It sounds as if your field type is doing stemming - mapping "cats" to "cat".
That is a valuable feature of search, but if you wish to turn it off... go
ahead and do so by editing the field type. But just be aware that turning
off stemming is a great loss of search flexibility.
Who knows, maybe you might want to have both stemmed and unstemmed fields in
an edismax query and give a higher boost to the unstemmed field - but it's
not up to us to guess your requirements. We're dependent on you clearly
expressing your requirements.
As indicated before, you, the developer have complete control here. But...
it is up to you, the developer to choose wisely, to suit your application
requirements. But if you don't describe your requirements with greater
precision and detail, we won't be able to be of much help to you.
Your second (only two????) requirement relates to spellcheck, which is
completely unrelated to query matching and exactness. Yes, Solr has a
spellcheck capability, and yes, it does collation. Is that all you are
asking? If there is a specific issue, please be specific about it.
-- Jack Krupansky
-----Original Message-----
From: vsl
Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Exact matching in Solr 3.6.1
I will explain my case in the example below:
We have three documents with given content:
First document:
london cats glenvilet
Second document
london cat glenvilet leeds
Third document
london cat glenvilet
Search term: "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
Expected result: First document
Current result: First document, Third document
Additionaly, next requirement says that when I type as search term: "cats"
AND Londo NOT Leeds
then I should get spell check collation: "cats" AND London NOT Leeds
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058890.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
