Alexandre, it was setup with multiple processors and working fine. I just noticed in the docs, it mentioned you could have multiple chains, it seemed to make sense to have the ability to chain the defined processors in order without the need to merge them into a single update processor definition.
thanks msj On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 12:28 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com>wrote: > Only one chain per handler. But then you can define any sequence inside the > chain, so why do you care about multiple chains? > > Regards, > Alex. > > Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch > - Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at > once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book) > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 5:43 AM, mike st. john <mstj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > is it possible to have multiple run by default? > > > > i've tried adding multiple update.chains for the UpdateRequestHandler > but > > it didn't seem to work. > > > > > > wondering if its even possible. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > msj > > >
