doc, the average length of each field, etc <G>..... > > Erick > > On Dec 11, 2007 4:01 PM, Owens, Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > The system we're moving from (dtSearch) allows each of our clients to > have > > a search index. So far I have yet to find the options required to set > this, > > it seems I can only set the directory path before run time. > > > > Each of the indexes uses the same schema, same configuration just > > different data in each; what kind of performance penalty would I have > from > > running a new solr instance per required database? what is the best > way to > > track what port or what index is being used? would I be able to run > 1,000 or > > more solr instances without performance degradation? > > > > Thanks for your help. > > > > Best regards, Martin Owens > > > > > >
