Stefan,
child.facet.field never intend to support exclusions. My preference is to
implement it under json.facet that's discussed under
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8998.
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 3:52 PM, Stefan Moises <moi...@shoptimax.de> wrote:
> Hey girls and guys,
>
> for a long time we have been using our own BlockJoin Implementation,
> because for our Shop Systems a lot of requirements that we had were not
> implemented in solr.
>
> As we now had a deeper look into how far the standard has come, we saw
> that BlockJoin and faceting on children is now part of the standard, which
> is pretty cool.
> When I tried to refactor our external code to use that now, I stumbled
> upon one non-working feature with BlockJoins that still keeps us from using
> it:
>
> It seems that tagging and excluding Filters with BlockJoin Faceting simply
> does not work yet.
>
> Simple query:
>
> &qt=products
> &q={!parent which='isparent:true'}shirt AND isparent:false
> &facet=true
> &fq={!parent which='isparent:true'}{!tag=myTag}color:grey
> &child.facet.field={!ex=myTag}color
>
>
> Gives us:
> o.a.s.h.RequestHandlerBase org.apache.solr.common.SolrException:
> undefined field: "{!ex=myTag}color"
> at org.apache.solr.schema.IndexSchema.getField(IndexSchema.
> java:1231)
>
>
> Does somebody have an idea?
>
>
> Best,
> Stefan
>
> --
> --
> ************************************
> Stefan Moises
> Manager Research & Development
> shoptimax GmbH
> Ulmenstraße 52 H
> 90443 Nürnberg
> Tel.: 0911/25566-0
> Fax: 0911/25566-29
> moi...@shoptimax.de
> http://www.shoptimax.de
>
> Geschäftsführung: Friedrich Schreieck
> Ust.-IdNr.: DE 814340642
> Amtsgericht Nürnberg HRB 21703
> ************************************
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
