Which section in the docs specifically? I thought it was multiple chains per config file, but you had to choose your specific chain for individual processors.
I might be wrong though. Regards, Alex. Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:51 PM, mike st. john <mstj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Alexandre, > > it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed in > the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make > sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order without > the need to merge them into a single update processor definition. > > thanks > msj > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch > <arafa...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside > the > > chain, so why do you care about multiple chains? > > > > Regards, > > Alex. > > > > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch > > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at > > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <mstj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > is it possible to have multiple run by default? > > > > > > i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the UpdateRequestHandler > > but > > > it didn't seem to work. > > > > > > > > > wondering if its even possible. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > msj > > > > > >
