Hello,
we have solr 3.6.1 in our environment. we are trying to analyse
backup and recovery solutions for the same. is there a way to compress the
backup taken?
we have explored about replicationHandler with backup command. but as our
index is in 100's of GB's we would like a sol
3.6.1
Please let me know from where I need to download the correct jar file.
Regards,
I don't think you need to download anything. It's included in Solr 3.6.1
package.
$ ls contrib/langid/lib
jsonic-1.2.7.jar jsonic-NOTICE.txt langdetect-LICENSE-ASL.txt
jsonic-LICENSE-ASL.txt langdete
---
>
> From: Poornima Jay
> Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Language detection for solr 3.6.1
>
>
> When i try to use solr-langid-3.6.1.jar file in my path
> /apache-tomcat-5.5.25/webapps/solr_multilangue_3.6_jar/WEB-INF/lib/
> and define the path in the so
.
>
> Thanks,
> Poornima
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 8 July 2014 3:36 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
>
> From: Poornima Jay
> Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:03 PM
> Subject: Re: Language detection for solr 3.6.1
, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Poornima Jay
Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Language detection for solr 3.6.1
When i try to use solr-langid-3.6.1.jar file in my path
/apache-tomcat-5.5.25/webapps/solr_multilangue_3.6_jar/WEB-INF/lib
-- Forwarded message --
From: Poornima Jay
Date: Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: Language detection for solr 3.6.1
When i try to use solr-langid-3.6.1.jar file in my path
/apache-tomcat-5.5.25/webapps/solr_multilangue_3.6_jar/WEB-INF/lib/
and define the path in the
-detection/ in solr 3.6.1. I want four
languages (English, chinese simplified, chinese traditional, Japanes, and
Korean) to be added in one schema ie. multilingual search from single schema
file.
I tried added solr-langdetect-3.5.0.jar in my /solr/contrib/langid/lib/
location and in /webapps/solr/WEB
Hi,
Can anyone please let me know how to integrate
http://code.google.com/p/language-detection/ in solr 3.6.1. I want four
languages (English, chinese simplified, chinese traditional, Japanes, and
Korean) to be added in one schema ie. multilingual search from single schema
file.
I tried
uses faceting. I might try reducing
> the JVM
> >>>> memory some and amount of perm generation as suggested earlier.
> It feels
> >>>> like a GC issue and loading the cache just happens to be the
> victim of a
> >
ly sort. We provide classified ad
> >>>> searches and that heavily uses faceting. I might try reducing the JVM
> >>>> memory some and amount of perm generation as suggested earlier. It
> feels
> >>>> like a GC issue and loading the cache just happens to be th
y gut instinct is that your heap size is way too high. Try
>>>>> decreasing it to like 5-10G. I know you say it uses more than that,
>>>>> but that just seems bizarre unless you're doing something like
>>>>> faceting and/or sorting on ever
o perform a lot of sorting - on multiple fields in fact. We have
>>>>>> different kinds of Solr configurations - our news searches do little
>>>>>> with regards to faceting, but heavily sort. We provide classified ad
>>>>>> searches and that heavily uses faceti
From: Patrick O'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU and blocking on field cache
I've been tracking a problem in our Solr environment for awhile with
periodic stalls of S
ow you say it uses more than that,
> >>> but that just seems bizarre unless you're doing something like
> >>> faceting and/or sorting on every field.
> >>>
> >>> -Michael
> >>>
> >>> -Original Message-
> >>
er. It
>>>> feels
>>>> like a GC issue and loading the cache just happens to be the victim
>>>> of a
>>>> stop-the-world event at the worse possible time.
>>>>
>>>>> My gut instinct is that your heap size is way too high. Try
>&
r sorting on every field.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU and blocking on field cache
I've been tracking a problem in
t instinct is that your heap size is way too high. Try
>>> decreasing it to like 5-10G. I know you say it uses more than that,
>>> but that just seems bizarre unless you're doing something like
>>> faceting and/or sorting on every field.
>>>
>>> -Mic
seems bizarre
unless you're doing something like faceting and/or sorting on every field.
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU an
:59 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU and blocking on field cache
>
> I've been tracking a problem in our Solr environment for awhile with periodic
> stalls of Solr 3.6.1. I'm running up to a wall on ideas to try and thought I
>
'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 11:59 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU and blocking on field cache
I've been tracking a problem in our Solr environment for awhile with periodic
stalls of Solr 3.6.1. I'm run
snode Slovenia d.o.o.
-Original Message-
From: Patrick O'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU and blocking on field cache
I've been tracking a problem in our Solr environment fo
e-
From: Patrick O'Lone [mailto:pol...@townnews.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 5:59 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Solr 3.6.1 stalling with high CPU and blocking on field cache
I've been tracking a problem in our Solr environment for awhile with periodic
stalls of S
I've been tracking a problem in our Solr environment for awhile with
periodic stalls of Solr 3.6.1. I'm running up to a wall on ideas to try
and thought I might get some insight from some others on this list.
The load on the server is normally anywhere between 1-3. It's an 8-co
Did you mean that the product code and ISBN fields are of type
> text_Chinese?
>
> Is it first or second:
>
> or
> stored="false"/>
>
>
> What do you refer to when you tell that it's not working? Unable to search?
>
>
text_Chinese?
>
> Is it first or second:
>
> or
> stored="false"/>
>
>
> What do you refer to when you tell that it's not working? Unable to search?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Oct
, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Poornima Jay
wrote:
Hi,
>
>Did any one face a problem for chinese language in SOLR 3.6.1. Below is the
>analyzer in the schema.xml file.
>
>positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
hat do you refer to when you tell that it's not working? Unable to search?
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Poornima Jay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did any one face a problem for chinese language in SOLR 3.6.1. Below is
> the analyzer in the schema.xml file.
>
Hi,
Did any one face a problem for chinese language in SOLR 3.6.1. Below is the
analyzer in the schema.xml file.
It works fine with the chinese strings but not working with
Hi,
We had implemented Auto Complete feature in our site. Below are the solr config
details.
schema.xml
Query converter is a plugin if the app has special requirements.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Dyer, James
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 11:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers
That makes sense because the Query
: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers
Hi James,
Thanks for you reply. I got it worked and below was my old query.
http://localhost:8080/solr_3.6.1_spellcheck/test_spellcheck/spellcheck?q=8956632541&spellcheck=true
now I changed the
5415
Regards,
Poornima
From: "Dyer, James"
To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org"
Sent: Thursday, 25 July 2013 9:03 PM
Subject: RE: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers
I think the default SpellingQueryConverter has a hard time with ter
ntent Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Poornima Jay [mailto:poornima...@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 5:00 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Spell check SOLR 3.6.1 not working for numbers
Hi,
I using SOLR 3.6.1 and implemented spellcheck. I found that the numbers i
Hi,
I using SOLR 3.6.1 and implemented spellcheck. I found that the numbers in the
spellcheck query does not return any results. Below is my solrconfig.xml and
schema.xml details. Please any one let me know what needs to be done in order
to get the spell check for numbers.
solrConfig
Hi,
We are testing solr 4.3.0 in Tomcat (considering upgrading solr 3.6.1 to
4.3.0), we have
many cores (a few thousands).
We have noticed solr 4.3.0 memory usage is much higher than solr 3.6.1 (without
using
solr cloud yet). With 2K cores, solr 3.6.1 is using 1.5G, but solr 4.3.0 is
using
ncies in your requirements, we won't
> be able to make much progress.
>
>
> -- Jack Krupansky
>
> -Original Message- From: vsl
> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:45 AM
>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
>
>
sufficient.
But until you clarify the inconsistencies in your requirements, we won't be
able to make much progress.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 10:45 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
Thanks for your reply but this solution does not fullfil my requirment
because other documents (not exact matched) will be returned as well.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058929.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing
Hi Pawel,
If you are searching on any field of type "text_general" as defined in your
schema, you are stuck with the porter stemmer. In fact in your setting solr
is not aware of a term like "cats", but "cat". Thus no way to do exact
match with "cats" in this case.
What you can do is creating a new
Exact matching is just one of my cases. Currently I perform search on field
with given definition:
This field definition fullfils all other requirmen
e-
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
I will explain my case in the example below:
We have three documents with given content:
First document:
london cats glenvilet
Second document
london cat glenvilet le
I will explain my case in the example below:
We have three documents with given content:
First document:
london cats glenvilet
Second document
london cat glenvilet leeds
Third document
london cat glenvilet
Search term: "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
Expected result: First document
Current resu
I think in that case, making a field String type is your option, however
remember that it'd be case sensitive.
Another approach is to create a case insensitive field type and doing
searches on those fields only.
Can you provide your fie
you are trying
to solve some problem, you will need to clearly state your problem rather
than asking some general, abstract question.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 5:33 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Exact matching in Solr
Thanks for your reply. I am using edismax as well. What I want to get is the
exact match without other results that could be close to the given term.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058876.html
Sent from the Solr - User
Hi Pawel,
Not sure which parser you are using, I am using edismax and tried using the
bq parameter to boost the results having exact matches at the top.
You may try something like:
q="cats" AND London NOT Leeds&bq="cats"^50
In edismax, pf and pf2 parameters also need some tuning to get the result
Hi,
is it possible to get exact matched result if the search term is combined
e.g. "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
In the previus threads I have read that it is possible to create new field
of String type and perform phrase search on it but nowhere the above
mentioned combined search term had been t
> >> queries only require fields to be indexed but don't require them to be
> >> stored right?
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Petersen, Robert [mailto:robert.peter...@mail.rakuten.com]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:39 PM
>
I start doing this: function
>> queries only require fields to be indexed but don't require them to be
>> stored right?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Petersen, Robert [mailto:robert.peter...@mail.rakuten.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013
7;t require them to be
> stored right?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Petersen, Robert [mailto:robert.peter...@mail.rakuten.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 4:39 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
&g
PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
Good info, Thanks Hoss! I was going to add a more specific fl= parameter to my
queries at the same time. Currently I am doing fl=*,score so that will have to
be changed.
-Original Me
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 3.6.1: changing a field from stored to not stored
: index? I noticed I am unnecessarily storing some fields in my index and
: I'd like to stop storing them without having to 'reindex the world' and
: let the changes just naturally
: index? I noticed I am unnecessarily storing some fields in my index and
: I'd like to stop storing them without having to 'reindex the world' and
: let the changes just naturally percolate into my index as updates come
: in the normal course of things. Do you guys think I could get away wit
(13/04/24 7:09), Petersen, Robert wrote:
Hi guys,
What would happen if I changed a field definition on an existing field in an
existing index from stored to not stored? Would solr just party on ignoring
the fact that this field's data is stored in the current index? I noticed I am
unnecessa
ckson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 17, 2013 7:26 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr 3.6.1 ClassNotFound Exception
Hmmm, you shouldn't have to go looking for this, it should just be there.
My guess is that you have some kind of classpath issue.
If you h
#x27;ve changed your environment (perhaps inadvertently).
Best
Erick
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Zhang, Lisheng <
lisheng.zh...@broadvision.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is perhaps a trivial question but somehow I could not pin-down:
> when trying to index a fil
Have you just tried what you showed? It should work if I understand the
question. If it doesn't work, please show us the query in, the response
out, and what is NOT as you expect.
Best
Erick
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:20 AM, xpow wrote:
> please help ...
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in contex
Hi,
This is perhaps a trivial question but somehow I could not pin-down:
when trying to index a file (using solr 3.6.1) I got the error:
Caused by: org.apache.solr.common.SolrException: Error loading class
'solr.extraction.ExtractingRequestHandler'
I know in solrconfig.xml we ha
please help ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-and-facet-query-regular-expression-tp4047628p4047947.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
"2013-03-04",1,
"2013-03-05",3,
"2013-03-11",3,
"2013-03-15",63]},
"facet_dates":{},
"facet_ranges":{}},
"highlighting":{
"http://www.abbc.go.id/1":{
"exactText":["content 1"]},
"http://www.abbc.go.id/2":{
"exactText":["content 2"]},
"http://www.defg.go.id/3":{
"exactText":["content 3"]}}}
My end goal would be to query based on content of exactText but within a
subset of a id field, for example:
- the keyword is "content"
- the regular expression that is applied to id is "http://www.abbc.go.id/*";
- there will be 2 results:
==> 1) http://www.abbc.go.id/1
==> 2) http://www.abbc.go.id/2
- the query would be q=exactText:(content)&fq=id:"http://www.abbc.go.id/*";
So my question: is it possible to query this using solr 3.6.1??
Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-and-facet-query-regular-expression-tp4047628.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
:08 AM, Mark Wilson wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am using Nutch to crawl a site, and post it in Solr 3.6.1. The page is
>> very large.
>>
>> When I query the index, using the Solr Admin query page, it only finds the
>> result if it is in the top X% of
: Subject: Solr 3.6.1 Query large field
: In-Reply-To:
https://people.apache.org/~hossman/#threadhijack
Thread Hijacking on Mailing Lists
When starting a new discussion on a mailing list, please do not reply to
an existing message, instead start a fresh email. Even if you change the
subject
, and post it in Solr 3.6.1. The page is
> very large.
>
> When I query the index, using the Solr Admin query page, it only finds the
> result if it is in the top X% of the page, probably about 30%.
>
> The page is about 79Kb, and consists of 19,067 words.
>
> Is th
Hi
I am using Nutch to crawl a site, and post it in Solr 3.6.1. The page is
very large.
When I query the index, using the Solr Admin query page, it only finds the
result if it is in the top X% of the page, probably about 30%.
The page is about 79Kb, and consists of 19,067 words.
Is there a
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 7:01 AM, Sujatha Arun wrote:
> 1) Added the properties as name value pairs in the solr.xml - *But these
> values are lost on Server Restart*
This is how you do it in my experience. Just make sure
persistent="true" is set, and don't edit the file while the server is
runnin
We have a multicore setup with more that 200 cores . Some of the cores have
different schema based on the search type /language.
While trying to migrate to Master /Slave set up.
I see that we can specify the Master /Slave properties in
solrcore.properties file . However does this have to done at
Can someone tell me if Solr 3.6.1 supports XML 1.1 or must I stick with XML 1.0?
Thanks!
-MJ
-2013 19:25
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: solr 3.6.1 Indexing and utf8 issue
>
> Thanks for the pointer , but given the same index code ,why does this not
> work in solr 3.6.1 but wors fine in solr 1.3
>
> Any idea?
>
> Regards
> Sujatha
>
>
Thanks for the pointer , but given the same index code ,why does this not
work in solr 3.6.1 but wors fine in solr 1.3
Any idea?
Regards
Sujatha
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You've likely got some non-character code points in your data and the
ges.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1016
Cheers,
-Original message-
> From:Sujatha Arun
> Sent: Tue 22-Jan-2013 12:35
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: solr 3.6.1 Indexing and utf8 issue
>
> Hi,
>
> We are on solr 3.6.1 on Tomcat 5.5.2
Hi,
We are on solr 3.6.1 on Tomcat 5.5.25 . The Indexing of polish content
throws the following error .
*Caused by: com.ctc.wstx.exc.WstxIOException: Invalid UTF-8 middle byte
0x77 (at char #166, byte #127)*
at com.ctc.wstx.sr.StreamScanner.throwFromIOE(StreamScanner.java:708)
at
"
André
Von: mechravi25 [mechrav...@yahoo.co.in]
Gesendet: Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 11:10
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: ConcurrentModificationException in Solr 3.6.1
On 18 January 2013 12:01, mechravi25 wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I am using Solr 3.6.1 vers
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version. I am giving a set of requests to solr
simultaneously. When I check the log file, I noticed the below exception
stack trace
SEVERE: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.checkForComodification(LinkedList.java:761)
at
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version and have both master and slave instance.
I noticed that whenever I make some configuration changes and then restart
the server(both master and slave instance)
to replicate the changed index(after indexing in master) to slave.
When I perform the replication
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version and have both master and slave instance.
I noticed that whenever I make some configuration changes and then restart
the server(both master and slave instance)
to replicate the changed index(after indexing in master) to slave.
When I perform the replication
: Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 11:10
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: ConcurrentModificationException in Solr 3.6.1
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version. I am giving a set of requests to solr
simultaneously. When I check the log file, I noticed the below exception
stack t
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version. I am giving a set of requests to solr
simultaneously. When I check the log file, I noticed the below exception
stack trace
SEVERE: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.checkForComodification(LinkedList.java:761)
at
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version. I am giving a set of requests to solr
simultaneously. When I check the log file, I noticed the below exception
stack trace
SEVERE: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at
java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.checkForComodification(LinkedList.java
Hi all,
I am using Solr 3.6.1 version. I am giving a set of requests to solr
simultaneously. When I check the log file, I noticed the below exception
stack trace
SEVERE: java.util.ConcurrentModificationException
at
java.util.LinkedList$ListItr.checkForComodification(LinkedList.java
erver to provide high level objects encapsulating the response and
> response content.
>
> Greetings!
>
> - Mensaje original -
> De: "Upayavira"
> Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Enviados: Sábado, 5 de Enero 2013 4:49:01
> Asunto: Re: Migrating from So
to provide high level objects
encapsulating the response and response content.
Greetings!
- Mensaje original -
De: "Upayavira"
Para: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Enviados: Sábado, 5 de Enero 2013 4:49:01
Asunto: Re: Migrating from Solr 3.6.1 to Solr 4
Try pointing your app at
AM, Jorge Luis Betancourt Gonzalez wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I'm currently working with solr 3.6.1, but solr 4 has great features like
> the ones bundled with SolrCloud, the content in the index is really not
> the problem to the transition, the thing is that I've a large app written
Hi:
I'm currently working with solr 3.6.1, but solr 4 has great features like the
ones bundled with SolrCloud, the content in the index is really not the problem
to the transition, the thing is that I've a large app written in PHP + Solarium
that interacts with the index in solr 3. A
thanks for the respond, i will try it and report back ...
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-3-6-1-tp4028502p4028675.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The default operator is OR. And the default field is 'text'. So when
So what you did this query:
q=exactText:"how+about" AND content:tomorrow+morning
what you did was:
Find all documents that:
have the terms 'how' and 'about' next to each other in the exactText
field
AND
have the term
Hi,
I have a case where i need to find the results of a query that search for a
exact phrase + other words, for example, if i have a keyword like:
"how about" tomorrow morning
the results that should be fetched should match these criteria:
- containing exact phrase how about <= exactly how about
erick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2012 7:38 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with Solr 3.6.1 extracting ODT content using SolrCell's
ExtractingRequestHandler
Not an issue that I know of. I expect you've got some obscure problem in your
definitions, b
: I'm sorry, I don't see how the resource loader awareness is relevant to
: schema awareness? Or perhaps you didn't imply that? Good to know about the
No, my mistake ... typed one when i ment the other one.
: I guess I use the core to get to the schema then. Hmm, I may recall trying
: that at so
I'm sorry, I don't see how the resource loader awareness is relevant to
schema awareness? Or perhaps you didn't imply that? Good to know about the
resource loader though. Although I'm not sure what the resource loader does
at this point (but that's a side track).
I guess I use the core to get to t
: So I'm creating a request handler plugin where I want to fetch some values
: from the schema. I make it SchemaAware but the inform method is never
: called. I assume that there is some way of registering the instance as
: aware (and I have seen and used this before, although that information
: e
So I'm creating a request handler plugin where I want to fetch some values
from the schema. I make it SchemaAware but the inform method is never
called. I assume that there is some way of registering the instance as
aware (and I have seen and used this before, although that information
escapes me a
> 2009-04-16T11:32:00
>
>
> 2012-11-23T00:29:39.73
>
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
> Brett.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:27 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
...
Brett.
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 9:27 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Problem with Solr 3.6.1 extracting ODT content using SolrCell's
ExtractingRequestHandler
Did you commit after you adde
Did you commit after you added the document but before you tried the search?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Brett Melbourne <
bmelbou...@halogensoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am encountering a problem where Solr 3.6.1 is not able to extract the
> text cont
Hi all,
I am encountering a problem where Solr 3.6.1 is not able to extract the text
content from ODT (Open Office Document) files submitted to the
ExtractingRequestHandler. I can reproduce this issue against the example schema
running with jetty.
Executing a simple index request (based on
François Schiettecatte
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:38 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Is leading wildcard search turned on by default in Solr 3.6.1?
>
>
> John
>
> You can still use leading wildcards even if you dont have the
> ReversedWildcar
.
Technology advances. We should permit our mindsets to advance as well.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: François Schiettecatte
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 2:38 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Is leading wildcard search turned on by default in Solr 3.6.1?
John
You
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:27 AM, wrote:
> I'm surprised that this has not been logged as adefect. The fact that this
> is ON bydefault, means someone can bring down a server; this is bad enough to
> categorizethis as a security issue.
It's all relative. There are tons of queries that can tak
onday, November 12, 2012 8:10 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is leading wildcard search turned on by default in Solr 3.6.1?
Yeah, thesituation is kind of a pain right now. In
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2438, it was enabled by default and
there is noway to disable wi
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 7:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Is leading wildcard search turned on by default in Solr 3.6.1?
At one point, in some version of Solr, it was OFF by default, and you had to
enable it via a setting (either in solrconfig.xml or schema.xml, I don
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
