That’s a good place to start. The idea was to make sure titles that started
with a date would not always be at the forefront and the actual title of the
doc would be sorted.
> On Jul 15, 2020, at 4:58 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> Yeah, it’s always a question “how much is enough/too much”.
>
Yeah, it’s always a question “how much is enough/too much”.
That looks reasonable for alphatitle, but what about title? Your original
question was that the sorting changes depending on which field you
sort on. If your title field uses something that tokenizes or doesn’t
include the same analysis
thanks, ill check the admin, didnt want to send a big clock of text but:
-
-
Tokenizer:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.core.KeywordTokenizerFactoryclass:
solr.KeywordTokenizerFactoryluceneMatchVersion: 7.1.0
-
Token Filters:
org.apache.lucene.analysis.co
I’d look two places:
1> try the admin/analysis page from the admin UI. In particular, look at what
tokens actually get in the index.
2> again, the admin UI will let you choose the field (alphatitle and title) and
see what the actual indexed tokens are.
Both have the issue that I don’t know wha
p://aka.ms/weboutlook>
From: vishal patel
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:33 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sorting in other collection in Solr 8.5.1
My listing looks like :
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Pw94topEJfarEA_P5JeiDOsHlvyACPK0/view
ID
ot;project_id":"102579"
}
As of now one form has only one action but possible one form has many actions.
For getting listing of project_id:102578, First we sort in ascending in
actionscomments with field title so we get form_id in order 10252141 and
10252140.
Base on that ord
You have two separate collections with dissimilar data, so what
does “sorting them in the same order” mean? Your example
sorts on title, so why can’t you sort them both on title? That won’t
work of course for any field that isn’t identical in both
collections.
These are actually pretty small colle
Hi Vishal,
Maybe you can post your query that you are using which has the issue too.
Regards,
Edwin
On Sat, 23 May 2020 at 22:27, vishal patel
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am upgrading Solr 8.5.1. I have created 2 shards and each has one
> replica.
> I have created 2 collection one is form and second is
Hi Folks,
Has anyone had a chance to consider this question yet?
Thanks!
Stephen
On Tue, Mar 3, 2020 at 2:28 PM Stephen Lewis Bianamara <
stephen.bianam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi SOLR Community,
>
> I've observed while hosting a SOLR 6.6 installation that if I issue a
> query where the filter q
Hi Erick,
I am using json facets and was able to achieve desired result using them. I
was looking for some possibilities for same in groups.
Doing it using json facets is last option.
Thank
Saurabh Sharma
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020, 7:17 PM Erick Erickson
wrote:
> This might help:
> https://lucene
This might help: https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_4/json-facet-api.html
basically, if you can construct facets that correspond to your groups, you can
do some statistical functions on them.
Best,
Erick
> On Jan 13, 2020, at 2:18 AM, Saurabh Sharma
> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have a requ
Thank you Shawn for your prompt response.
However we have that option open of having a separate date only field or a
separate field with date along with default Timestamp like you mentioned
(00:00:00.000). But this change shall need a full-import or full crawl, as
we lot many data, we looking o
Thank you Shawn for your prompt response.
However we have that option open of having a separate date only field or a
separate field with date along with default Timestamp like you mentioned
(00:00:00.000). But this change shall need a full-import or full crawl, as
we lot many data, we looking out a
On 7/10/2019 7:22 AM, Santosh Kumar S wrote:
When we try sorting it, then the records are getting sorted based on
Timestamp, but we need to sort only on date part keeping timestamp part
aside.
That is how sorting on a field that has a timestamp is going to work.
It will always use the whole fi
Chris:
Please follow the instructions here:
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html#mailing-lists-irc. You
must use the _exact_ same e-mail as you used to subscribe.
If the initial try doesn't work and following the suggestions at the
"problems" link doesn't work for you, let us know. But no
UNSUBSCRIBE
On Tue, 30 Oct 2018 at 8:24 pm, Stefan Kuhn wrote:
> Hi,
>
> last week I found an error in the result sorting regarding a field of the
> type "solr.CurrencyFieldType" in solr version 7.3.1.
>
> There are multiple documents which I must sort with this field, but the
> order of the res
On 9/14/2018 4:50 AM, richard.clarke wrote:
What does it mean to sort documents by a multivalued field? If a field has
multiple values, how can this be used to sort documents?
e.g. if document 1 has a numeric field containing values 1,2,3,4,5 and
document 2 has values in the same field of 1,2,3
http://people.apache.org/~mkhl/searchable-solr-guide-7-3/common-query-parameters.html#sort-parameter
In the case of primitive fields, or SortableTextFields, that are
multiValued="true" the representative value used for each doc when sorting
depends on the sort direction: The minimum value in each d
Use a enum field. Those are designed to map arbitrary values to a sort order.
The standard example is to apply an order to something that isn’t alpha like:
Error, Warning, Info.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/working-with-enum-fields.html
Enums convert an ordered set into a numeric sort
On 9/1/2018 12:36 AM, Salvo Bonanno wrote:
I need to sort a results set in a particolar way... the documents
looks like this:
There are two problems with what you want and your setup.
I need to sort them by profile_txt value (it's a multiValue field but
actually it contains just a single valu
Just tried this on master and can't reproduce.
Didn't try 5.4.
Any chance this is a multiValued field? That can sometimes confuse things.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 2:50 AM, Vijay Tiwary wrote:
> Hello Erick
>
> We are using string field and data is stored in lower case while indexing
Hello Erick
We are using string field and data is stored in lower case while indexing.
We have alias set up to query multiple collections simultaneously.
alias=collection1, collection2
If we are querying through alias then sorting is broken. For e.g. Results
for descending sort are as follows. (Em
Looking carefully at the documentation for JSON facets, it looks as though
the offset parameter is not supported for range facets, only for term
facets. You'd have to do pagination in your application.
-Simon
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Anil wrote:
> HI Eric,
>
> i mean pagination is off
HI Eric,
i mean pagination is offset and limit for facet results. Basically i am
trying to sort the daily totals (from json facet field) and apply offset,
limit to the buckets.
json.facet=
{
daily_totals: {
type: range,
field: daily_window,
start : "2017-11-01T00:00:00
What exactly do you mean by "pagination" here? Facets are computed over
the entire result set. That is, if the number of documents found for the query
is 1,000,000, the facets are returned counted over all 1M docs, even if your
rows parameter is 10. The same numbers will be returned for facets
rega
What _is_ your expectation? You haven't provided any examples of what
your input and expectations _are_.
You might review: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
string types are case-sensitive for instance, so that's one thing that
could be happening. You
can also specify sortMissingFirs
Hello Eric,
title is a string field
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, 9:21 pm Erick Erickson,
wrote:
> what kind of field is title? text_general or something? Sorting on a
> tokenized field is usually something you don't want to do. If a field
> has aardvard and zebra, how would it sort?
>
> There's usually
what kind of field is title? text_general or something? Sorting on a
tokenized field is usually something you don't want to do. If a field
has aardvard and zebra, how would it sort?
There's usually something like alphaOnlySort. People often copyField
from "title" to "title_sort" and search on "tit
sorry, I mean to an ip adress as a numeric value, example in MySQL:
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/miscellaneous-functions.html#function_inet-aton
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:35 PM, root23 wrote:
> I am sorry i am not sure what you mean by store as atom. Is that an
> fieldType
> in solr
I am sorry i am not sure what you mean by store as atom. Is that an fieldType
in solr ?
I couldnt find it in here
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/field-types-included-with-solr.html
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Store it as an atom rather than an up address.
> On Jun 18, 2018, at 12:14 PM, root23 wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> is there a built in data type which i can use for ip address which can
> provide me sorting ip address based on the class? if not then what is the
> best way to sort based on ip address ?
Thanks, Mikhail
On 2018/05/18 11:33:09, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Right
> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#ValueSourceParser
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:04 AM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
> prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Mikhail,
> >
> > I think you forgot to link
Right
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins#ValueSourceParser
On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:04 AM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> I think you forgot to link the reference.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Regards,
> Prateek
>
> On 2018/05/17 13:18:22, Mikha
Hi Mikhail,
I think you forgot to link the reference.
Thanks
Regards,
Prateek
On 2018/05/17 13:18:22, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
> Here is the reference I've found so far.
>
> On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:26 PM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
> prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > H
Here is the reference I've found so far.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:26 PM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Mikhail,
>
> > You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value
> > source parser.
>
> But like my requirement for this wa
Hi Mikhail,
> You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value
> source parser.
But like my requirement for this was to add a field dynamically from cache or
external source to the returned documents from the solr and perform sorting in
the solr itself if required otherw
Prateek,
It's too late to sort on transformer result.
You can either sort by function that needs to turn the logic into value
source parser.
If you need to toss just result page, check rerank.
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 10:03 AM, prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com <
prateek.agar...@bigbasket.com> wrote:
Hi Christopher,
if you model your documents with a nested document approach ( like the one
you mentioned) you should be able to achieve your requirement following
this interesting blog [1] :
*" ToParentBlockJoinQuery supports several score calculation modes. For
example, a score for a parent cou
Hey David,
Thanks for your suggestions! I think I’ve got the right behaviour now; I’ve
done fq={!parent which=is_parent:true score=total v='+is_parent:false
+{!func}density'} desc instead of sort=…
Side note: the grid cells can be POLYGON or MULTIPOLYGON, so BBoxField didn’t
work when I tried
quote: "The problem is that this includes children that DON’T touch the
search area in the sum. How can I only include the shapes from the first
query above in my sort?"
Unless I'm misunderstanding your intent, I think this is a simple matter of
adding the spatial filter to the parent join query y
Hello All,
any updates on my post.
It's too much urget.
Thanks
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
Hi,
our strategy is to have a separate center coordinate field that we use
for sorting. This has the additional benefit that it's possible to have
the indexed center point differ from the polygon's centroid, which can
be useful e.g. with cities, where the city center can be quite a bit
offset
Hello,
Sorry for the belated response.
Solr only supports sorting from point or rectangles in the index. For
rectangles use BBoxField. For points, ideally use the new
LatLonPointSpatialField; failing that use LatLonType. You can use RPT for
point data but I don't recommend sorting with it; use
I found the option `comparatorClass`.
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#Custom_Comparators_and_the_Lucene_Spell_Checkers_.28IndexBasedSpellChecker.2C_FileBasedSpellChecker.2C_DirectSolrSpellChecker.29
If I want to sort suggested words alphabetically, need to set a custom
comparator
Hi there.
I have found a possible solution for this issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/sorting-by-date-not-working-on-dates-earlier-than-EPOCH-tp4303456p4305770.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
@Rohit you can look into this.
http://www.javaworld.com/article/2074996/hashcode-and-equals-method-in-java-object---a-pragmatic-concept.html
A good article for hashcode and equals
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-Problem-with-custom-ValueSourceParser
I tried returning false in equals method but still it has no effect.
Btw is there any documentation where i can look at what the functions are
used for. I can't find any proper documentation related to it. It is very
difficult to guess the usage of the functions.
I don't think it will be a good i
Hi Hoss,
Thanks for the response. Will make the necessary changes and get back to
you.
Btw this is just a testing code. The logic is yet to be implemented. What
according to you could be the best way to return hashcode?
Regards,
Rohit
On Oct 5, 2016 5:27 AM, "Chris Hostetter" wrote:
>
> : Eg:
: Eg: if i make a query to sort by func(cost) desc
: It works.
: Now if i change cost with some another field eg func(rating) desc
: It sorts the result by cost only.
:
: Now if i restart the solr server and call sort by func(rating) it works but
: now it will stick with rating
:
: Any idea why
Hi Alex,
DateRangeField extends some spatial stuff, which has that error message in
it, not in DateRangeField proper. You cannot sort on a DateRangeField. If
you want to... try adding either one plain docValues field if you just have
date instances, or a pair of them to hold a min & max and pick
Ugh... Never used this approach and was thinking that sort can take a
function that returns string, but it requires function that returns
double so you would need to provide function that returns double
representation of string. With such function you could do:
sort=if(exists(object_name_fr),
Thank you Emir. That was helpful.
I understand that we can make sure all doc have values in all fields at
indexing time. But if that's not possible, how can we make sure all docs
have values in all fields query time?
If we missed to provide value for certain fields at index time, how can we
ensure
Hi Vasu,
It is expected behavior, and you can control it with sortMissingLast and
sortMissingFirst. Here is comment from schema:
In any case it does not seem right to me to have results first just
because it is declared as French - in some cases it will be same as
English version and will
Thank you Ahmet.
I have couple of questions on using CollationKeyAnalyzer:
1) Is it enough to specify this Analyzer in schema.xml as shown below or do
i need to pass any parameters like language etc.?
2) Do we need to define one CollationKeyAnalyzer per language?
3) I also noticed that there is o
Hi,
I think there is a dedidated fieldType for this:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Language+Analysis#LanguageAnalysis-UnicodeCollation
Ahmet
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 9:08 PM, Vasu Y wrote:
Thank you Ahmet.
I have couple of questions on using CollationKeyAnalyzer:
1) I
Hi Vasu,
There is a field type or something like that (CollationKeyAnalyzer) for
language specific sorting.
Ahmet
On Thursday, August 25, 2016 12:29 PM, Vasu Y wrote:
Hi,
I have a text field which can contain values (multiple tokens) in English;
to support sorting, I had in schema.xml to co
Well, since the ascii upper-case codes are smaller than lower case,
i.e.
A = 0x41
a = 0x61
upper case before lower case is correct IMO.
But you're being fooled by the I "tiebreaker" I'd guess,
along with (I suppose) a small number of test docs. When
two docs have the same sort value, the internal
I'm going to be a bit pedantic here since
"before" and "after" are a little misleading. Perhaps
"during" is better.
What happens internally is that a list "rows" long
is kept (i..e the &rows=### parameter). Let's say
&rows=20. A list to hold 20 items is created. The
first 20 docs are just put in t
Naveen,
The documents are sorted before. Lets say if it was a post sort and you are
fetching 10 rows it would have pulled up top 10 rows and sorted it. but
that is not what happens in solr it sorts in all available docs as per the
query and goves the number of rows as per your requirment.
Regards
Hi Naveen,
I am not too sure what you're after but the sorting mechanism is applied
after search results are fetched.
>From Solr Ref Guide:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-ThesortParameter
The sort parameter *arranges search results*
Thanks Alex, I will check this out.
Is it possible to do something at query time , using a function query to
lowercase the field and then sort on it.?
Jay
> On Jun 24, 2016, at 12:03 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
> wrote:
>
> Keep voting for SOLR-8362?
>
> You could do your preprocessing in Upda
Keep voting for SOLR-8362?
You could do your preprocessing in UpdateRequestProcessor chain. There
is nothing specifically for Lower/Upper case, but there is a generic
scripting one:
http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/solr/update/processor/StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactor
Any ideas on how to handle case insensitive search, string fields and
docvalues in 1 field?
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
> At least you don't need to store the sort field. Or even index, if it is
> docvalues (good for sort).
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 24 Jun 20
At least you don't need to store the sort field. Or even index, if it is
docvalues (good for sort).
Regards,
Alex
On 24 Jun 2016 9:01 AM, "Jay Potharaju" wrote:
> yes, that is what i thought. but was checking to see if there was something
> I was missing.
> Thanks
>
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at
yes, that is what i thought. but was checking to see if there was something
I was missing.
Thanks
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Ahmet Arslan
wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> I don't think it can be combined.
> Mainly because: searching requires a tokenized field.
> Sorting requires a single value (token
Hi Jay,
I don't think it can be combined.
Mainly because: searching requires a tokenized field.
Sorting requires a single value (token) to be meaningful.
Ahmet
On Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:43 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
Hi,
I would like to have 1 field that can used for both searching and case
i
Thanks Mikhail!
I will check and get back.
Best,
Mark
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Mikhail Khludnev <
mkhlud...@griddynamics.com> wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> Is it sounds like what's described at
>
> http://blog-archive.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
> ?
>
> On Tue,
Hello Mark,
Is it sounds like what's described at
http://blog-archive.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:41 PM, Mark Robinson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement to sort records in one core/ collection based on a
> field in
> another core/c
Thanks for the reply Eric!
Can we write a custom sort component to achieve this?...
I am thinking of normalizing as the last option as clear separation of the
cores helps me.
Thanks!
Mark.
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Join doesn't work like that, which is why it's
Join doesn't work like that, which is why it's referred
to as "pseudo join". There's no way that I know of
to do what you want here.
I'd strongly recommend you flatten your data at index time.
Best,
Erick
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Mark Robinson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a requirement to so
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks. Missed it completely thought it would handle by
default.
On Monday 23 May 2016 02:08 PM, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-ThesortParameter
sort=score asc
On Mon, May 23,
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Common+Query+Parameters#CommonQueryParameters-ThesortParameter
sort=score asc
On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Pranaya Behera
wrote:
> Hi Mikhail,
> I saw the blog post tried to do that with parent block
> query {!parent} as I d
Hi Mikhail,
I saw the blog post tried to do that with parent block
query {!parent} as I dont have the reference for the parent in the child
to use in the {!join}. This is my result.
https://gist.github.com/shadow-fox/b728683b27a2f39d1b5e1aac54b7a8fb .
This yields me the result
Thanks for your reply.
But it didn't work when I execute this query.
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/mlt?q=testing&sort=creation_date
desc,id asc&rows=10
This is my configuration for the handler.
explicit 10
json true
edismax id, score content subject content 2 5 3 25 10 false details
Hello,
Check this
http://blog-archive.griddynamics.com/2015/08/scoring-join-party-in-solr-53.html
Let me know if you need further comments.
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Pranaya Behera
wrote:
> Example would be:
> Lets say that I have a product document with regular fields as name,
> price,
Adding lucene user mailing list to it.
On Thursday 19 May 2016 06:55 PM, Pranaya Behera wrote:
Example would be:
Lets say that I have a product document with regular fields as name,
price, desc, is_parent. it has child documents such as
CA:: fields as a,b,c,rank
and another child document as
Example would be:
Lets say that I have a product document with regular fields as name,
price, desc, is_parent. it has child documents such as
CA:: fields as a,b,c,rank
and another child document as
CB:: fields as x,y,z.
I am using the query where {!parent which="is_parent:true"}a:some AND
b:so
While searching in the lucene code base I found
/ToParentBlockJoinSortField /but its not in the solr or even in solrj as
well. How would I use it with solrj as I can't find anything to query it
through the UI.
On Thursday 19 May 2016 11:29 AM, Pranaya Behera wrote:
Hi,
How can I sort th
using the more like this query parser should solve your problem !
Just use that query parser and than sort as usual.
Cheers
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:53 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would like to check, is there a function to do the sorting for MLT results
> in Solr? I understand th
Thanks for sharing the solution Tamas -- I was hoping you'd let us know...
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Tamás Barta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI: the final solution I found is that I created a custom
> "listpos(fieldName, listId)" function and now I can display a sorted list
> via:
>
> fq=listid_s:37
Hi,
FYI: the final solution I found is that I created a custom
"listpos(fieldName, listId)" function and now I can display a sorted list
via:
fq=listid_s:378
sort=listpos(listpos_s,378) asc
Regards,
Tamas
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:55 PM, John Bickerstaff
wrote:
> Tamas,
>
> This feels a bit li
Tamas,
This feels a bit like a "user favorites" problem.
I did a little searching and found this... Don't know if it will help, but
when I'm looking for stuff like this I find it helps to try to come up with
generic or different descriptions of my problem and go search those as
well...
http://s
Tamas,
I'm brainstorming here - not being careful, just throwing out ideas...
One thing that comes up is a separate document in SOLR - one doc for each
list.
If a user adds a doc to their list, that doc's id gets added to this other
type of document...
So, a document with the title "List 1" wou
OK - I get it. List order is totally arbitrary and cannot be tied to an
hard data point.
I'll have to think - Perhaps billnbell's solution will help, although I'm
not totally sure I understand that suggestion yet.
At this point, you could get all the documents for List X that match the
search te
Sorry I don't know what you mean.
If "listpos" field contains multiple values like "list=pos" then is it
possible to order by field value where that field value fits a query?
For example list 1 contains: p1 and p2, list 2 contains p2 and p1 in this
order, then
p1 document has a listpos field wit
Put the match into 2 separate fields and index it. Then sort in Solr by the 2
fields is one way
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Apr 1, 2016, at 11:15 AM, John Bickerstaff
> wrote:
>
> Just to be clear - I don't mean who requests the list (application or user)
> I mean what "rule" determines
So, the list order is determined by the user. The user creates a list, adds
products to it and i have to display these list using filters and
pagination.
Let's assume there is list with 1 products in it. In the website where
i display the list only 50 products are displayed in a page. So if i
Oh - and if you send a copy of your query - please include a human-readable
version of what your intent is...
Something like: Find all the documents that have "blue" in the color field
in addition to searching the title field for the user's search term..."
...Or whatever your intent is for this s
Just to be clear - I don't mean who requests the list (application or user)
I mean what "rule" determines the ordering of the list?
Or, is there even a rule of any kind?
In other words, does a user arbitrarily decide that documentA, documentF,
and documentW should be on a list of their own? For
Some of the lists are created by users and some are generated by
applications, it doesn't matter.
It would be fine to solve it in Solr because Solr does the work of
filtering and pagination. If sorting were done outside than I would have to
read every document from Solr to sort them. It is not an
Specifically, what drives the position in the list? Is it arbitrary or is
it driven by some piece of data?
If data-driven - code could do the sorting based on that data... separate
from SOLR...
Alternatively, if the data point exists in SOLR, a "sub-query" might be
used to get the right sort or
For example I have to display sellable products which are in list X in the
correct order.
If I add a "status" and "list" (multivalued) fields to every document
(products), then I can execute a query: status:sellable AND list:X, where X
is the ID of the list. The list field contains IDs of the list
I think this is a classic XY Problem , you are trying to solve X with Y ,
and you are asking us about Y .
Could you describe us what is your X problem ? What are you trying to do
with this ordered lists ?
If not I would add a field to the product called :
list_position ( or a similar name) of type
I don't think I understand your problem properly. Are you trying to
pre-sort the products?
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016, 19:49 Tamás Barta, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem and I don't know how should I solve it in Solr.
>
> I have products indexed. Every product can be in lists. It is possible that
> a
Great, thank you very much for your help.
On 16.09.2015 13:07, Mikhail Khludnev wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Florin Mandoc wrote:
Is possible to to also add "name_s:expensive" search term in q? I know i
can add it to fq but I will have no score boost.
Sure you can. But beware o
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:15 PM, Florin Mandoc wrote:
> Is possible to to also add "name_s:expensive" search term in q? I know i
> can add it to fq but I will have no score boost.
Sure you can. But beware of query syntax trap. It's explained by David
Smiley at comment
http://blog.griddynamics.
Hi,
Sorry for letting this thread hanging, I was out of office last week.
I have managed to make it work using this query:
http://localhost:8983/solr/testscoring/select?q={!parent%20which=type_s:product%20score=max}+color_s:Red^=0%20AND%20{!func}price_i&wt=json&indent=true&fl=score,*,[docid]&deb
Hi,
stop the solr server,delete index before indexing you should change or
write schema fields then start solr and index which you want.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Sorting-on-date-with-multivalued-False-attribute-tp4227495p4227625.html
Sent from the So
completely wipe the index, or recreate the collection and re-index.
I'm guessing you changed the definition after some indexing was
done and Lucene is a little confused about what the right
definition is supposed to be.
Best,
Erick
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 7:55 PM, Akash Sahu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am
On 1 September 2015 at 09:10, Mikhail Khludnev
wrote:
>> Not many
>> people know about it, may help to disambiguate the syntax.
>>
> Oh. C'mon! it's announced for ages http://yonik.com/solr/query-syntax/
Not everybody reads and keeps track of every feature of Solr.
Especially for newbies, it help
1 - 100 of 465 matches
Mail list logo
