ok, thank you Erick, i will check this forum as well.
thanks
SN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Geodist-tp3287005p3300236.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
This is the one I've used,
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialSearch
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:09 PM, solrnovice wrote:
> hi Erik, today i had the distance working. Since the solr version under
> LucidImagination is not returning geodist(), I downloaded Solr 4.0 from the
> nightly bu
No, this form is part of the Apache Solr project. Lucid does maintain
a searchable index of this list though...
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:40 PM, solrnovice wrote:
> hi Lance, thanks for the link, i went to their site, lucidimagination forum,
> when i searched on geodist, i see my own
hi Lance, thanks for the link, i went to their site, lucidimagination forum,
when i searched on geodist, i see my own posts. Is this forum part of
lucidimagination?
Just curious.
thanks
SN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Geodist-tp3287005p3297262.html
Se
Lucid also has an online forum for questions about the LucidWorksEnterprise
product:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/forum/lwe
The Lucidi Imagination engineers all read the forum and endeavor to quickly
answer questions like this.
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 6:09 PM, solrnovice wrote:
> hi Erik, t
hi Erik, today i had the distance working. Since the solr version under
LucidImagination is not returning geodist(), I downloaded Solr 4.0 from the
nightly build. On lucid we had the full schema defined. So i copied that
schema to the "example" directory of solr-4 and removed all references to
Luc
That should be fine. I'm not actually sure what version of Trunk I
have, I update it sporadically and build from scratch. But the "last
successful build" artifacts will certainly have the pseudo-field
return of function in it, so you should be fine.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 2:33 PM, sol
I think i found the link to the nightly build, i am going to try this flavor
of solr and run the query and check what happens.
The link i am using is
https://builds.apache.org/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/artifacts/
thanks
SN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.
Eric, can you please let me know the solr build, that you are using. I went
to this below site, but i want to use the same build, you are using, so i
can make sure the queries work.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FrontPage#solr_development
thanks
SN
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene
Eric, thank you for the quick update, so in the below query you sent to me, i
can also add any conditions right? i mean city:Boston and state:MA...etc ,
can i also use "dismax" query syntax?
The confusion from the beginning seems to be the version of solr i was
trying and the one you are trying.
&q=*:*&sfield=store&pt=45.15,-93.85&fl=name,store,geodist()
Actually, you don't even have to specify the d=, I misunderstood.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:56 AM, solrnovice wrote:
> hi Eric, thank you for the tip, i will try that option. Where can i find a
> document that shows details
hi Eric, thank you for the tip, i will try that option. Where can i find a
document that shows details of geodist arguments, when i google, i did not
find one.
so this is what my query is like. I want the distance to be returned. i dont
now exactly what all to pass to geodist, as i couldnt find a
Why couldn't you just give an outrageous distance (10) or something?
You have to have some kind of point you're asking for the distance
*from*, don't you?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, solrnovice wrote:
> Eric, thanks for the update, I thought solr 4.0 should have the pseudo
Eric, thanks for the update, I thought solr 4.0 should have the pseudo
columns and i am using the right version. So did you ever worked on a query
to return distance, where there is no long, lat are used in the where
clause. I mean not in a radial search, but a city search, but displayed the
dista
Based on the date, this was a LucidWorks Enterprise distribution that predated
the addition of pseudo-fields to Solr for returning function values like that.
We have another release of LWE coming out, oh I dunno exactly, in a month or
so? It'll have the latest greatest Solr "4.0" (which is con
hi Eric, thank you for the response. We use this product , which comes with
solr, http://www.lucidimagination.com/.
They have a UI on top of solr, its easy to add fields or edit their
properties using their UI.
The queries I write are using the solr which comes with lucid imagination ,
it says it
When you say you are using "LucidImagination", what is that?
The Dev version of LucidWorks? A certified distro (which I don't
think there are any for trunk)?
I'm using a recent (last week) trunk version that I built manually, but
I think this has been for a while
Anyway, pasting in your field
Eric, thanks for the quick response. I left out the "d" value, yes, when you
perform a spatial query, we should have a distance of d>0, sorry about that.
What is the setting of your "store" value, i mean in the schema, was it
marked at LatLong. For some reason i dont see the geodist() being retur
When I try this form the stock solr example (using "store" rather than
"coordinate" for the field, your first example gives me an error of
"d must be > 0" or some such. When I add a "d" value to the query,
both your first and second queries work just fine and the second
returns a "geodist" value in
19 matches
Mail list logo
