This isn't possible that I know of, and I'm skeptical that it would be embraced. The problem here is that this would break the current format pretty severely I think, making back-compat a pain. And then there would be the arrays-of-arrays-of-arrays, and supporting N-dimensional arrays seems like a place a search engine shouldn't go.
You can always store the data in any format you like. Stored="true" stores a verbatim copy of whatever you put in. The interesting question there would be how you tokenized/indexed the data (maybe you'd need a custom filter and/or tokenizer) to express the semantics of how you wanted to _search_ that data. Best Erick On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Danny <daniel.baus...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok :) > > I'm wondering if it is possible to have arrays of arrays in the response > structure. > For example, I can use DataImportHandler to index this XML file : > > http://pastebin.com/j2s3iVmk > > into this structure : > > http://pastebin.com/MJ7YYh0L > > But as you can see, in this index I lost the links between "two" elements > and "one" elements. > So I'm wondering if there's a way to store data in the index with arrays of > arrays, which would yield something like this : > > http://pastebin.com/j3eY1eVv > > or something else, as long as the structure keeps the relations between > array levels. > > Thanks, > Danny. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/array-of-array-in-document-response-structure-tp4041494p4041548.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
