When you say you are using "LucidImagination", what is that?
The Dev version of LucidWorks? A certified distro (which I don't
think there are any for trunk)?

I'm using a recent (last week) trunk version that I built manually, but
I think this has been for a while....

Anyway, pasting in your field definition and query (from your
first post) returns the distance as a field just fine, so I suspect
something else you've changed somehow is interfering. Have
you re-indexed from scratch? I often delete the entire
data/index directory (directory to!). Or you have an
earlier version that I think you do, have you looked at the JIRA
to see when it was applied to trunk?

One approach would be to just start with a stock Solr and try
the example, and then build up gradually to where you are now
to see what change you might have introduced is the problem,
but that's a guess...

Best
Erick

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:37 PM, solrnovice <manisha...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Eric, thanks for the quick response. I left out the "d" value, yes, when you
> perform a spatial query, we should have a distance of d>0, sorry about that.
>
> What is the setting of your "store" value, i mean in the schema, was it
> marked at LatLong. For some reason i dont see the geodist() being returned
> in the result set. my coordinates is setup as  "type=location", below is the
> snapshot from my schema.xml.
>
> <field indexed="true" multiValued="false" name="coordinates"
> omitNorms="false" omitTermFreqAndPositions="true" stored="true"
> termVectors="false" type="location"/>
>
>
> We are using LucidImagination, so i guess it comes with Solr 4.0, please let
> me know if i am wrong. That may be the reason for geodist() not being
> returned.I checked the solr version by going to solr admin and checked the
> version. it shows 4.0.
>
> For now i found a work around, this works for me. the distance is returned
> in the form of "score".
>
> http://127.0.0.1:8888/solr/apex_dev/select/?q=*:*+_val_:%22geodist%28%29%22&rows=100&fq={!geofilt}&sfield=coordinates&pt=31.2225,-85.3931&d=50&sort=geodist%28%29%20asc&fl=*,score
>
> I read in a different post that , earlier versions of solr ( prior to 4.0),
> we have to use the score option.
>
> thanks for taking time to try the query.
>
>
> SN
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-Geodist-tp3287005p3287806.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Reply via email to