SyntaxError on Tagging filters in fq

Hello, Since I am not sure it’s a bug or a known issue (I could not find any JIRA ticket related to this error) or even if it is on purpose, I am writing to this mailing first (before opening a JIRA ticket). We are using the tagging and excluding syntax in Solr and we have noticed that when

Re: facetting+tagging in JSON Query DSL

I suppose tagging won't work on below the top level like "filter":[{"bool":{"should":[{"#type_s":"type_s:article"}]}}] It should be something like "filter":["#type_s":{"bool":{" should":["type_s

Re: facetting+tagging in JSON Query DSL

https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/faceting.html#tagging-and-excluding-filters with JSON Query DSL: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/json-query-dsl.html#tagging-in-json-query-dsl here is the complete query - essential parts in red (see below): But it does not seem to work - ha

facetting+tagging in JSON Query DSL

Dear reader, I'm trying to do this: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/faceting.html#tagging-and-excluding-filters with JSON Query DSL: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_1/json-query-dsl.html#tagging-in-json-query-dsl here is the complete query - essential parts in red

Re: Faceting filter tagging doesn't work in case where 0 matches are found

>> the returned documents themselves. One of the use cases I want to employ >> is >> tagging filter queries for fields, and then exclude those filters when >> faceting. My problem is, however, that in those cases where the filter has >> 0 matches, the facets aren

Re: Faceting filter tagging doesn't work in case where 0 matches are found

> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 6:57 PM Arvydas Silanskas < > nma.arvydas.silans...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Good evening, > > > > I am using facet json api to query aggregation data, and I don't care > about > > the returned documents themselves. One of th

Re: Faceting filter tagging doesn't work in case where 0 matches are found

ggregation data, and I don't care about > the returned documents themselves. One of the use cases I want to employ is > tagging filter queries for fields, and then exclude those filters when > faceting. My problem is, however, that in those cases where the filter has > 0 matches

Faceting filter tagging doesn't work in case where 0 matches are found

Good evening, I am using facet json api to query aggregation data, and I don't care about the returned documents themselves. One of the use cases I want to employ is tagging filter queries for fields, and then exclude those filters when faceting. My problem is, however, that in those cases

Re: Tagging Locations using SynonymGraphFilterFactory

on > > > synonyms="locations-classifier.txt" ignoreCase="true" expand="false" > tokenizerFactory="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > > > > > thanks > > > > -- > View this message i

Tagging Locations using SynonymGraphFilterFactory

ens as one Wakefield West Yorkshire(1). Here is the analyzer field definition thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tagging-Locations-using-SynonymGraphFilterFactory-tp4329089.html Sent from the Solr - User mai

Re: Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

ng BlockJoin Queries and json facets (which it shouldn't). > > Let me know if you want me to do more research or have one more idea. > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:m...@apache.org] > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. August 2016 09:06 > An: s

Re: Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

I just tried to see what > it would do. > > So this is my current research result: > > When excluding a facet which has been tagged in a filter query, this facet > corresponding to the fq's tag disappears in the result set in solr 6.1 when > using BlockJoin Queries and js

AW: Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

ets (which it shouldn't). Let me know if you want me to do more research or have one more idea. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Mikhail Khludnev [mailto:m...@apache.org] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. August 2016 09:06 An: solr-user Betreff: Re: Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with Bl

Re: Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

x27;s a little bit slower that child.facet.field. > >Nevertheless, you can take this sample and add exclusion instructions > into. > >It should work. Let me know how does it, please. > > > >On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Moises > wrote: > > > >> Hi

AW: Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

17, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Moises wrote: > >> Hi Mikhail, >> >> thanks for the info ... what is the advantage of using the JSON FACET API >> compared to the standard BlockJoinQuery features? >> >> Is there already anybody working on the tagging/exclusion featu

Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

hould work. Let me know how does it, please. On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 5:35 PM, Stefan Moises wrote: > Hi Mikhail, > > thanks for the info ... what is the advantage of using the JSON FACET API > compared to the standard BlockJoinQuery features? > > Is there already anybody working o

Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

Hi Mikhail, thanks for the info ... what is the advantage of using the JSON FACET API compared to the standard BlockJoinQuery features? Is there already anybody working on the tagging/exclusion feature or is there any timeframe for it? There wasn't any discussion yet in SOLR-8998

Re: Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

e standard, which > is pretty cool. > When I tried to refactor our external code to use that now, I stumbled > upon one non-working feature with BlockJoins that still keeps us from using > it: > > It seems that tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Faceting simply > doe

Tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Queries and BlockJoin Faceting

is now part of the standard, which is pretty cool. When I tried to refactor our external code to use that now, I stumbled upon one non-working feature with BlockJoins that still keeps us from using it: It seems that tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Faceting simply does not work yet

Re: Solr UIMA Part Of Speech Tagging

standard template; hope this helps. -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-UIMA-Part-Of-Speech-Tagging-tp4215904p4216205.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Solr UIMA Part Of Speech Tagging

015, at 11:08 AM, techqnq wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I am working on part of speech tagging in solr using UIMA. > > I have integrated Solr and UIMA. I have indexed a document, below is the > > output: > > > > / > >1 > > &

Re: Solr UIMA Part Of Speech Tagging

i, > > I am working on part of speech tagging in solr using UIMA. > I have integrated Solr and UIMA. I have indexed a document, below is the > output: > > / >1 > > Human nature is not one thing > > > Human > nat

Solr UIMA Part Of Speech Tagging

Hi, I am working on part of speech tagging in solr using UIMA. I have integrated Solr and UIMA. I have indexed a document, below is the output: / 1 Human nature is not one thing Human nature is not one thing jj nn

Re: Error with CollapsingQParserPlugin when trying to use tagging

I've created the following tracker for the issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5416 -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Error-with-CollapsingQParserPlugin-when-trying-to-use-tagging-tp4098709p4098862.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing

Re: Error with CollapsingQParserPlugin when trying to use tagging

ing&facet.field={!ex=manufacturer_string}manufacturer_string&facet.field=HandleMaterial_string&facet.field=ValveType_string&facet.field=Theme_string&facet.field=MountingType_string&qt=/productQuery&qf=sku^9.0%20upc^9.1%20keywords_82_txtws^1.9%20uniqueid^9.0%20series^2.8%20pro

Error with CollapsingQParserPlugin when trying to use tagging

I ran into an error with the CollapsingQParserPlugin when trying to use it in tandem with tagging I get the following error whenever I use {!tag} in the same request as {!collapse field=groupid} Oct 31, 2013 6:43:56 PM org.apache.tomcat.util.http.Cookies processCookieHeader INFO: Cookies

Re: Error with CollapsingQParserPlugin when trying to use tagging

tring&qt=/productQuery&qf=sku^9.0%20upc^9.1%20keywords_82_txtws^1.9%20uniqueid^9.0%20series^2.8%20productTitle^1.2%20productid^9.0%20manufacturer^4.0%20masterFinish^1.5%20theme^1.1%20categoryNames_82_txt^0.2%20finish^1.4&pf=keywords_82_txtws^2.1%20productTitle^1.5%20manufacturer^4.0%

Re: Solr Result Tagging

Hi, Try using facet.query on each part, you will get the number of total hits for every OR. If you need this info per document, the answers might appear when specifying debug query=true.. If that info is useful, try adding "[explain]" to fl param (probably requires registering the augmenter plugin

Solr Result Tagging

Hi, My search queries to solr are of the following nature, (A OR B OR C) OR (X AND Y AND Z) OR ((ABC AND DEF) - XYZ) What I am trying to achieve is when I fire the query the results returned should be able to tagged with which part or the OR resulted in the result. In case all three parts above

Re: Tagging and Excluding Filters with date range facets

What's f.{!ex.? Do you mean fq={ex...? Best Erick On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Giorgi Jvaridze wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to use date range facet and I want to allow user to select several > facet values. > So I added date range facet with 'ex' LocalParam > .addDateRangeFacet("{!ex=moti

Tagging and indexing data for geospatial search

Hello. I have a crawler that sends documents to a Solr trunk instance via the ExtractingRequestHandler. I can search on title and content and everything is OK. The documents usually contain among others text like: - "...location: London, ..." or - "...in Brighton..." or - "...to Birmingham"

Re: document clustering or tagging

p;skin=fancy-compact&query=rugby+in+london&results=100&algorithm=lingo3g&EToolsDocumentSource.country=ALL&EToolsDocumentSource.language=ALL&EToolsDocumentSource.safeSearch=false > > > . Does this type of clustering results is also come under document tagging? >

Re: Tagging Facet Queries -- Urgent Help Required

gt;> query1.addFacetQuery("{!tag=NE key=BLOG}med:Blog AND slev:neutral"); >> and >> query2.addFilterQuery("{!tag=P}med:Review AND slev:neutral"); >> query2.addFacetQuery("{!tag=P key=Forum}med:Review AND slev:neutral"); >> >> I get correct results. >> {BLOG=98} and {Forum=830} respectively. >> >> I want to do this in a single query (with multiple facets). Is there some >> other way of tagging facet queries? >> >> Can any one help me with this? >> >> Regards, >> Ninad R >> > >

Re: Tagging Facet Queries -- Urgent Help Required

quot;); I get correct results. {BLOG=98} and {Forum=830} respectively. I want to do this in a single query (with multiple facets). Is there some other way of tagging facet queries? Can any one help me with this? Regards, Ninad R

Tagging Facet Queries -- Urgent Help Required

med:Blog AND slev:neutral"); and query2.addFilterQuery("{!tag=P}med:Review AND slev:neutral"); query2.addFacetQuery("{!tag=P key=Forum}med:Review AND slev:neutral"); I get correct results. {BLOG=98} and {Forum=830} respectively. I want to do this in a single query (with multi

Re: Tagging and excluding Filters

On 25.05.2010, at 08:55, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote: > Now when I deselect one of the checkboxes I add an fq parameters: > facet=true&fl=*,score&sort=score+desc&start=0&q=(tag_ids:("23"))&facet.field={!ex%3Ddt}organisation_id&facet.field={!ex%3Ddt}tag_ids&facet.field={!ex%3Ddt}addressee_ids&facet.fi

Tagging and excluding Filters

Hi, I am using the following solution: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#Tagging_and_excluding_Filters However when I implemented this on I found that I cannot combine different filter types: http://search.un-informed.org/search?q=&=&t[23]=malaria&tm=any&s=Search The above reque

Re: Tagging and searching on tagged indexes.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Rakhi Khatwani wrote: > Hi, > How do we tag solr indexes and search on those indexes, there is not > much information on wiki. all i could find is this: > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UserTagDesign > > has anyone tried it? (using solr API) > That page was crea

Tagging and searching on tagged indexes.

Hi, How do we tag solr indexes and search on those indexes, there is not much information on wiki. all i could find is this: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UserTagDesign has anyone tried it? (using solr API) One more question, can we change the schema dynamically at runtime? (while solr instan

Re: tagging application, best way to architect?

Thanks for the responses; I also found this useful thread from back in early '07: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/200702.mbox/browser (the "tagging" thread), and I might also start looking at facets as an approach. However, I'm assuming that facet up

Re: tagging application, best way to architect?

On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:36:01 +0530 "Noble Paul _ __" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2. We're assuming we'll have thousands of users with independent data; any > > good way to partition multiple indexes with solr? With Lucene we could > > just save those in ind

Re: tagging application, best way to architect?

s that I can't seem to get around however, and was > hoping for some advice. > > 1. We would like to do bulk tagging on large query result sets (ie, if you > have 1M emails, do a search, and then you wish to apply a tag to the result > set of, say, 250k results). I've tried man

tagging application, best way to architect?

We're trying to implement a large scale domain specific web email application, and so far solr performance on the search side is really doing well for us. There are two limitations that I can't seem to get around however, and was hoping for some advice. 1. We would like to do bulk

JSON tokenizer? tagging ideas

I've been struggling with how to get various bits of structured data into solr documents. In various projects I have tried various ideas, but none feel great. Take a simple example where I want a document field to be the list of linked data with name, ID, and path. I have tried things like:

Re: Tagging in solr

your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live > Spaces. It's easy! > http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Tagging-in-solr-tf4652183.html#a13390445 Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: Tagging in solr

> Subject: Re: Tagging in solr> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org> Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2007 12:47:18 +0200>> On Fri, 2007-10-19 at 11:01 +0100, Spas Poptchev wrote:>> Hi,>>>> what i want to do is to store tags that belong to products. Eac

Re: Tagging in solr

=> product1 was tagged 5 times with cool > > What would be the best way to implement this kind of stuff in solr? There is a wiki page on some brainstorming on how to implement tagging within Solr: <http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UserTagDesign> It's easy enough to have

Tagging in solr

Hi, what i want to do is to store tags that belong to products. Each tag should also store information about how often it was used with a certain product. So for example: product1 cool 5=> product1 was tagged 5 times with cool What would be the best way to implement this kind of stu

Re: Tagging using SOLR

er in Collex, a system I built: <http://www.nines.org/permalink/cloud/tag/nowviskie> Collex is using SOLR-139 now for tagging/annotating. You will need to think through handling updates to your documents, and whether you will have user-specific tags too. Reading up on the links

Re: Tagging using SOLR

, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Doss wrote: > > We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying > > to build > > a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called > > "tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperated by > > comma,

Re: Tagging using SOLR

On Sep 6, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Doss wrote: We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying to build a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called "tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperated by comma, please give suggestions on

Re: Tagging using SOLR

On Thu, 2007-09-06 at 12:59 +0530, Doss wrote: > Dear all, > > We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying to build > a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called > "tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperate

Tagging using SOLR

Dear all, We are running an appalication built using SOLR, now we are trying to build a tagging system using the existing SOLR indexed field called "tag_keywords", this field has different keywords seperated by comma, please give suggestions on how can we build tagging system using

Re: Tagging

On Feb 22, 2007, at 11:30 PM, Gmail Account wrote: I use solr for searching and facets and love it.. The performance is awesome. However I am about to add tagging to my application and I'm having a hard time deciding if I should just database my tags for now until a better solr sol

Re: Tagging

I use solr for searching and facets and love it.. The performance is awesome. However I am about to add tagging to my application and I'm having a hard time deciding if I should just database my tags for now until a better solr solution is worked out... Does anyone know what technology

Re: Tagging

For a more general solution, I'm thinking a separate lucene index might be ideal. -Yonik I dont know if this will work for others, below is what we do. Also, if there are things I can improve, do let me know. All tag inserts go to a small DB table. And I reindex the docs that these tags belon

Re: Tagging

: I explicitly asked on java-user once, "Hey, how does/can this thing : workblah blah", but got no responses. As far as I know, Chuck is : the only ParallelReader users. :) my understanding is that ParallelReader only makes sense if you truely are building both indexes in sync -- keeping the

Re: Tagging

- Search - Share - Original Message From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 12:49:08 AM Subject: Re: Tagging On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > Then you'd keep your big fields in one i

Re: Tagging

On Feb 15, 2007, at 2:55 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: Then you'd keep your big fields in one index, and the frequently modified and shorter fields in another index. But I never understood how you'd keep doc IDs in sync between the two, which is something that ParallelReader requires. I've

Re: Tagging

On 2/15/07, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: One way around this is to get support for ParallelReader (I believe ParallelWriter is still in JIRA, contributed by Chuck) into Solr. http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/api/org/apache/lucene/index/ParallelReader.html Then you'd keep your b

Re: Tagging

- Original Message From: Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 6:17:00 PM Subject: Re: Tagging On 2/13/07, Binkley, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still wonder if there's a good way of storing the tags outsid

Re: Tagging

On 2/13/07, Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I think it's the spaces at the ends of your lines that mess up most other clients trying to put the URL back together again. Yep, seems it's "delsp=yes" being used by Mail.app, but not being supported by other mail clients. http://www.macinto

Re: Tagging

On 2/14/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ...Sorry if I'm sending things mangled somehow - and if anyone has suggestions on correcting I'm all ears For long links I tend to use http://tinyurl.com/, but it's a bit painful to do that for all links. -Bertrand

Re: Tagging

On 2/13/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: >> And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff >> with Lucene and Solr already: > search/? >> search=raw&pageNumber=1&index=peelbib&field

Re: Tagging

On 2/13/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sorry if I'm sending things mangled somehow - and if anyone has suggestions on correcting I'm all ears. Unfortunately, no. There is some precedent for putting angle brackets around URLs in e- mails: this mechanism was documented in Tim Ber

Re: Tagging

re completely intact when viewing my own messages (and others with long links that are surrounded by ) in that same mailer (Mail.app on Mac OS X). *shrugs* Nabble thinks they're broken too: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Tagging-p8957261.html vs http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-question-about-synonym

Re: Tagging

ers with long links that are surrounded by ) in that same mailer (Mail.app on Mac OS X). *shrugs* Nabble thinks they're broken too: http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-Tagging-p8957261.html vs http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-question-about-synonyms-p8954457.html -Yonik

Re: Tagging

On Feb 13, 2007, at 9:01 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff with Lucene and Solr already: FYI, your mailer is alway

Re: Tagging

On 2/13/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There is also the possibility of keeping tags with the original documents and having them individually updated without having to resend the original full text as well: But it does require havin

Re: Tagging

There is also the possibility of keeping tags with the original documents and having them individually updated without having to resend the original full text as well: And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff with

Re: Tagging

On 2/13/07, Binkley, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I still wonder if there's a good way of storing the tags outside the Lucene index and using them via facets whose bitsets are manipulated directly rather than being populated from the index. In my project, reindexing a documents whenever a use

RE: Tagging

ebruary 12, 2007 7:07 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Tagging there no good solution yet. There has been discussion on possible approaches http://www.nabble.com/convert-custom-facets-to-Solr-facets...-tf3163183. html#a8790179 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UserTagDesign On 2/12

Re: Tagging

this topic before.. Is there a guidline on the best way to create tagging in solr? For example, keeping track of what user tagged what item in solr. And facetting based on tags? Thanks, Mike

Tagging

I know that I've seen this topic before.. Is there a guidline on the best way to create tagging in solr? For example, keeping track of what user tagged what item in solr. And facetting based on tags? Thanks, Mike