On 2/13/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is also the possibility of keeping tags with the original documents and having them individually updated without having to resend the original full text as well: <https://issues.apache.org/ jira/browse/SOLR-139>
But it does require having all original fields stored, and does re-analyze and re-index. Then there's the caching issue... you've changed the index and internal docids, and all the filters needed for efficient faceting need to be re-generated (document ones too, not just the tag related ones, since they are on the same documents). I do agree that tags-on-docs is desirable and simpler, if the performance is acceptable from both a re-indexing perspective, and a time-to-viewable perspective. The latter will probably be a bigger problem than the former unless you have a really popular site.
And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff with Lucene and Solr already: <http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/ search/? search=raw&pageNumber=1&index=peelbib&field=body&rawQuery=dog&digstatus= on>
FYI, your mailer is always breaking your links... I always have to cut-n-paste them back together again. -Yonik