Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-29 Thread Eric Grobler
;> and the Solr example application (assumes current trunk codebase and >>>> latest >>>> patches posted to the respective issues). ** >>>> >>>> **Is a bit of an over-statement!** >>>> * >>>> Regards >>>> Eric* >>>> *

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-29 Thread Erik Hatcher
_ From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4 I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know whether it supports this feature of tree faceting.

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-24 Thread Geert-Jan Brits
I believe we use an in-process weakhashmap to store the id-name relationship. It's not that we're talking billions of values here. For anything more mem-intensive we use no-sql (tokyo tyrant through memcached protocol at the moment) 2010/7/24 Jonathan Rochkind > > Perhaps completely unnessecery

RE: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-24 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
> I am keeping the id-to-name lookups in SOLR though, I just use some > "lookup fields" where I put id and name into one field, separated by > some fixed delimiter, e.g. > "134982__Some name I am going to lookup later" > The separator here would be two underscores ("__"). > So I can query for that

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-24 Thread Stefan Moises
Hi Jonathan, I too am using IDs instead of names, one reason being that URLs are easier to read and they are more safe, because special chars in names could break the URLs etc. I am keeping the id-to-name lookups in SOLR though, I just use some "lookup fields" where I put id and name into one

RE: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-24 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
> Perhaps completely unnessecery when you have a controlled domain, but I > meant to use ids for places instead of names, because names will quickly > become ambiguous, e.g.: there are numerous different places over the world > called washington, etc. This is related to something I've been thinkin

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-24 Thread Geert-Jan Brits
Perhaps completely unnessecery when you have a controlled domain, but I meant to use ids for places instead of names, because names will quickly become ambiguous, e.g.: there are numerous different places over the world called washington, etc. 2010/7/24 SR > Hi Geert-Jan, > > What did you mean b

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-24 Thread SR
Hi Geert-Jan, What did you mean by this: > Also, just a suggestion, consider using id's instead of names for filtering; Thanks, -S

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-23 Thread Eric Grobler
than Rochkind >> wrote: >> >> Solr does not, yet, at least not simply, as far as I know, but there are >>> ideas and some JIRA's with maybe some patches: >>> >>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting >>> >>> >>>

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-23 Thread Geert-Jan Brits
>If I am doing >facet=on & facet.field={!ex=State}State & fq={!tag=State}State:Karnataka >All it gives me is Facets on state excluding only that filter query.. But i >was not able to do same on third level ..Like facet.field= Give me the >counts of cities also in state Karantaka.. >Let me know s

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-23 Thread Eric Grobler
solr/HierarchicalFaceting >>> >>> >>> >>> From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM >>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: Tree Faceting

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-23 Thread Erik Hatcher
a...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4 I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know whether it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to index in tree faceting formatl

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-23 Thread Eric Grobler
ome patches: > > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting > > > > From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr

RE: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-22 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4 I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know whether it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to index in tree faceting formatlike 1/2/3/4 1/2/3 1/2 1 In-case of multilevel fac

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-22 Thread rajini maski
I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know whether it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to index in tree faceting formatlike 1/2/3/4 1/2/3 1/2 1 In-case of multilevel faceting it will give only 2 level tree facet is what i found.. If i give

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-22 Thread Eric Grobler
Thank you for the link. I was not aware of the multifaceting syntax - this will enable me to run 1 less query on the main page! However this is not a tree faceting feature. Thanks Eric On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:51 PM, SR wrote: > Perhaps the following article can help: > http://www.craftyf

Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4

2010-07-22 Thread SR
Perhaps the following article can help: http://www.craftyfella.com/2010/01/faceting-and-multifaceting-syntax-in.html -S On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Eric Grobler wrote: > Hi Solr Community > > If I have: > COUNTRY CITY > Germany Berlin > Germany Hamburg > Spain Madrid > > Can I do faceting