Thanks Alex, I will check this out.
 Is it possible to do something at query time , using a function query to 
lowercase the field and then sort on it.?
Jay

> On Jun 24, 2016, at 12:03 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Keep voting for SOLR-8362?
> 
> You could do your preprocessing in UpdateRequestProcessor chain. There
> is nothing specifically for Lower/Upper case, but there is a generic
> scripting one: 
> http://www.solr-start.com/javadoc/solr-lucene/org/apache/solr/update/processor/StatelessScriptUpdateProcessorFactory.html
> 
> Regards,
>   Alex.
> ----
> Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
> 
> 
>> On 24 June 2016 at 13:42, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any ideas on how to handle case insensitive search, string fields and
>> docvalues in 1 field?
>> 
>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> At least you don't need to store the sort field. Or even index, if it is
>>> docvalues (good for sort).
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>>    Alex
>>>> On 24 Jun 2016 9:01 AM, "Jay Potharaju" <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> yes, that is what i thought. but was checking to see if there was
>>> something
>>>> I was missing.
>>>> Thanks
>>>> 
>>>> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com.invalid
>>>> 
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Jay,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I don't think it can be combined.
>>>>> Mainly because: searching requires a tokenized field.
>>>>> Sorting requires a single value (token) to be meaningful.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ahmet
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:43 PM, Jay Potharaju <
>>> jspothar...@gmail.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I would like to have 1 field that can used for both searching and case
>>>>> insensitive sorting. As far as i know the only way to do is to have two
>>>>> fields one for searching (text_en) and one for sorting(lowercase &
>>>> string).
>>>>> Any ideas how the two can be combined into 1 field.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>> Jay Potharaju
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Jay Potharaju
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Thanks
>> Jay Potharaju

Reply via email to