Hi Erik, Thanks, -p1 vs -p0 must then be the issue.
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com>wrote: > I use patch -p0, not -p1. But otherwise that looks the same as what I do. > > Can you try again with -p0 and see if it's still an issue? (or have you > gotten past this and I've just not caught up with mails yet?) > > Erik > > > On Jul 23, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Eric Grobler wrote: > > Hi Erik, >> >> I must be doing something wrong :-( >> I took: >> svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk mytest >> then i copied SOLR-792.path to folder /mytest/solr >> then i ran: >> patch -p1 < SOLR-792.patch >> >> but I get "can't find file to patch at input line 5" >> Is this the correct trunk and patch command? >> >> However if I just manually >> - copy TreeFacetComponent.java to folder >> solr/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component >> - add SimpleOrderedMap<SimpleOrderedMap> _treeFacets; to >> ResponseBuilder.java >> - and make the changes to solrconfig.xml >> I am able to compile and run your test :-) >> >> Regards >> Eric >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Erik Hatcher <erik.hatc...@gmail.com >> >wrote: >> >> I've update the SOLR-792 patch to apply to trunk (using the solr/ >>> directory >>> as the root still, not the higher-level trunk/). >>> >>> This one I think is an important one that I'd love to see eventually part >>> of Solr built-in, but the TODO's in TreeFacetComponent ought to be taken >>> care of first, to generalize this to N fields levels and maybe some other >>> must/nice-to-haves. >>> >>> Erik >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jul 23, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Eric Grobler wrote: >>> >>> Thanks I saw the article, >>> >>>> >>>> As far as I can tell the trunk archives only go back to the middle of >>>> March >>>> and the 2 patches are from the beginning of the year. >>>> >>>> Thus: >>>> *These approaches can be tried out easily using a single set of sample >>>> data >>>> and the Solr example application (assumes current trunk codebase and >>>> latest >>>> patches posted to the respective issues). ** >>>> >>>> **Is a bit of an over-statement!** >>>> * >>>> Regards >>>> Eric* >>>> * >>>> On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Jonathan Rochkind <rochk...@jhu.edu> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Solr does not, yet, at least not simply, as far as I know, but there are >>>> >>>>> ideas and some JIRA's with maybe some patches: >>>>> >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ________________________________________ >>>>> From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com] >>>>> Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM >>>>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4 >>>>> >>>>> I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to know >>>>> whether >>>>> it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to index >>>>> in >>>>> tree faceting format....like >>>>> >>>>> 1/2/3/4 >>>>> 1/2/3 >>>>> 1/2 >>>>> 1 >>>>> >>>>> In-case of multilevel faceting it will give only 2 level tree facet is >>>>> what >>>>> i found.. >>>>> >>>>> If i give query as : country India and state Karnataka and city >>>>> bangalore...All what i want is a facet count 1) for condition above. >>>>> 2) >>>>> The >>>>> number of states in that Country 3) the number of cities in that state >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> Like => Country: India ,State:Karnataka , City: Bangalore <1> >>>>> >>>>> State:Karnataka >>>>> Kerla >>>>> Tamilnadu >>>>> Andra Pradesh...and so on.... >>>>> >>>>> City: Mysore >>>>> Hubli >>>>> Mangalore >>>>> Coorg and so on... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If I am doing >>>>> facet=on & facet.field={!ex=State}State & >>>>> fq={!tag=State}State:Karnataka >>>>> >>>>> All it gives me is Facets on state excluding only that filter query.. >>>>> But >>>>> i >>>>> was not able to do same on third level ..Like facet.field= Give me the >>>>> counts of cities also in state Karantaka.. >>>>> Let me know solution for this... >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Rajani Maski >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Eric Grobler < >>>>> impalah...@googlemail.com >>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Thank you for the link. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I was not aware of the multifaceting syntax - this will enable me to >>>>>> run >>>>>> >>>>>> 1 >>>>> >>>>> less query on the main page! >>>>>> >>>>>> However this is not a tree faceting feature. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Eric >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:51 PM, SR <r.steve....@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps the following article can help: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> http://www.craftyfella.com/2010/01/faceting-and-multifaceting-syntax-in.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> -S >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Eric Grobler wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Solr Community >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If I have: >>>>>>>> COUNTRY CITY >>>>>>>> Germany Berlin >>>>>>>> Germany Hamburg >>>>>>>> Spain Madrid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can I do faceting like: >>>>>>>> Germany >>>>>>>> Berlin >>>>>>>> Hamburg >>>>>>>> Spain >>>>>>>> Madrid >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I tried to apply SOLR-792 to the current trunk but it does not seem >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> be >>>>>> >>>>>> compatible. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maybe there is a similar feature existing in the latest builds? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks & Regards >>>>>>>> Eric >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >
