On Feb 1, 2007, at 6:47 AM, Zaheed Haque wrote:
I think trying to tackle two problem (Learning Solr as well as
solrb/flare) at the
same time is giving the problem. While I was writing the i18n unit
test I found
out the 100% test cov. thats really cool. Now in terms of docs.. I
think it would
On 2/1/07, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
> Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
> So, no, the current information provided by this handler does not
> contain frequency information. I'd be happy to consider patches that
> allow it
On Jan 30, 2007, at 5:33 AM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
So, no, the current information provided by this handler does not
contain frequency information. I'd be happy to consider patches that
allow it to provide more information, though I'd like to keep the
ba
Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev:
So, no, the current information provided by this handler does not
contain frequency information. I'd be happy to consider patches that
allow it to provide more information, though I'd like to keep the
basic index information request as succinct as p
On Jan 29, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Antonio Eggberg wrote:
After doing quite a bit of searching what I understand is that the
medicine to my problem of word count is in docTermFreq and
TermEnum ... as Chris Hostetter points out clearly for statistical
purpose in the post below. (Please note I am n
I'm a little back logged on mail or i would have replied to your word
count email earlier...
one thing to keep in mind is that the index doesn't deal in "words" it
deals in "terms" -- the differnece being a term has "field" and a "token"
-- what was discussed in the mail archives leading up to th
