I use patch -p0, not -p1. But otherwise that looks the same as what I
do.
Can you try again with -p0 and see if it's still an issue? (or have
you gotten past this and I've just not caught up with mails yet?)
Erik
On Jul 23, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Eric Grobler wrote:
Hi Erik,
I must be doing something wrong :-(
I took:
svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/trunk mytest
then i copied SOLR-792.path to folder /mytest/solr
then i ran:
patch -p1 < SOLR-792.patch
but I get "can't find file to patch at input line 5"
Is this the correct trunk and patch command?
However if I just manually
- copy TreeFacetComponent.java to folder
solr/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component
- add SimpleOrderedMap<SimpleOrderedMap> _treeFacets; to
ResponseBuilder.java
- and make the changes to solrconfig.xml
I am able to compile and run your test :-)
Regards
Eric
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Erik Hatcher
<erik.hatc...@gmail.com>wrote:
I've update the SOLR-792 patch to apply to trunk (using the solr/
directory
as the root still, not the higher-level trunk/).
This one I think is an important one that I'd love to see
eventually part
of Solr built-in, but the TODO's in TreeFacetComponent ought to be
taken
care of first, to generalize this to N fields levels and maybe some
other
must/nice-to-haves.
Erik
On Jul 23, 2010, at 3:45 AM, Eric Grobler wrote:
Thanks I saw the article,
As far as I can tell the trunk archives only go back to the middle
of
March
and the 2 patches are from the beginning of the year.
Thus:
*These approaches can be tried out easily using a single set of
sample
data
and the Solr example application (assumes current trunk codebase and
latest
patches posted to the respective issues). **
**Is a bit of an over-statement!**
*
Regards
Eric*
*
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:22 AM, Jonathan Rochkind
<rochk...@jhu.edu>
wrote:
Solr does not, yet, at least not simply, as far as I know, but
there are
ideas and some JIRA's with maybe some patches:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HierarchicalFaceting
________________________________________
From: rajini maski [rajinima...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 12:34 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tree Faceting in Solr 1.4
I am also looking out for same feature in Solr and very keen to
know
whether
it supports this feature of tree faceting... Or we are forced to
index in
tree faceting format....like
1/2/3/4
1/2/3
1/2
1
In-case of multilevel faceting it will give only 2 level tree
facet is
what
i found..
If i give query as : country India and state Karnataka and city
bangalore...All what i want is a facet count 1) for condition
above. 2)
The
number of states in that Country 3) the number of cities in that
state
...
Like => Country: India ,State:Karnataka , City: Bangalore <1>
State:Karnataka
Kerla
Tamilnadu
Andra Pradesh...and so on....
City: Mysore
Hubli
Mangalore
Coorg and so on...
If I am doing
facet=on & facet.field={!ex=State}State & fq={!
tag=State}State:Karnataka
All it gives me is Facets on state excluding only that filter
query.. But
i
was not able to do same on third level ..Like facet.field= Give
me the
counts of cities also in state Karantaka..
Let me know solution for this...
Regards,
Rajani Maski
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Eric Grobler <
impalah...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Thank you for the link.
I was not aware of the multifaceting syntax - this will enable
me to run
1
less query on the main page!
However this is not a tree faceting feature.
Thanks
Eric
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:51 PM, SR <r.steve....@gmail.com> wrote:
Perhaps the following article can help:
http://www.craftyfella.com/2010/01/faceting-and-multifaceting-syntax-in.html
-S
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Eric Grobler wrote:
Hi Solr Community
If I have:
COUNTRY CITY
Germany Berlin
Germany Hamburg
Spain Madrid
Can I do faceting like:
Germany
Berlin
Hamburg
Spain
Madrid
I tried to apply SOLR-792 to the current trunk but it does not
seem
to
be
compatible.
Maybe there is a similar feature existing in the latest builds?
Thanks & Regards
Eric
