Hi Pawel, If you are searching on any field of type "text_general" as defined in your schema, you are stuck with the porter stemmer. In fact in your setting solr is not aware of a term like "cats", but "cat". Thus no way to do exact match with "cats" in this case. What you can do is creating a new type of field and with the copyField facility save a verbatim version of your data in that field while the field of type "text-general" still performs stemming. Finally, do add the new field to the list of searcheable field with a higher boost so that exact match receives highest score. Hope this helps. regards,
Maj On 25 April 2013 14:43, vsl <ociepa.pa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exact matching is just one of my cases. Currently I perform search on > field > with given definition: > > <fieldType name="text_general" class="solr.TextField" > positionIncrementGap="100"> > <analyzer type="index"> > <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" > generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" > catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" > splitOnCaseChange="1" preserveOriginal="1" types="characters.txt"/> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" > words="stopwords.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/> > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory" > language="English"/> > </analyzer> > <analyzer type="query"> > <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" > generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" > catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1" catenateAll="0" > splitOnCaseChange="1" preserveOriginal="1" types="characters.txt"/> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.StopFilterFactory" ignoreCase="true" > words="stopwords.txt" enablePositionIncrements="true"/> > <filter class="solr.SynonymFilterFactory" synonyms="synonyms.txt" > ignoreCase="true" expand="true"/> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > <filter class="solr.SnowballPorterFilterFactory" > language="English"/> > > </analyzer> > </fieldType> > > This field definition fullfils all other requirments. > Examples: > - special characters > - passengers<-> passenger > > The case with exact matching is the last one I have to complete. > > The problem with cats <-> cat is caused by SnowballPorterFilterFactory. > This > is what I know. > > The question is whether it is possible to handle exact matching (edismax) > with only one result like described in the previous post without > influencing > existing functionalities? > > BR > Pawel > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Exact-matching-in-Solr-3-6-1-tp4058865p4058907.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
