Danny, You don't lose their relations with parallel arrays, it's just that you can't *query* those relations. So for example, if you query: one:1 AND two:2, you'll get documents where both those values are set, but not ones where both of those values are *paired*.
Michael Della Bitta ------------------------------------------------ Appinions 18 East 41st Street, 2nd Floor New York, NY 10017-6271 www.appinions.com Where Influence Isn’t a Game On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Danny <daniel.baus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Erick : you're right, allowing nested arrays would be like opening Pandora's > Box :) > > Michaël : having parallel arrays and losing their relations is what I want > to avoid, actually :) > > I guess I'll have to find another way. > > Thanks, > Danny. > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/array-of-array-in-document-response-structure-tp4041494p4041575.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
