On 2/13/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is also the possibility of keeping tags with the original
documents and having them individually updated without having to
resend the original full text as well: <https://issues.apache.org/
jira/browse/SOLR-139>

But it does require having all original fields stored, and does
re-analyze and re-index.
Then there's the caching issue... you've changed the index and
internal docids, and all the filters needed for efficient faceting
need to be re-generated (document ones too, not just the tag related
ones, since they are on the same documents).

I do agree that tags-on-docs is desirable and simpler, if the
performance is acceptable from both a re-indexing perspective, and a
time-to-viewable perspective.  The latter will probably be a bigger
problem than the former unless you have a really popular site.

And yeah, Peter is a solr4lib kinda guy, doing some way cool stuff
with Lucene and Solr already: <http://peel.library.ualberta.ca/
search/?
search=raw&pageNumber=1&index=peelbib&field=body&rawQuery=dog&digstatus=
on>

FYI, your mailer is always breaking your links... I always have to
cut-n-paste them back together again.

-Yonik

Reply via email to