Your correct, its not specifically for the update.chain. my mistake.
thanks
msj
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 3:34 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch wrote:
> Which section in the docs specifically? I thought it was multiple chains
> per config file, but you had to choose your specific chain for individual
Which section in the docs specifically? I thought it was multiple chains
per config file, but you had to choose your specific chain for individual
processors.
I might be wrong though.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandre
Alexandre,
it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed in
the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make
sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order without
the need to merge them into a single update processor definitio
Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside the
chain, so why do you care about multiple chains?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps event
