context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/array-of-array-in-document-response-structure-tp4041494p4041623.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
like opening Pandora's
> Box :)
>
> Michaël : having parallel arrays and losing their relations is what I want
> to avoid, actually :)
>
> I guess I'll have to find another way.
>
> Thanks,
> Danny.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
//lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/array-of-array-in-document-response-structure-tp4041494p4041575.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
t; So I'm wondering if there's a way to store data in the index with arrays of
> arrays, which would yield something like this :
>
> http://pastebin.com/j3eY1eVv
>
> or something else, as long as the structure keeps the relations between
> array levels.
>
> Thanks
f there's a way to store data in the index with arrays of
> arrays, which would yield something like this :
>
> http://pastebin.com/j3eY1eVv
>
> or something else, as long as the structure keeps the relations between
> array levels.
>
> Thanks,
> Danny.
>
>
>
> --
etween
array levels.
Thanks,
Danny.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/array-of-array-in-document-response-structure-tp4041494p4041548.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
ere's a way to store data in the index with arrays of
> arrays, which would yield something like this :
>
>
>
> or something else, as long as the structure keeps the relations between
> array levels.
>
> Thanks,
> Danny.
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in
472066.n3.nabble.com/array-of-array-in-document-response-structure-tp4041494.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
